Saturday, February 5, 2011

The burning stupidity of Christian assholes.

It's impossible to be more retarded than this uneducated moron. Notice that the drooling flat-earther invokes the assholes of a magical creationism organization who teach children the entire universe was magically created 6,000 years ago.

"I used to believe that evolution was the best explanation, but then I discovered that there is an awful lot of evidence which contradicts evolution, which is 'hidden' by evolutionists and most of the media. But if you check Aig you will see that evolution is quite easy to refute scientifically."

That's right asshole. The entire scientific community is part of a vast conspiracy to hide the truth about the evidence against evolution.

You fucking idiot Christians. Any scientist who had just a tiny shred of evidence against evolution would instantly become famous if he published that information. It's never happened because after 150 years of testing evolution, evolution has passed every test.

Christians, I'm sorry but you are the most idiotic subhumans who ever lived. Please shut the fuck up or get off my planet.

Creationists sometimes claim that scientists have a vested interest in the concept of biological evolution and are unwilling to consider other possibilities. But this claim, too, misrepresents science. Scientists continually test their ideas against observations and submit their work to their colleagues for critical peer review of ideas, evidence, and conclusions before a scientific paper is published in any respected scientific journal. Unexplained observations are eagerly pursued because they can be signs of important new science or problems with an existing hypothesis or theory. History is replete with scientists challenging accepted theory by offering new evidence and more comprehensive explanations to account for natural phenomena. Also, science has a competitive element as well as a cooperative one. If one scientist clings to particular ideas despite evidence to the contrary, another scientist will attempt to replicate relevant experiments and will not hesitate to publish conflicting evidence. If there were serious problems in evolutionary science, many scientists would be eager to win fame by being the first to provide a better testable alternative. That there are no viable alternatives to evolution in the scientific literature is not because of vested interests or censorship but because evolution has been and continues to be solidly supported by evidence.
-- National Academy of Sciences

No comments:

Post a Comment