If you look at the universe and study the universe, what you find is that there is no evidence that we need anything other than the laws of physics and the other laws of science to explain everything we see. There's absolutely no evidence that we need any supernatural hand of god. -- Lawrence Krauss, World-Renowned Physicist
There is probably no other notion in any field of science that has been as extensively tested and as thoroughly corroborated as the evolutionary origin of living organisms. -- Encyclopedia Britannica
FAITH. No one word personifies the absolute worst and most wicked properties of religion better than that. Faith is mind-rot. It’s the poison that destroys critical thinking, undermines evidence, and leads people into lives dedicated to absurdity. It’s a parasite regarded as a virtue. -- PZ Myers
Religion is the antithesis of science, an anesthetic for the mind that disables critical thought and encourages the acceptance of inanity as fact, and wishful thinking as evidence. -- PZ Myers

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

This is a cut and paste job. It's about a Christian asshole who attacks science with his breathtaking stupidity. He works for the Christian Creationist Discovery Institute, aka Crackpot Central. Their goal is to dumb down science education in Idiot America to accommodate the bullshit in their ridiculous bible. This is a quote I saved a long time ago. The author is Mike Toreno (his internet name) and I don't know anything about him except that what he wrote was brilliant.

ID creationism is misrepresented by its adherents, not its critics.

The various statements of what ID creationism is are simply obfuscations of the following argument:

I don't understand the reason for X phenomenon. Therefore X phenomenon originated by magic.

For example, take the contention that the bacterial flagellum could not have originated through a step by step process. That's an obfuscation of the true argument, which is "I don't understand how the bacterial flagellum could have originated through a step by step process."

The response, of course, is: Well, maybe you not understanding something doesn't mean it can't be understood. There are other reasons why you might not understand something. Maybe you're just stupid.

Dembski gave some talk in Oklahoma, and he got totally pwned. He talked about the bacterial flagellum, and some guy in the audience, during the question and answer session, said, I can explain how the bacterial flagellum could have originated through a step by step process, and did it. Of course, then Dembski wanted more steps. No matter how many steps you present, the ID creationist wants more. This is a slight variation of the ID creationist argument, and reads as follows:

I won't admit that X phenomenon could have originated through natural means. Therefore, X phenomenon must have originated by magic.

And the answer, of course, is: Well, maybe you're just a liar.

The idea that proponents of ID creationism have been discriminated against is based on a misconception - namely, that every idea is of equal merit. ID creationists aren't able to gain acceptance for their ideas not because of philosophical resistance, discrimination, or conspiracy, but because their ideas are stupid. I mean, when a real scientist explains phenomena that an ID creationist says is unexplainable, is the ID creationist still entitled to a respectful hearing for his claim?

ID creationism adherents believe in ID creationism because they haven't considered, or don't want to consider, the possibility that they're just retarded. Well, it's time for them to consider it.

-- Mike Toreno

I love chess endgames especially when I still have two bishops.

"Bishop vs Knight - Which one do you prefer?"

It depends on the position. If a knight finds a home deep in enemy territory that is a powerful knight.

In the endgame when the material is equal and when there are pawns on both sides of the board then 2 bishops should defeat a bishop & knight. I have won many games like this.

The bishops have the advantage in this endgame because they can get to the other side of the board in one move. However the knights are always dangerous. I use pawns to restrict the mobility of the knights.

When my opponent trades a bishop for my knight that's usually a good thing for me.

https://lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/bishop-vs-knight---which-one-do-you-prefer?page=3#24

It's impossible to be more fucking stupid than a Christian retard. I write stuff. I wrote this. Here it is.

"they say the witnesses of Jesus are reliable sources"
Dead witnesses who may or may not have been invented are not evidence for anything. The ridiculous bible is not evidence for anything.
Fantastic claims (for example the magical resurrection of the magic jeebus man, imagine the smell) require fantastic evidence. The Christians have nothing but their wishful thinking and their breathtaking stupidity.

What I wrote at Reddit - Debate A Christian. I wrote about the breathtaking stupidity of evolution deniers. At this place I must pretend to be nice or get thrown out.

WHAT SOMEBODY ELSE WROTE:

"For example, there is a strong following of biblical literalists in America, these folk have strong financial support and provide direct funding for institutes such as institute of creation research and creation research. However, many denominations of Christianity would disagree with this view and likely consider such "interpretation" of the bible as false or incorrect, but this presents a hermeneutical problem: Creationists are using a specific interpretation of the bible to reach a conclusion they think is true/correct (a literal interpretation) and other denominations refer to the same texts but choose not to interpret that way. Who has it more correct or true?"

WHAT I WROTE:

"Creation research" as if it's possible to research supernatural magic.

In America where I live there are countless millions of creationists. They want to throw out the foundation of biology, aka the strongest fact of science, aka evolution by natural selection. They disgrace my country.

They want to replace two centuries of scientific progress with the Genesis myth in the Bible. I don't understand why these people don't educate themselves. There's tons of stuff out there to study. How hard is it to look things up with Google search?

They refuse to study any evidence as explained by competent biologists. They get all their information about science (which is completely wrong and extremely dishonest) from professional liars who don't know what they're talking about.

Embryology, DNA sequencing, and several other branches of science all confirm the same thing. We share ancestors with all other life and we are most closely related to chimpanzee apes. They evolved from the same ancient apes we evolved from.

The four billion year history of life as explained by evolution is very interesting and it has the advantage of being true thanks to thousands of evidences more powerful than Charles Darwin could have imagined possible. The know-nothing creationists don't know what they're missing.

Fortunately there are Christians who accept the established truth of evolution. They unfortunately pollute evolution with supernatural magic but at least they don't deny the whole thing.

The creationists get one thing right. They say evolution threaten their beliefs. They're right about that. The religious implications of evolution can't be denied. Evolution by natural selection took away God's most important job.

Monday, July 24, 2017

Praying is talking to yourself. It's a mental illness. This is what someone else wrote about praying. This is a copy and paste job.

The true purpose of prayer is to make the people who pray feel better – it is a way of making believers feel they have exerted some degree of control over a situation that is beyond their control. Indeed, this is one of the major purposes of religion. Human beings have always been, and still are, at the mercy of a complex and often frightening world. It is only natural that people in such circumstances would be eager, even desperate, for a way to calm their fears and give themselves confidence, and this is what prayer provides. It gives believers a “direct line” to the highest power in the universe, the one whom they are told is on their side and will make sure everything turns out all right for them. This ability to cope has always been one of the major perceived benefits of religious belief, and atheists who seek to make inroads against theism would do well to remember it.
As long as believers picture atheism as a bleak existence bereft of meaning or hope, they will always reject it regardless of the arguments offered in its favor. If atheism is ever to spread and flourish, we must overcome these misperceptions and show that, on the contrary, it leads to empathy, purpose and positive action. The most insidious effect of prayer is that it encourages believers to remain passive in times of crisis, waiting for divine deliverance that will never come rather than taking effective action. Atheism, by contrast, teaches human beings to get up off their knees and begin living life. Rather than ask for all our wishes to be fulfilled, it is up to us to bring into existence the world that we want to live in. As the great agnostic orator Robert Green Ingersoll wrote, “The hands that help are holier than the lips that pray.”

Sunday, July 23, 2017

Richard Dawkins: One Fact to Refute Creationism. Video is about 2 minutes.

Before I closed this blog there were several dozen visitors a day. I recently made it available to the public again. Virtually nobody knows about it.

This blog was closed to the public for a very long time. I have recently made it available again. Virtually nobody knows about it these days. If you find this place please feel free to write a comment and please help advertise it. Many thanks.

Atheist liberals suck up to Muslim scum. This is what I wrote about them. I suggest click the link.

"While KPFA emphatically supports serious free speech, we do not support abusive speech."
When did telling the truth about Islam become abusive? Also why are atheist liberals in love with Islam? A real atheist would be willing to criticize all religions, especially anti-science cults like Islam.
Liberals love suppressing freedom of speech. That's why they invented the ridiculous word Islamophobia. The idea is if don't like terrorists you have a phobia. I suggest liberals are not too bright.

Saturday, July 22, 2017

Someone had a good idea and I wrote about it.

The question I'd ask is whether the truly righteous would even want to live again. Part of to be righteous is to be humble, to not covet new and shiny things.
Well done. It would be interesting to hear what a Christian has to say about it.
I think wishing for a magical 2nd life is being greedy. I'm grateful for the one life I have.
I like reality. If reality was thrown out so I can live again, I would not like that at all. A world of supernatural magic would be a terrible thing. Fortunately reality is what it is and it doesn't care if other people want to throw reality out. Reality isn't going anywhere. Therefore dead people stay dead and that's a good thing.
Atheism is an acceptance of reality. Theism is the acceptance of fantasy. Take your pick.

Somebody asked this question: "Could you hold your own in an evolution debate?" This was my reply.

"Could you hold your own in an evolution debate?"
I don't understand that. There is nothing to debate. Evolution is the strongest fact of science. Period.
If some brain-dead evolution denier wants to debate the established truth of evolution I just tell that person to grow up, educate himself, and face facts. It's pointless to explain science to a science denier for the same reason it's pointless to teach a dog how to play chess.
At least the dog won't repeatedly ask dumb questions without ever wanting to know the answer. Science deniers have an incurable mental illness. They are a waste of time. Stupid can't be fixed.

A bible thumping retard said he could go snow skiing after he drops dead. The extreme stupid burns. What I wrote for the childish moron. I'm suppose to be nice at this place so I can't tell the retard to grow up and face facts.

ski downhill
After you're dead you could go snow skiing. I think it's fair to say everything you wrote is wishful thinking and does not have one shred of real evidence.
I suggest it's better to focus on the one life you have instead of wishing for 2nd life which is totally impossible. The fantasy would require throwing out all of reality. With all due respect I suggest the magical heaven fantasy is very childish.
We are all lucking to be alive. I think wishing for a 2nd life is being greedy.
My two cents.

Idiot America's evolution deniers, the stupid, it burns.

WHAT THE CHRISTIAN RETARD WROTE:

Get serious and acknowledge that while Darwin was very smart and did his best to explain mankind, he could only offer hypotheses.

With so much written on how we got to where are today without God, let us breathlessly await the explanation of how undisciplined random processes produced the wonder, mystery and complexity of Homo sapiens.
------------------------------------------------------------
WHAT I WROTE:

Natural selection is not random. Please take your complaints to the molecular biologists at MIT. I have no time for science deniers.
------------------------------------------------------------
Wall Street Journal: Less Unique Than We Think The idea that humans are special bumps up against Darwin’s great insight: the continuity of all life. David Barash reviews “The Creative Spark” by Agustín Fuentes and “Darwin’s Unfinished Symphony” by Kevin N. Laland.
------------------------------------------------------------
Another anti-science Christian asshole wrote this bullshit:

Darwin's work "The Origin of Species" doesn't explain the origin of species. There is no explanation of how species arise. Natural selection can only explain variations within a species. Reproduction only happens within a species. Dogs and cats cannot crossbreed with each other.
------------------------------------------------------------
No shirt Sherlock. Dogs and cats are on different branches of the tree of life. Everything else you wrote is bullshit. Typical know-nothing asshole for Jeebus.
------------------------------------------------------------
The Wall Street Journal subscribers are mostly Republican conservatives as am I. However there is nothing conservative about denying basic facts of science. Christian assholes have made the Republican Party a laughing stock and they have my contempt.

Friday, July 21, 2017

What someone else wrote at Reddit Debate A Christian and what I wrote.

Religion seems archaic and unnecessary, enlighten me as to why you follow it?

First off, I am not trying to say you beliefs are unworthy or not important, but religion seems pretty archaic. This applies to every religion, not just Christianity. With humanity advancing every decade, why do you still cling on to ancient human practices? It seems there is a steady increase in how we can explain natural phenomenons using evidence based theories and facts. In my opinion, humanity could be centuries more advanced if religion did not hinder progress. People used to think god caused illness, later is was proved to be caused by bacteria and viruses (germ theory). People used to think god caused earth quakes and tsunamis, this was later proved false with the theory of tectonic plates. People thought god made night and day/cosmic events, this was later explained using cosmology and People still believe god created people, but this is proved (although you may refute it) false with the theory of evolution. Why do you choose to following something with 0 real evidence vs something with actual proof? If 95 percent of engineers said your house is unstable, would you still live there? If 95 percent of doctors said you have cancer, would you believe them? If 95 percent of scientists say evolution is a fact, why would people still chose to still to not believe it?

Of course religion has done many good deeds for humanity, but overall, I think we would be much better off if we abandoned blind faith that was passed down from ancient people for modern logic and reason.

Again, not to put anyone down, I just do not see the value in believing in something that is borderline delusional (if someone came to you and said an all powerful entity was telling them things in their head- like every prophet- most people would think they are mentally ill) Enlighten me to your reasons for believing in something with no proof other than "just because".

--------------------------------------------

WHAT I WROTE:

"enlighten me as to why you follow it?"

I'm betting the magical 2nd life has something to do with it.

I'm satisfied with one life. I don't wish for anything more. For some reason religious people have to have a 2nd life. I don't understand why. And of course it's impossible.

"If 95 percent of scientists say evolution is a fact"

It would be more accurate to say 100% of competent biologists would call evolution a very strong fact supported by thousands of powerful evidence. They all agree we have a close evolutionary relationship with chimpanzee apes. Virtually every real biologist, including the rare competent religious biologists, agree God had nothing to do with it. Evolution by natural selection is a natural process. Supernatural magic is not required.

Christians should realize if the development of new species never required God then there is no reason to pretend God was required for anything else. My point is evolution has killed the idea there is a magical being in this universe.

What you wrote is excellent. Well done.

What somebody from the UK wrote about the disgusting expensive chess.com and the totally free and excellent lichess.org.

People there will pay £80 a year for what? What do you actually get for your money? 

1. Unlimited tactics - get them here or chesstempo for free.
2. Lessons - That don't help you improve
3. Videos - This is a good feature but they only allow it for diamond members. 
4. Access to databases that you get for free on other sites.

My main problem with chess.com is their tier system of membership. Even if you support the site financially they still restrict your use depending on your membership level. A gold member for example is limited to 25 tactics a day. A platinum member gets unlimited but only 10 lessons a day and no access to videos. The biggest scam though is limiting game analysis. Something that costs chess.com nothing as they use Stockfish. 

Any mention of lichess on their site gets deleted immediately. Apparently Eric says mention of the site is ok but comparisons are not allowed. The mods have clearly not got that memo.

I was a diamond member for months. I wish I had found this site sooner. I can't donate too much a month to this site just now but when I can I will definitely be paying more.


A Muslim asshole (they're all assholes) gave me a hard time about something I wrote. Here is my reply.

I know everything I need to know about Islam, the world's largest terrorist organization. Even the "moderate" Muslims treat women like farm animals. They're all evolution deniers. It's one of the most idiotic religious cults ever invented.
You read this mister: "Infidel" by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. She has to have bodyguards with her for the rest of her life because your disgusting religion of peace wants to kill her.


My comment is "waiting to be approved by Middleeasteye" which has a long history of censorship.

Thursday, July 20, 2017

The breathtaking stupidity of the Catholic Death Cult.

"The Vatican has fast-tracked Hamel’s path to sainthood, and Francis has already declared him 'blessed,' the first step in the canonization process."

The next step is inventing a miracle and then pretending the miracle was real.

What somebody wrote at today's Calvin & Hobbes

It is always so very sad to see how LARGE and VOCAL the anti-science attitudes are in the population. Global warming is very, very well supported from a myriad of scientific studies and research reports. The same is true for ideas of evolution. The largest preponderance of studies and reports supports the tenets of evolutionary theory.
The population that is so virulently anti-science has an unfortunate lack of understanding of the science process…. namely that nothing is ever proven 100% in science. It is a concept of thinking that is based upon probabilities. When 95+% of research studies provide statistically relevant data in support of a particular question, it is considered extremely well supported.
This was my reply:
Well done what you wrote. America is infested with science deniers. Evolution and global warming makes them cry.

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

There are Muslim scum but thank goodness there are ex-Muslims, millions of them.

ExMuslim TV

"Am I an Islamophobe? Or isn't Islam freedomophobe?"

Rasheed, Moroccan #ExMuslim

"This is my first time saying it in public: I am an ExMuslim. Not covering up my face could get me killed."

Atheist wimps have my contempt.

"I've had atheists make this case to me that they are not making a claim"

Those atheists are wimps. The wimps are part of the religious stupidity problem and they have my contempt. This website, by the way, is infested with atheist wimps. It's disgusting. They need to grow up.

I make this claim: Magic is not real therefore magic god fairies are impossible. Period.

Atheism is an acceptance of reality. Theism is a denial of reality.

Take your pick.

One more thing.

This is an example of the wimps who write comments here: "I'm an atheist because I haven't yet found any good reason/argument/evidence to believe that any gods exist."

FFS how difficult is it to say "I'm 100% certain there are no gods because it's the most ridiculous and most childish fantasy ever invented."

Come on people. Grow up FFS.

Here's another wimp: "We're claiming there's no credible evidence for the existence of any gods."

Wimps should speak for themselves.

There is no evidence for the Magic Man. I get that. But it's wimpy to say that when this is more accurate: There are no god fairies for the same reason there are no Easter Bunnies. It's a bullshit fantasy for feeble-minded cowards.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAnAtheist/comments/6o5ng4/the_claims_of_atheism/?sort=new

Monday, July 17, 2017

An ex-Muslim talks about his religion-tormented childhood; his terror of hell; his attempted suicide; his path of agony, to reach at last the relief of atheism.

“The only way to reform Islam is to get rid of Islam.”

http://theatheistconservative.com/2017/07/17/a-path-of-agony/ TWO EXCELLENT VIDEOS.

http://www.thethinkingatheist.com

WHAT I WROTE AT ATHEIST CONSERVATIVE:

“The only way to reform Islam is to get rid of Islam.”
This has been obvious to me a long time. At another website I wrote "If moderate Muslims had any sense of decency they would throw their disgusting cult out."
Numerous liberal atheists cried like babies. The harassment was intense, never ending, and very stupid. I call these people atheist wimps. I don't know what's wrong with them but their disease is incurable.

How did the universe come from nothing? Hint: The Magic Man had nothing to do with it.

http://discovermagazine.com/2013/september/13-starting-point

At Reddit I asked Christians a question about evolution. I expect my answer will be ignored. We will see what happens.

Some Christians deny the established truth of evolution. Other Christians accept our evolutionary relationship with the other ape species but they always invoke God to invent or use or guide evolution even though natural processes do not require a god for anything.

My question is are there any Christians who accept the overwhelming evidence for evolution without sticking God into it?

Virtually all biologists agree God had nothing to do with the evolution of new species. They agree evolution did not require an inventor and evolution does not require a user, and of course God is not a mechanism of evolution. Natural selection guides evolution, not some god.

Are there any Christians who agree with the biologists?

Many thanks.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAChristian/comments/6ntn3s/weekly_ask_a_christian_july_17_2017/?sort=old

A Christian replied:

To say virtually all biologists say God had nothing to do with it is a bit outlandish and I would need a source. I know several biologists personally who do believe that, and I've even read several papers by atheist biologists on the subject of evolution, where they conclude that evolution to have begun is seemingly impossible, but it must have happened because we're here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fucktard knows some extremely stupid biologists.

I wrote this reply. I am required to be nice at this place. I can't tell a Christian moron he's a moron.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for your answer. Usually I'm ignored.

You answered my question. You do not agree with my idea (and virtually all biologists. Notice the word "virtually") that evolution is a completely natural process. Therefore God is required for something, for example how it began. You are invoking your god of the gaps. Fine with me.

Competent scientists don't do that by the way. Their job is to find out what really happened. They know it's wrong to give up and invoke supernatural magic.

Some day a Christian might admit evolution does not require Mr. God's magical powers but I doubt it. The religious implications of evolution are too great and so God must be sticked in there somewhere.

Thanks again for your answer.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

Christianity is bullshit. The Magic Man is bullshit.

Christianity is totally ridiculous because it completely depends on the magical resurrection of a decomposing corpse. Besides being disgusting this fantasy is just plain impossible. Christianity is completely wrong about everything and it must be thrown out.
There are two reasons why the god fantasy needs to be thrown out.
  1. The god of the gaps has run out of hiding places thanks to scientific progress that will never end. A god fairy who never had anything to do is a fairy that doesn't exist.
  2. The idea there a magical being watching over us (or doing who knows what) is obviously a childish fantasy, equal to the Easter Bunny fantasy. Magic is not real therefore magic god fairies and magic rabbits are impossible.

What an atheist asked Christians. Even though I don't have the Christian disease I answered some of the questions.

"Since I could take anything, true or false, based on faith or presupposing it, it can't be a reasonable pathway to truth or god."
A big part of religious brainwashing (aka child abuse) is this idea repeated thousands of times: "You must have faith."
In other words you must believe any idiotic fantasy that makes you feel good even if it has not one shred of evidence.
A biologist at the University of Minnesota had something to say about faith:
"No one word personifies the absolute worst and most wicked properties of religion better than that. Faith is mind-rot. It’s the poison that destroys critical thinking, undermines evidence, and leads people into lives dedicated to absurdity. It’s a parasite regarded as a virtue." -- PZ Myers
"Religion is the antithesis of science, an anesthetic for the mind that disables critical thought and encourages the acceptance of inanity as fact, and wishful thinking as evidence." -- PZ Myers
"Without god there is no morality."
That's ridiculous because I never met a Christian who had any moral values.
Normal people, aka atheists, have a brain so they can figure things out. It's everyone's best interest to be civilized. I don't need a magic god fairy to figure that out. This is not rocket science.
"God is revealing himself to you. You just aren't looking/are denying him."
The only possible explanation for this idea is brain damage.

It's impossible to be more fucking stupid than America's cowardly Christian retards. What I wrote for one those stupid fucking assholes for Jeebus.

i think it is general Christian doctrine that all people are sinners, thus all people are not good, and therefore all people need salvation.
"i think it is general Christian doctrine that all people are sinners, thus all people are not good, and therefore all people need salvation."
"Sinners" is a religious word. Normal people don't use it. The idea that all people are not good is ridiculous. The vast majority of us human apes are civilized and help other people every chance they get.
The salvation thing is ridiculous. Dead people stay dead. They don't have a magical soul that magically flies to a magical paradise where cowards can have a magical 2nd life. Besides being childish this fantasy is completely impossible. Magic is not real. Wishful thinking does not make reality go away.
The choice is accept reality or have a cowardly fear of reality. Take your pick.
I would rather not waste the rest of my life being a coward who can't exist without the moronic 2nd life fantasy.

More burning stupid from Idiot America. This is typical. A religious fucktard thinks normal people, aka atheists, are required to disprove the magic god fairy's magical powers. What I wrote for fucking moron:

"However the number of atheists who will claim no god and refuse to defend that position is huge."
Atheism is an acceptance of reality. Reality does not need to be defended.
The Magic Man is your fantasy. It's not our job to disprove your invisible friend. It's your job to provide evidence for it. Of course you have nothing but your wishful thinking and it's obvious you know virtually nothing about science which has repeatedly shown your fairy's magic wand was never necessary for anything.
You theists have no idea how childish and idiotic your magic god fairy is. Hint: Your fairy is equal the Easter Bunny. That's how childish and moronic and ridiculous your fantasy is.
Theism is a denial of reality. It's for feeble-minded cowards.
In a world of never ending religious violence, religious brainwashing, and religious stupidity, it's immoral to believe in god bullshit.

There is a lot of burning stupid in Idiot America. A Christian Fucktard wrote about the magical resurrection of the Magic Jeebus Man: "I have no reason to doubt him." This is what I wrote.

I have no reason to doubt him.
Except for the obvious fact that dead witnesses are not evidence for anything. Also the Bible is not evidence for anything.
A magical resurrection of a decomposing corpse is impossible therefore it never happened. The vast majority of people on this planet agree. It never happened.
Believing in anti-reality nonsense that has zero real evidence is ridiculous. You're wasting your life being completely wrong about everything. Perhaps you don't care because your disgusting fantasy makes you feel good.

Saturday, July 15, 2017

I discovered a very interesting website: "God is imaginary"

https://godisimaginary.com/index.htm

Proof #18 - Imagine heaven

How will we change the world, so that it becomes rational rather than religious?

--------------------------------------------------

This blog was closed to the public for a very long time. Now anyone can see it and comments are allowed. This blog was very popular. Unfortunately today nobody knows about this place being available.

If you find this place I suggest look at the old stuff which is more interesting than the new stuff. Please leave a comment anywhere so I know someone was here.

--------------------------------------------------

This is an excellent blog: https://lutherwasnotbornagaincom.wordpress.com/blog/

I plan to watch this 39 minute video about the Magic Jeebus Man later.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6phUjAXqCT4&t=25s

https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAtheism/comments/6nbbf1/did_the_gospels_paint_jesus_as_prophet_or_cult/

In Idiot America millions of morons read the moronic bible and nothing else. The stupid, it burns.

We know Genesis is a childish fantasy for science deniers. There is no reason to pretend the rest of the disgusting idiotic bible has any value.
"If anything is absolutely, rock-bottom true, it’s that life evolved, beginning about 4 billion years ago, and that the creation myth of Genesis is completely wrong." -- Jerry Coyne, University of Chicago biologist
The word of the Magic Man? That's ridiculous. If the god fairy wrote this gibberish then the fairy is an idiot, an idiot who loves genocide.
In a vast universe of countless trillions of solar systems the magical master of the whole thing is going to write or inspire the most idiotic book ever written for this tiny insignificant planet in the middle of nowhere. Some people will believe any moronic nonsense that makes them feel good.

Friday, July 14, 2017

Christian scum have the moral values of a terrorist.

An interesting fact. While Charles Darwin spoke out strongly against slavery American Christians invoked their Bible to justify slavery.
An interesting thing I noticed: Christians have no moral values at all. When they're not defending slavery they're sticking their nose into other people's private lives, they're brainwashing children (and other people's children when they can get away with it), they have zero respect for the Establishment Clause of the United States Bill of Rights, they're constantly telling biology teachers how to do their jobs because they don't like evolution, they have no problem with destroying the environment and other species if it's lucrative to do that, and they like to threaten people ("my loving god will torture you forever").
A book I'm reading: "The Dark Side Of Christian History" by Helen Ellerbe.

FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES: At Site of Scopes Trial, Darrow Statue Belatedly Joins Bryan’s By RICHARD FAUSSET A test of Bible Belt tolerance: Can the town of the Scopes “monkey trial” stomach a new statue of the famed agnostic lawyer Clarence Darrow?

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/14/us/darrow-bryan-dayton-tennessee-scopes-statues.html

What I wrote for a bible thumping moron who believes the decomposing corpse of the Magic Jeebus Man magically became a zombie (or whatever these idiots think it is).

I'm impressed by your knowledge of what you read in the Bible. However there is a reason the vast majority of people on this planet don't believe it. That reason is very simple. Decomposing corpses do not "rise from the dead". It's impossible.
This is called reality. Reality can't be thrown out. Therefore Christianity must be thrown out because it's totally wrong.
--------------------------------------------------
The stupid. It burns.

--------------------------------------------------

THIS IS WHAT THE RETARD WROTE BEFORE I WROTE MY COMMENT:

Accounts prove no author corroboration or hoax
The distinction of account affirms no corroboration or copying of information by the multiple authors. This strongly opposes the idea of planned deception or hoax on the part of the followers of christ.
Yet they all attest to recognize Christ's resurrection as the chief cornerstone of all that Christianity claims to be. 
What then appear to be the suggested problems with aligning the sequencing of these accounts?
Two of the account offer allotted margin by virtue of their uniqueness of location and apparent time spend covered. 
One is Luke's Emmaus appearance and following events. The road appearance is accounted as distinct and separate from the tomb sequences. The appearance happens with two on the road, v.24:13-15; Jesus eats with them, v.30; they returned to Jerusalem and find the eleven. v.33. 
Second is Paul's account. This presents Jesus' appearances over an apparent longer period of time than do the Gospel accounts. The use of the word 'then' in the first phrase of 1 Cor. 15:5, as if to imply 'next' is the particle 'eita' which means either 'then' or ' furthermore'. The next word translated 'then', v.6, 'epeita' means 'thereafter', 'After that the He appeared to more than 500 brethren . . . then He appeared to James, then to all the Apostles . . .and last of all to Paul. v.5-8 
There are clues given relating to a range of time Paul's accounts may cover. One detail is his reference to James and all the apostles. Here he does not refer to them as Jesus' disciples.
This suggests a time frame in which at least the eleven, including James, had become known as the Apostles of Jesus not simply as His disciples. This would suggest a post-Pentecost identity. v.6,7. 
By contrast, the prior verse imply pre-Pentecost appearances v.5, since it refers to the group as disciples Cephas and the twelve, and not as Apostles in v.6-7. 
These and other distinctions suggest that Paul's accounts are spread over a longer period of time than just the pre-Pentecost appearances in the Gospels.
We now come to the accounts of Matthew and John. Both begin by listing two women, or a woman, and next the eleven disciples. 
The matthew account reveals Mary Magdalene and another Mary at the tomb. Then Jesus appeared to them and has them carry a message to the disciples to leave for Galilee and they would see Him there. (mt. 28:10) This correlates with the later John 21 sitting of Jesus in Galilee. It also strongly suggests a direct prediction in the Matthew's account of a sitting on a mountain in Galilee, mt. 28:16-20.
By comparison, John's account specifies Mary Magdalene only at the tomb. This account could well have mentioned only Mary M. out of the two women who visits the tomb in Matthew. Then Jesus' appears to the eleven as found in both Matt, and John.
This leaves the appearance of Jesus in the John 20 sequence; M. Magdalene early at tomb still dark v.1; ran, to Peter and disciples, v.2; Peter and (John) run to tomb, v.4; The disciples go back ('to own homes'. not in Greek text) Jerusalem implied; v.10; Jesus appears to disciples in locked room, v.19; thomas absent, v.24; 8 days later Jesus appears again in the room, v.26; then the Galilean appearances, 20:1-23.
It is apparent the account in John offers much more detail about the events in and around Jerusalem and in Galilee then any of the other accounts. 
The accounts, however, show no glaring discrepancies in its general conveyances nor contradictions in the sequence of geographic relocations that take place between Jerusalem and Galilee. 
Therefore, it appears that the flow of information in the Gospel accounts resonate well within the context of events surrounding the resurrection. As could be expected, some give more detail than others.
The Pauline account appears to apply to a broader period of time as the context and terms used for 'Jesus' followers suggest. 
Furthermore, even Jesus' most ferocious enemies, whose headquarters were in Jerusalem, could not produce a corpse that was beaten, crucified and mutilated enough to even be faked to pass for the body of Jesus. 
Be assured, they would have payed far more than the thirty pieces of silver offered for the capture of His living body to have been handed the remains of His dead body. To their greatest dismay, this never happened.

Typical Muslim scum: A woman's brother murdered her because she dressed like a real woman instead of wearing a black tent.

If you're a Muslim get off my planet you stupid fucking retard.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/jul/18/dishonourable-killing-qandeel-baloch-pakistan-social-media-brother

"Pakistani police say the brother of killed model Qandeel Baloch has confessed to strangling her to death for 'family honour' because she posted 'shameful' pictures on Facebook."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/17/qandeel-baloch-brother-admits-killing-her-say-pakistani-police

Thursday, July 13, 2017

The decomposing corpse of the Magic Jeebus Man did not magically resurrect itself. What I wrote about Christian retards at Reddit.

Dead witnesses are not evidence for anything.

The magical resurrection of a decomposing corpse never happened because it's impossible. This is call "reality". Christians for some reason don't like reality so they threw reality out.

Unfortunately for Christians reality doesn't care what they think. Reality is what it is and nothing can change it including wishful thinking.

Christianity is completely wrong about everything and it must be thrown out.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAChristian/comments/6n1zox/the_resurrection_appearance_reports_are/?sort=new

There is a lot of fucking stupid in Idiot America.

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

At Reddit I asked Christian retards a question. I expect to be either ignored or I will get a moronic answer.

"Weekly Ask a Christian"
It's nice to make that possible even though I will probably be ignored.
My question for Christians: Have you ever considered the possibility that you're wasting your life being completely wrong about everything?
It's obvious to me the Christian beliefs are just fantasies. Do Christians ever consider the obvious fact that a magical resurrection and a magical 2nd life are completely impossible?
Reality is a wonderful thing because it's interesting and because it's real. I don't understand why Christians want to throw reality out.

Once in my life I convinced a creationist to throw out the moronic magical creationism fantasy using evidence from ERVs.

I was able to convince a creationist to throw out creationism thanks to this evidence. He gave me some bullshit from the Christian Creationist Discovery Institute (aka Crackpot Central). According to those idiots the ERVs are functional. I explained it doesn't matter if they're functional or not. The point of the evidence is the ERVs are found at the exact same locations in the genome of chimpanzee apes and human apes.

He understood and said this was a problem for creationism and he asked for a book recommendation. I suggested Why Evolution Is True by Jerry Coyne and he said he would read it but he was not throwing out his magic god fairy. I said it doesn't matter. At least you're trying to understand evolution and that's wonderful. I congratulated him.

Every other attempt to explain science to these brain-dead science deniers failed. They don't understand because they don't want to understand.

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Comic strip about United Airlines

At Reddit I answered a question about religious stupidity.

"Ex-theists: What would you say brought you to your previous beliefs/religion?"

It's probably the same reason for most people who threw out religious stupidity. Brainwashing, aka child abuse. In my case it was ugly nuns from grade 1 to grade 8. "Christ died for your sins". I was forced to listen to that ridiculous nonsense thousands of times.

I threw out religion and I threw out the Magic Man because it's obviously a fantasy for feeble-minded cowards. Reality makes the god-soaked cry.

Not everyone has what it takes to grow up and throw out the bull-stuff. A brain is required.

Saturday, July 8, 2017

Priest Off

YouTube video: PRIEST OFF - one minute long

What I wrote and what other people wrote at Christian bullshit website.

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/2017/07/07/evangelizing-the-nones/#disqus_thread

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/jesuscreed/

UPDATE: All this stuff, everything below, was deleted. Christian assholes have to use censorship to defend their idiotic death cult.

What I wrote: 

"Evangelization is especially urgent as the ‘nones’ – the number of the population who do not identify with a religion, continues to grow, he said."

People who throw throw out religion have accepted reality. It's virtually impossible to get them to throw out reality.

I am by the way an atheist (100% certain magical beings are not real). I threw out the Catholic Church. Good riddance.

The numerous other religious cults are equally ridiculous. Supernatural is not real.
“There’s nothing more beautiful than the dying and rising of Jesus Christ.”

If Mr. Christ was dead for 3 days the smell must have been horrible. Of course the entire story was made up. I don't know why people believe this disgusting nonsense. It's totally impossible. Dead preachers stay dead. This is a basic fact of reality.

By the way science is called "science". Nobody calls it scientism unless they're science deniers.

Also, scientific progress and science education is killing religious cults. And that's a good thing.

WHAT OTHER PEOPLE WROTE:

Silly Bishop Barron. Does he not realize that most of us "Nones" in the US came from a religious background? We've experienced what he finds so wonderful, and find it odious.

"...show the beauty of Catholicism, and that has an evangelical power,...” like this:

http://www.bbc.com/news/wor...

http://www.wbur.org/news/20...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

etc, etc...

"...The goodness of radical Christians" is on display here:

http://www.chicagotribune.c...

"...show them Mother Teresa’s sisters at work."

Seriously? http://www.slate.com/articl...

Sorry, Bishop. Your Roman Catholic Church is proving itself completely irrelevant and worthy of scorn.

-----------------------------------------------

“There’s nothing more beautiful than the dying and rising of Jesus Christ,” he said

I most emphatically disagree. What can possibly be "beautiful" about human sacrifice?? And the fact that this obscene charade - he didn't even stay dead like a REAL dead guy, did he?? - is used to guilt-trip us into enslaving ourselves. NO THANKS! Did Jesus Christ *ask* me if I was okay with him sacrificing himself for me? NO! So how can his own voluntary choice - which, let's face it, ended up costing him *NOTHING*, got him a big promotion, and c'mon, he could have gotten out of it at any time, right? - somehow obligate me?? Jesus Christ needs to take responsibility for his choices like a mature adult and not expect everybody else to do stuff for him.

There are always research opportunities in every branch of science and that's a good thing.

Wikipedia: List of unsolved problems in biology

What I wrote at Reddit about cowardly Christians who fear reality.

Instead of being born again I suggest Christians should grow up and face facts.

Nobody has a magical 2nd life in a magical heaven because that's impossible. This is called "Reality".

Reality does not care about the people who fear it. Wishful thinking does not make reality go away.

A Christian might say "What if you're wrong?"

Reality is never wrong. Reality is not an opinion. I'm 100% certain reality is real. Anyone with a brain and the ability to use that brain can figure it out.

Friday, July 7, 2017

The pope is a fucking asshole.

The Vatican’s Failure in the Abuse Scandal - JULY 7, 2017

For all of Pope Francis’ deserved acclaim in leading the Roman Catholic Church to new directions, he is failing badly on his promise to address the child abuse scandal at the crucial level where ranking churchmen systematically protected priests who raped and molested children.

His failure to confront the problem was underlined last week when the pope had to grant one of his closest advisers, Cardinal George Pell of Australia, a leave of absence from the Vatican to answer multiple charges of sexual assault in Melbourne.

Until now, Francis stood by Cardinal Pell, the Vatican treasurer, even after the cardinal admitted to a special Australian investigation last year that the church had made “enormous mistakes” in responding to the scandal while he was a ranking archbishop. But the cardinal denied any memory of priests who were abusers, or of covering up their criminal behavior, as critics charged. Some priests convicted of crimes, however, testified that Cardinal Pell did know of their activity. Heading home, the cardinal, who in the past denied allegations of molesting children as a young priest, said he expected to prove his innocence of the assault charges.

The cardinal’s deepening involvement is a severe blow to the Vatican and the pope as they try to convince the world that the scandal has ebbed with a supposedly full and forthright accounting. But while more than 800 rogue priests have been defrocked and some sent to prison, diocesan and parish superiors have largely been spared sanctions and discipline. This, despite their having abetted violators by rotating them to new parishes and concealing serial child abuse from civil authorities. Australian investigators uncovered more than 4,400 victims across a 35-year period and at least 1,880 individuals suspected of being abusers, most of them priests and religious brothers.

Last year, Francis denounced “the sin of covering up and denial.” He had promised reform in 2015, including the creation of a tribunal to try accused bishops, but last year he backed away from the promise under reported pressure by church officials in Rome. He assigned the task instead to the Vatican’s murky bureaucracy, considerably muting hope for a just and public accounting. Catholic Whistleblowers, a group of priests, nuns and other advocates for victims of abuse, said it had sent the Vatican documentation on three particularly egregious prelates among dozens under suspicion, and heard nothing back.

Other critics have been skeptical of the pope’s promise to discipline bishops guilty of cover-ups. Francis provoked outrage in Chile by appointing the Rev. Juan Barros as a bishop, despite his closeness to a notorious serial abuser who had been defrocked by the Vatican. The pope was later caught on videotape dismissing objectors as “stupid” and “leftists.” Now Francis is without a trusted adviser because of a scandal he has failed to confront at the highest levels.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/07/opinion/pope-francis-catholic-church-sexual-abuse.html

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

Christian assholes and Muslim assholes teach their children (victims) how to be stupid.

Why do Christians (and Muslims) brainwash children before they're old enough to think for themselves?

-----------------------------

A moron's reply:

The shortest answer is "they don't" and the question is sort of like asking "why do you beat your wife?" You are implying guilt without justification.

But assuming the best interpretation I will rephrase it "Why do Christians (and Muslims) teach their children to believe in their religion they're old enough to think for themselves?"

The short answer here is that we do this, largely, because like everyone else we love our children and want to teach them the truth about the world as soon as possible so that they will be equipped to face the world as it actually is. Compare teaching faith to teaching a child to brush their teeth. One could let a child wait until they are old enough to decide for themselves if they want to brush their teeth but if you did this the effects of the decision would be long lasting. So a loving parent teaches their children the truth about God and teaches their children to brush their teeth. It is well known by parents then when given their own power to decide some will turn away from God and some will stop brushing their teeth... but that sort of thing is out of the control of parents and so they simply do the best they can with the time they have.

-----------------------------

Thanks for your reply. I usually get ignored. So this is progress.

I wouldn't compare teaching a child about your religion to teaching them how to stay healthy.

In my opinion the real reason for the religious brainwashing before the victims are old enough to think for themselves, is if you let them grow up first, they will never believe the Christian nonsense for example the totally ridiculous (not to mention impossible) resurrection of a decomposing corpse.

Also, I have seen this explained by a Christian who admitted it was very important to not let their victims grow up before trying to indoctrinate them.

You are not just Christian. You're Evangelical. This means you have probably thrown out human evolution. Your victims learn nothing about how the world works.

Fine with me. It's not my problem. I just hope you realize your children might think you're insane after they go to a university, which can be avoided by forcing them to go to a worthless Christian college.

There is no hope for this country. The brainwashing will never end. The brainwashed will grow up to be brainwashers.

Tuesday, July 4, 2017

What I wrote at Reddit about creationist retards.

"What are your best arguments against evolution?"
I usually see something like this: "Complexity therefore the Magic Man did it."
I have this idea about evolution deniers (aka creationists because they think every species was magically created out of nothing).
My idea is this: Creationists are just plain stupid, not to mention lazy. Their other problem is all the curiosity they were born with was sucked out of them thanks to the child abuse called religious indoctrination. When they grow up to be adult idiots they repeat the same child abuse that makes children stupid.
An interesting thing about the extremely stupid creationists: They "know" they're right about everything. They know evolution doesn't work. They know all species were magically created out of nothing.
The laziness: Never once in their pathetic worthless lives have they ever studied anything written by real scientists. They get 100% of their dishonest stupidity from professional idiots, aka liars for the Magic Jeebus Man.
The science deniers have the Islamic State terrorists on their side.
What I wrote might not be politically correct. We are suppose to be nice to idiots. However everything I wrote is obviously true. These people might have a brain but they never learned how to use it.

Sunday, July 2, 2017

The stupid. The burning out of control stupid. What a fucking moron wrote and what I wrote at Reddit.


[–]ChristianConspiratorChristian, Creationist [score hidden]  
According to some, a fusion may have happened in humans sometime between Adam and Noah, maybe even as a consequence of the fall. The number of chromosomes being the same before a hypothetical fusion doesn't imply a relationship unless you think we're also closely related to rabbits and potatoes.
But the problem is worse than that, since there is extremely scant evidence of a fusion to begin with, the data is generally massaged to fit the theory. From what I understand, one would expect thousands of bases characteristic of telomeres in succession, with a point around which they would be mirrored.
That's not what is found. Researchers have had to cheat by looking for mirrored or non mirrored sections on both sides of the supposed fusion; when they do that they find less than 1% of what one might expect, with an onus to explain how sequences mysteriously got to the other side or reversed. Great evidence for evolution right?
When they cheat even more and look for sequences that are "close", they find something like 2% of what you might expect. Combine this with the fact that there are several genes in the supposed fusion region where as far as I know genes have never been discovered in telomeres, you have very poor evidence for evolution.
It gets worse of course, since there is effectively zero evidence of the two centromeres that should have existed, nor of the ability for the centromere to somehow switch to the right location where it is now.
All in all, the evidence looks bad, but evolution is predominantly a product of the imagination rather than the evidence. I don't have a vibrant enough imagination to accept the countless hypothetical scenarios of evolution without good evidence they could have happened.