There is so much stupidity out there. Most people are morons.

An idiot wrote, "Atheists don't say 'there is no God'?"

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

I wrote this: Bullshit. I'm 100% certain your magic god fairy fantasy is impossible for the same reason I'm 100% certain your magic Easter Bunny is impossible. There is no magic in the universe.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

A moron atheist wrote this bullshit: "Atheists don't claim there is no God".

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

I wrote this for the stupid asshole: That's ridiculous. Normal people know there are not any god fairies out there. You're a wimpy fake atheist. You wimps have my contempt. The stupid, it burns.

One more time to help wimpy atheists understand why they're so fucking stupid.

Someone else asked this question:

Atheists who say "I lack belief in God": why don't you tell us of the other things you lack, such as your lack of original thoughts as well?

I wrote this answer:

"I lack belief in God"

I agree this is ridiculous. These are not real atheists. A real atheist is 100% certain magic-god-fairies and Easter Bunnies are not real. "Lack of belief" is the most idiotic thing ever invented. They're for atheist wimps. They disgrace atheism.

I have been looking at the other answers. Most of the atheists here are wimps. They don't understand what a real atheist is. "Lack of belief" is for wimpy wimps.

Wimpy atheist: "Duh, I have a lack of belief in Easter Bunnies, duh."

You disgusting wimps have my contempt.

The morons who suck up to Christians are stupid fucking assholes.

Fucktard:

They have been indoctrinated by the extremist sects and cults to believe that God was not clever enough to use the big bang, evolution, and science as his tools!
-- Nous

What I wrote for the fucktard:

Nous, sticking a god fairy into science is ridiculous.

I wrote about this before. One more time to help wimpy idiots understand.

I see this bullshit a lot: "Atheism is the lack of belief in gods."

Would these wimps say they have a lack of belief in Easter Bunnies? I hope they're not that stupid. A lack of belief in gods is equally ridiculous.

A real atheist is 100% certain god fairies and Easter Bunnies are not real.

How fucking hard is that to understand?

The wimps disgrace atheism. They are part of the religious stupidity problem. They have my contempt.

I wrote this for cowardly Christian morons.

Do you agree or disagree with what I wrote here about atheism and theism?

Atheism is an acceptance of reality. Theism is an acceptance of childish nonsense that makes cowards feel good.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Some wimpy atheists think everyone should suck up to Christians who brainwash children and attack science education.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Best answer:

Absolutely, I fully agree.

I'm an Atheist and Hence they send people like me to fight their religious wars for them. (There's nothing quite like the truth is there.)

Per Mare Per Terram

-- Veschengro

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

The Latin motto "Per Mare Per Terram" translates into English as "By Sea By Land".

Founded	28 October 1664
Country	United Kingdom[note 1]
Type	Marines
Role	Expeditionary & amphibious warfare Arctic warfare Force Protection
Size	7,760 Royal Marines 750 Royal Marines Reserve
Part of	Royal Navy
Naval staff offices	Whitehall, London, England
Nickname(s)	"Royals" "Bootnecks" "The Commandos" "Jollies"
Motto(s)	"Per Mare, Per Terram" (Latin) "By Sea, By Land"
Colours	Royal Navy Blue, Old Gold, Light Infantry Green, Drummer Red
March	Quick: "A Life on the Ocean Wave" Slow: "Preobrajensky"
Engagements	List[show]
Website	www.royalnavy.mod.uk/our-organisation/the-fighting-arms/royal-marines
Commanders
Captain General	The Duke of Sussex[1] (suspended duties)
First Sea Lord	Admiral Tony Radakin
Commandant General	Major General Matthew Holmes[2]
Insignia
Non‑ceremonial flag
Commando flash

Idiot America is infested with atheist wimps.

A wimpy atheist fucktard wrote this bullshit:

"I'm an atheist, and so I think Theistic Evolution is wrong, but you know what...it's WAY better than the alternative. A Theistic Evolution philosophy and a God of the Gaps approach to theism allows religion and science to coexist. And as far as I'm concerned, that's a win."

This stupid fucking asshole thinks it's OK to stick magic into science. This wimpy atheist is part of the religious stupidity problem. Get off my planet you fucking retard.

Gallup Poll - JULY 26, 2019

40% of Americans: The Magic Man magically created people within the past 10,000 years.

33% of Americans: The Magic Man is one of the mechanisms of evolution.

22% of Americans: People evolved thanks to evolution by natural selection and the Magic Man had absolutely nothing to do with it.

5% of Americans: "Duh, what's an evolution, duh."

This means only 22% of Americans accept the most important fact of science and they don't stick a god fairy into it. This is disgraceful. And the wimpy atheist has no problem with this stupidity. He says stick the god fairy into it, I don't care. What a stupid fucking wimpy asshole. These wimpy atheist morons disgrace atheism.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

There is another kind of atheist wimp.

Wikipedia - Atheism

"Atheism is, in the broadest sense, an absence of belief in the existence of deities. Less broadly, atheism is a rejection of the belief that any deities exist. In an even narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities."

An atheist wimp would say he or she has an absence of belief in the existence of deities.

Do these wimpy fucking morons say they have an absence of belief in the existence of Easter Bunnies?

Probably not unless they're even more fucking stupid than I thought they were.

A real atheist is 100% certain magic god fairies and Easter Bunnies and leprechauns are impossible and they don't exist.

There are real atheists. Everyone else is a fucking retard.

I asked a question about the Magic Man and the Easter Bunny.

Could you please give me your reasons why the ridiculous childish god fantasy is impossible?

This is my explanation: The magic god fairy is impossible for the same reason the Easter Bunny is impossible. There is no magic in the universe.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Most of the answers were stupid. For example a fucktard wrote, "It is impossible to prove that an abstract god is impossible."

That's bullshit because I just proved it. What part of "There is no magic in the universe" does the wimpy atheist not understand?

Would the atheist wimp say "It is impossible to prove that the Easter Bunny is impossible."

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

This answer was well done:

"There is only one reason: imaginary god creatures ARE NOT REAL and DO NOT EXIST. It's a simple fact, and it won't change, no matter how badly believers want their gods to be real. Tolkien invented a whole world - Middle Earth - but just because he did that, we don't have to assume it's real until proven otherwise. Same for all the gods that man has invented. They simply are not real and nothing will change that."

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Somebody provided this interesting stuff: 101 Contradictions in the Bible and RationalWiki - Biblical scientific errors

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

"I've never seen any god do anything. I've always been surrounded by Christians, and none of them has ever claimed to have seen their god do anything. That is good evidence that there is no god. Religion is just words--words from liars."

"Gnostic atheism" is ridiculous.

Wikipedia

Agnostic atheism is a philosophical position that encompasses both atheism and agnosticism. Agnostic atheists are atheistic because they do not hold a belief in the existence of any deity, and are agnostic because they claim that the existence of a deity is either unknowable in principle or currently unknown in fact.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Gnostic atheism: "I do not know, but I do not believe there is any God."

That's ridiculous.

"I do not know, but I do not believe there is any Easter Bunny."

That's equally ridiculous.

I'm am 100% certain magic god fairies and magic rabbits are not real.

The word "atheism" does not require any adjectives. You are either a real atheist (100% certain gods are not real because they're fucking impossible) or you're a fucking retard.

Anyone who is not 100% certain magic god fairies are impossible, is an idiot.

Wikipedia:

Positive atheism (also called "strong atheism" and "hard atheism") is a form of atheism that asserts that no deities exist. The strong atheist explicitly asserts the non-existence of gods.

Atheist wimps are fucking morons. I answered a question about them.

"To my fellow atheists ----- I KNOW no god things exist. No ifs, buts or maybes. THEY DON'T EXIST. Why do you disagree with this statement?"

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

We agree about everything. I'm 100% certain magic god fairies and Easter Bunnies are impossible. There is no magic in the universe. Period. There is nothing more to say about it.

Unfortunately, there are wimpy fake atheists who are not real atheists. The wimps are part of the religious stupidity problem. They have my contempt.

About 8 years ago PZ wrote this stuff about atheist wimps.

But here’s a central issue of contention: FAITH. No one word personifies the absolute worst and most wicked properties of religion better than that. Faith is mind-rot. It’s the poison that destroys critical thinking, undermines evidence, and leads people into lives dedicated to absurdity. It’s a parasite regarded as a virtue. I speak as a representative of the scientific faction of atheism: it’s one thing we simply cannot compromise on. Faith is wrong.

So then we see this one subgroup of atheists and humanists cheerfully endorsing the umbrella of “interfaith” and it drives us into a rage: it’s a betrayal. It’s an abandonment of a core principle of our atheism. We wonder what the heck is wrong with these people — it’s like being a dedicated pacifist and seeing like-minded war haters working with the Pentagon and saying good things about military drones.

Click the link to see the rest of it: https://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/03/01/those-sleazy-lying-harvard-humanists/

Wimpy atheists are stupid fucking assholes.

I would call this one of my best posts. It's about wimpy atheists. I wrote this 9 years ago. Please click the link:

http://darwinkilledgod.blogspot.com/2011/08/worthless-wimpy-atheist-thinks-sucking.html

There are real atheists and there are wimpy atheists. The wimps are just plain fucking stupid.

Atheism is an acceptance of reality.

A real atheist is 100% certain magic god fairies and Easter Bunnies are not real because they are impossible.

One more thing: Only a wimp would write this moronic bullshit: "absence of belief".

Would this moron say he has an absence of belief in Easter Bunnies?

These wimpy atheists have my contempt.

Somebody with the internet name "Nixelplix" copied & pasted lots of evolution stuff from this blog and that's a good thing. That's what this blog is for.

https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/creationish-vs-evolutionism-be-polite.1046605/page-23

https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/creationish-vs-evolutionism-be-polite.1046605/page-24

To get this one I had to write down an entire Ken Miller speech which before could only be listened to:

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

I believe in evolution. In America that's a controversial statement. More than half of us reject the theory of evolution, and for some, it's not only wrong, but the source of nearly everything that's wrong with society today. But to a biologist like me evolution isn't politics or sociology. It's a scientific idea. And it might just be the best scientific idea ever.

Darwin's great insight was that the living world today holds the key to our biological past. The fact that he worked in an age before genetics, before the discovery of radioactivity, before the identification of even a single pre-human fossil, makes his work that much more remarkable. Darwin didn't know about the gene, but today we trace the ways in which genes themselves produce evolutionary change. Darwin didn't know about DNA, but today we follow the course of evolution thru our own DNA and the story is unmistakable. Like everything else on this planet, we evolved.

The objections often raised against evolution, like the age of the earth, or their so called gaps in the fossil record, are remarkably easy to answer. And I've done that many times, in books and lectures and twice, even in a federal court. But the evidence isn't what really bothers most Americans about evolution. What bugs them is that evolution says something they just don't want to hear. Namely, that we not only live in a natural world, but we are part of it, we emerged from it, or more accurately, we emerged with it. To them that means we are just animals. Our lives are an accident, our existence is without purpose, meaning, or value. My concern for those who hold that view, isn't just that they are wrong on science, wrong about the nature of the evidence, and mistaken on a fundamental point of biology, it's that they are missing something grand and beautiful and personally enriching.

Evolution isn't just a story about where we came from. It's an epic at the center of life itself. Far from robbing our lives of meaning, it instills an appreciation for the beautiful, enduring, and ultimately triumphant fabric of life that covers our planet, and even this beautiful little state, from the deep forests of Hope Valley to the rich aquatic life of Narragansett Bay.

Understanding that doesn't demean human life, it enhances it. We may be animals, but we are not just animals. We are the only ones who can truly appreciate, as Darwin put it, that there is grandeur in this view of life. And indeed there is.

To accept evolution isn't just to acknowledge the obvious, that the evidence behind it is overwhelming. It is to open one's eyes to the endless beauty that life has generated and continues to produce. It is to become a knowing participant in the truest sense, in the living world of which we are all a part.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Ken Miller, when he's not defending the established truth of evolution, is a Catholic.

Real Catholics have to believe in the magical resurrection of the Magic Jeebus Man. Believing that bullshit requires extreme stupidity, so it would be impossible for Miller to believe any of it, and I don't think he ever talked about it.

I think he pretends to be a Catholic because it helps him sell books. If he really believes in a Magic Man, then he believes in a god fairy who never had to wave its magic wand.

It would be impossible for an honest person who isn't insane to accept evolution and still think there's a magical creature hiding somewhere in the universe.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

The 2 links I provided are worth looking at.

At least one wimpy atheist complained about people who ridicule religious fucktards, as if everyone should suck up to extreme stupidity. I have zero respect for wimps.

I found some bullshit about "theistic evolution". Stupid fucking assholes for Jeebus think they can stick theism into science.

There is nothing theistic about science, especially evolution. Only a stupid fucking asshole would call evolution theistic.

Christian morons need to stick their god fairy into evolution because they know their disgusting cults would have to be thrown out if their fairy had nothing to do with the development of new species.

The bullshit I found had something about magical creationism which is of course totally insane. It means "The Magic Man did it."

The article also had something about magical intelligent design creationism. The dishonest assholes who try to sell this bullshit like to pretend their ideas are scientific even though everyone knows they are defending their childish "The Magic Man did it." These fucking assholes don't even know what science is.

The article complained about what they called "materialism". "Materialism is the belief that only material things exist and, further, that scientists are the sole producers of knowledge. Anything that is not scientific is fiction, accordingly. Religious belief is fiction, according to this ideology."

What the moron called "materialism" is not a belief. It's called reality. Reality is not a belief.

The only people who have beliefs are the god-soaked assholes who believe in any bullshit that makes cowardly morons feel good.

The bullshit article recommends the "Clergy Letter Project website". I have seen that bullshit website. It has preachers trying to stick their dead Magic Jeebus Man into science. It's full of stupidity.

The asshole who wrote this article called atheism an "ideology". Atheism is not an ideology. It's reality.

I'm 100% certain the Easter Bunny is not real. Is that an "ideology" or is it reality?

Same thing for the magical creature who hides somewhere in the universe and the thing loves us. It's bullshit, just like the Easter Bunny is bullshit.

Here is the whole thing if you're interested in bullshit: https://luthscitech.org/fighting-over-evolution-why/

There are wimpy atheists who suck up to Christians who stick their magic god fairy into science. These wimps have my contempt. The idea that science requires supernatural magic is bullshit and it should never be tolerated.

Here in Idiot America, only 19% of Americans accept evolution as a completely natural process, no fairies required. That's disgraceful. There is no reason to suck up to the other 81%. They're fucking insane and they need to be repeatedly told their insane.

The god thing is good for nothing but brainwashing, violence, and extreme stupidity.

Wimpy atheists are part of the religious stupidity problem. They have my contempt.

A wimpy atheist wrote: "Respect everyone no matter their beliefs."

This is what I wrote for the wimpy wimp:

These assholes for Jeebus brainwash children. This is child abuse. Do you think I should respect childish abuse? Muslims blow themselves up to kill women and children. Should I respect that? Grow up FFS.

One more time to help wimpy atheists and agnostic fucktards understand:

"Atheists, is it a fact or opinion that God does not exist?"

I'm 100% certain magic god fairies and Easter Bunnies are not real. These childish fantasies are impossible. There is no magic in the universe.

Anyone who isn't a hardcore atheist is a fucking moron.

UPDATE:

A wimpy atheist wrote: "We make no claims as to the existence or non-existence of gods."

I wrote this for the wimpy wimp:

Did you see what I wrote? I'm 100% certain magic god fairies are not real. How hard is it to figure that out? Do you make no claims about the existence or non-existence of Easter Bunnies?

You wimpy fucktards disgrace atheism.

It's not enough to convince Christian creationists to accept evolution. They need to throw out their moronic anti-science fantasies.

"The first thing to notice is that Mooney and Kirshenbaum are confused about the nature of the problem. The goal is not to get more Americans to merely accept the truth of evolution (or any other scientific theory); the goal is to get them to value the principles of reasoning and educated discourse that now make a belief in evolution obligatory. Doubt about evolution is merely a symptom of an underlying problem; the problem is faith itself—conviction without sufficient reason, hope mistaken for knowledge, bad ideas protected from good ones, good ideas occluded by bad ones, wishful thinking elevated to a principle of salvation, etc. Mooney and Kirshenbaum seem to imagine that we can get people to value intellectual honesty by lying to them."

-- Sam Harris

There are wimpy atheists and there are real atheists.

Somebody asked a good question and I answered it.

"I know for a fact that no god(s) exist. What does this make me? I'm not an atheist since atheism is when you BELIEVE there is no god, but in my case, I KNOW there is no god. What is that called (besides 'sensible')?"

If you are 100% certain magic god fairies and Easter Bunnies are not real, you are a "normal person" and a "hardcore atheist" and a "real atheist".

Today I'm reading some very interesting stuff about evolution at the National Academy of Sciences.

Evolution and the Nature of Science

Unfortunately, the National Academy of Sciences has decided to be very dishonest about something and there is no excuse for it.

They wrote ridiculous bullshit:

"Acceptance of the evidence for evolution can be compatible with religious faith."

In other words "Science can be compatible with insane bullshit."

I have a name for the idiots who sell this bullshit: "Atheist wimps", also "Fucking liars".

The idea is to suck up to insane Christian assholes who like to stick their Magic Jeebus Man into science. The National Academy of Sciences has decided dishonestly is a good thing.

The correct thing to do when writing about science is to completely ignore supernatural magical bullshit. I have zero respect for liars. There is no excuse for being dishonest.