Showing posts with label 2017/01 JANUARY. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2017/01 JANUARY. Show all posts

Monday, January 30, 2017

At the Wall Street Journal I wrote a comment about Muslim scum.

BBC News: "The president of the mosque, Mohamed Yangui - who was not inside at the time - said the shooting had happened in the men's section of the mosque."
They keep men and women separate. Muslim men are afraid of Muslim women.
Another website said the murderer was saying Allahu Akbar. This was Islamic terrorism. The problem that will never end is Islam.
Thank you President Trump for not letting these people get in.

I wrote this at a website infested with liberals but I did not publish it because I figured I would be harassed about it until the end of time. Liberal crybabies never stop crying.

I seen this here and elsewhere: "Trump will be impeached"

Just because some people disagree with his ideas is not a good reason to impeach a president who won the election.

The liberals lost. Elections have consequences. I suggest the liberals fix their problems because they were wiped out in 2016. Complaining about everything did not work. Time to try something else.

Wimps who suck up to retards.

THIS IS WHAT I WROTE:

"Calling them sick and stupid isn't going to help."

I never once used the word "stupid" here. It's wrong, it's not allowed here, and I don't do that.

What is going to help? Nothing. You have seen for yourself this person refuses to do anything to understand. He's a total waste of time, as are all science deniers. They really do have a disease and it really is incurable.

It's like teaching a dog how to play chess. The only difference is the dog has an excuse. The science deniers have no excuse for their extreme laziness and being too cowardly to grow up, educate themselves, and face facts. Cowards will always be cowards. It's a total waste of time to help these disgusting worthless people.

THIS IS WHAT I WAS NOT ALLOWED TO WRITE BECAUSE THE FUCKING IDIOT WHO OWNS THE THREAD WOULD RATHER SUCK UP TO A FUCKING MORON. 1/30/2017. THESE ARE SUCKERS WHO LET CREATIONISTS WASTE THEIR TIME. THE STUPID, IT BURNS.

"your last post is inexcusable and unproductive"

Perhaps inappropriate but what I wrote is completely correct. I did not make anything up.

If you want to see comments that are extremely unproductive take a look everything every science denier wrote. With every word they prove I was right.

Sorry but I don't believe in censorship especially when I'm being censored. I respect freedom of speech, especially when it's my speech. Some people like to suppress freedom of speech. One way they do that is they say it's inexcusable and unproductive (which is just an opinion).

I would rather be thrown out instead of suppressing my own freedom of speech. Until then I will say what I want which has the advantage of being true. Unlike the science deniers you love so much, I don't make things up.

I HIT THE POST BUTTON AND I FIND OUT THE FUCKING ASSHOLE WON'T LET ME WRITE A COMMENT BECAUSE I DON'T SUCK UP TO RETARDS. SUCKUPS ARE WORSE THAN THE DIPSHITS THEY SUCK UP TO.

Sunday, January 29, 2017

I wrote this for an evolution denier, aka fucking moron. The stupid, it burns.

Why do you call magic "intelligent design"? Believe in childish anti-science nonsense if you want but at least be honest about it. You believe magic is real. Admit it.

Instead of showing off your total ignorance of evolution and your total refusal to learn anything about it, why don't you provide evidence for your childish magical fantasies? Lying about science is not evidence for magic. You can't say evolution wrong therefore magic. Even if evolution was not the strongest fact of science and the foundation of biology, that doesn't mean magic is real. You got to provide evidence for your magic. Let's have it. Maybe you can ask your fairy to loan you its magic wand so scientists can test it.

My point is you and all other science deniers are pathetic. Thinking makes them cry. Education hurts their brain.

FFS, this is the 21st century. Grow up and face facts.

And stop pretending there is a debate about the established truth of evolution. There is no debate. Just because you science deniers think there is a debate does not mean there is a debate. It only means you know nothing about mountains of evidence, powerful evidence that continues to grow every day, evidence you know nothing about because you're too lazy and too cowardly to educate yourself. FFS, look things up.

In Idiot America idiot parents and idiot teachers convince little girls they can't be brilliant.

Little Girls Doubt That Women Can Be Brilliant, Study Shows

Google images: Hominidae aka the Great Apes, human apes and our close Great Ape cousins.

Google images: Hominidae aka the Great Apes, including human apes of course.

Saturday, January 28, 2017

What I wrote about the brain-dead creationist retards:

Perhaps it's better to ignore the science deniers and the reason evolution makes them cry (religion). Perhaps it's better to pretend they don't exist. They know nothing. They are equal to dogs. Their opinions don't matter because they're idiots.
I have 5 books about evolution. The best of those 5 books is "Your Inner Fish, A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body" by Neil Shubin.
Mr. Shubin completely ignores the existence of religious science deniers and that's the way it should be.

Thursday, January 26, 2017

I wrote this at Amazon on 1/26/2017.

This is why I'm 100% certain the Magic Man (Zeus, Allah, God) is not real.

Even though some theists might deny it, all theists invoke the god of the gaps to justify the existence of their magic god fairy. That doesn't work.

We know all species evolved and we know all life shares a common ancestor. This is scientific fact. Also we know a god fairy had absolutely nothing to do with it.

If something as complex as the development of new species did not require a god fairy's magic wand, it's ridiculous to pretend the god fairy was ever necessary for anything else. A god fairy who never did anything is a fairy who doesn't exist.

Even without the science it's childish to pretend a magical being, aka a god, is hiding somewhere in the universe. If theists ever learned how to think they could figure these things out.

You people can believe any nonsense you want. I don't care. It's your wasted life.

https://www.amazon.com/forum/religion/ref=cm_cd_pg_oldest?_encoding=UTF8&authToken=&cdForum=Fx1M9TK6UGAX6EO&cdPage=1&cdSort=newest&cdThread=TxRIF65U6ZIN4N

About 6 years ago something about science deniers was written by a brilliant Australian. This is fantastic. Here it is:

A curious thing about creationists. I try to study the minds of these strange people, who still, 150 years after Alfred Wallace, retain the primitive mindset of the eighteenth century when people thought that animal species, including the naked ape, had been created, each in its own place, by a finger-pointing white-bearded figure in the sky. It is as if we still had, living among us, people who believed in phlogiston, or humors, or the heart as the seat of emotions; a glimpse back into a distant past of primitive ideas about the world around us.

So I study them, much as a time traveler visiting the Dark Ages might, or a traveler to the deepest Amazon finding a previously uncontacted tribe.

And in the case of creationists, these strange throwbacks living still among us, I try to see the world through their eyes, wonder what strange shadows that imperfect organ is throwing on to the retina of these good simple people as they struggle to come to grips with the realities of several hundred years of scientific advances.

Here is one for you. What do creationists see when they look in the evolutionary mirror? What do they see when they look at Chimpanzee or Gorilla? Do they see both as just another mammal, like Cat or Dog, Kangaroo or Opossum, Platypus or Echidna? Do they not see the close resemblances to us in the face, the expressions, the hands and feet, the body, the behavior, the movement, the social groups, the young? Do they not say, well, my cousin is a hairy man, but he is still my cousin? Do they not say there but for the grace of Darwin go we? That these close cousins just traveled a different path from an obviously identical starting point?

And looking at the faces of their cousins, are they not inspired to investigate further, find that the resemblance is not just skin deep but extends through brain and skeleton and into the most fundamental unit of evolution the DNA?

I mean it is one thing to believe that the old silverback in the sky created beasts of burden and sheep and cattle, obviously different to, and, from an anthropocentric view, inferior to, humans, as part of his reward of dominion over all as long as you didn’t eat of the “tree of evolutionary knowledge” scheme. But the bronze age sheepherders typing out the Old Testament on a piece of goatskin didn’t know about the great apes, or even the monkeys, which did not live around what the desert nomads thought of as the centre of the universe but which we now call the Middle East, a kind of evolutionary backwater with barely enough species known to fill a boat.

If there had been a band of gorillas living by the Dead Sea, or a band of chimpanzees living on the Mount of Olives, do you think one of the sheepherders might have modified the relevant bit of his creation mythology to read, “And then Yahweh created the great apes, and he took a rib from a chimpanzee and it became the first human”?

With that kind of mythology, one of Darwin’s early ancestors, say living in Ancient Athens, might well have been inspired to discover the reality of evolution long before Alfred Wallace. And in that case, would the primitive members of the Texas School Board still be demanding that creationism be taught? How long does it take for the blindingly obvious to be accepted?
-- David Horton

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

The breathtaking stupidity of American Christians and Muslim terrorists. What I wrote about them at another website:

The title of this post is "The Science of Evolution" so maybe it's OK to say something about the millions of dense Americans (not to mention thousands of terrorists) who want to throw out this science.
Their idea goes like this: Evolution is wrong therefore magical creation is how the world works. Everything is magical.
Besides being ridiculous, childish, insane, and idiotic, this idea has a very big problem. Evidence against evolution (imaginary evidence because there is absolutely zero evidence against this important branch of science) would not be evidence for something else.
If the extremely dense evolution deniers what to throw out evolution, they have to explain why any other idea is correct. They can't say "evolution is wrong therefore magic". They have to provide evidence for magic. For example can they test this magic? Do they have one shred of evidence for it? No. Of course not. It's a just a fantasy for cowards who fear reality.
Is there any cure for their disease? Almost always the answer is no. The brain damage can't be fixed.
When a uneducated coward complains about evolution I ask them "what is your explanation for the diversity of life?" When they say a fairy magically created every creature I tell them to get psychiatric help. Then I tell them to shove it because they are equal to dogs. Of course that's not being fair to dogs. Dogs have a brain.

Monday, January 23, 2017

I wrote this for a "The magic man did it" retard at the Wall Street Journal.

The difference between scientists and the religious reality deniers is scientists never invoke supernatural magic to solve scientific problems.
One of the advantages of being a normal person, aka atheist, is we don't have a reason to give up and say "The magic man did it." Atheists, who by the way are vast majority of the best scientists in the world, and even the rare religious scientists if they are competent, would never give up and say god did it. That's not science. It's called being lazy. Invoking a god fairy's magical powers is for people who have no curiosity. Curiosity is what makes scientific progress possible. Being lazy, giving up, and invoking a god, contributes nothing.

Sunday, January 22, 2017

Phylogeny

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylogenesis

Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Systematics

A little boy copied and pasted bullshit from an idiotic anti-science bible website but he did not provide a link. I looked it up. Found out it was Answers in Genesis. The stupid, it burns. This is what I wrote for the retard.

A google search showed something interesting. It took me 5 seconds to find it.
Twpsyn  copied and pasted his bullcrap from Answers in Genesis, also known as Answers in Stupidity. This is why the little boy will never learn anything. All he does is copy and paste bullcrap from dishonest brain-dead anti-science websites.
Notice he did not provide a link because everyone knows Answers in Genesis claims the entire universe was magically created 6,000 years ago. I'm not making this up. They really are totally insane.
Nice try little boy. 
Next time little boy provide a link so I don't have waste 5 seconds of my time to look it up.
Maybe someday you will grow up, educate yourself, and face facts, but I doubt it.
-----------
"the only part from answers in genesis was:"
As if that makes it OK. Answers in Genesis thinks the entire universe was magically created 6,000 years ago. In other words these people are insane, and this where you go for science education. Do you see the problem?
"such estimates for H. habilis are highly suspect"
As if these insane science deniers are qualified to say anything about it.
A 6,000 year old universe. The scientific consensus has it at about 3,700,000,000 years old. Compare these 2 numbers. Your favorite idiots are 3.7 Billion years wrong.
There is absolutely no excuse for copying and pasting ridiculous dishonest bullcrap and then not provide a link. Did you think you could get away with it?
Science deniers deny science because they go out of their way to avoid real scientists. The idea is knowing nothing is a good thing.
These people are cowards. Scientists make them cry because they threaten the magical fantasies that make these feeble-minded people feel good.

What I wrote for the religious retards who infest the Wall Street Journal.

Did God Die in 1859?
Yes and thank goodness. We don't need the violence, the brainwashing, the stupidity, the insanity, and the war against science.
Look at the newspaper. Virtually all the violence has something to with religious stupidity. Enough is enough.
The ridiculous god fantasy was thrown out in 1859. Unfortunately not everyone got the memo. The other problem is cowards can't live without their magical 2nd life, a ridiculous childish fantasy American Christians share with the Islamic State terrorists.
Typical theist:
"Duh, I don't understand science therefore the Magic Man did it."
Every moronic religious fantasy is the wishful thinking of cowards. The cowards need to grow up, educate themselves, and face facts.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/did-god-die-in-1859-1484951708

Saturday, January 21, 2017

"Religion is outdated, harmful to the individual, harmful to society, an impediment to the progress of science, a source of immoral acts or customs, and a political tool for social control."

"Critics of religion in general often regard religion as outdated, harmful to the individual, harmful to society, an impediment to the progress of science, a source of immoral acts or customs, and a political tool for social control."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_religion

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Translation of what I wrote at chess.com: Chess.com is crap. Their stuff is inferior and they expect you to pay for it. Lichess.org is better and it's totally free.

"I have become a better player over the past few years, but I still shy away from Sicilians due to the massive amount of theory and preparation required."
It's not necessary to memorize lots of stuff for this fantastic opening (especially the Najdorf Variation) for Black. Just understand the basics by studying how Fischer played it. Then just use it. When you get wiped out you have something to work with. Get a free and complete computer analysis of your game and find out what you did wrong. Never throw out the Najdorf Variation no matter how many times you are defeated. This advice was given to me a long time ago and I'm grateful for it.
I noticed that if use the Najdorf and I survive the opening and middle game, I usually have an advantage in the endgame. So it's important to study the endgame first, both strategy and how to do things.
Where can you get a fantastic and totally free computer analysis of your games? I can't answer that question because Big Brother is watching. My answer would be vaporized and I would never again be allowed to write comments here.
I suggest just pay for what this place offers. Chess.com has been improving everything so it's OK to help them pay their bills. I'm not writing this because Big Brother is watching. Chess.com really is getting better and that costs money.

A Christian fucktard at a chess website wrote for someone else: "Your statement - " but later this was confirmed in dramatic fashion by the discovery of a quite arbitrary genetic code that is almost identical across all living organisms." could just as easily be because a creator uses similar code because it's the most efficient way to create something." This is what I wrote for the uneducated moron.

"could just as easily be because a creator uses similar code because it's the most efficient way to create something."
Translation: The Magic Man did it.
Your idea, besides being ridiculous, doesn't work for ERVs. Look it up.
Oh wait. You can't look it up because education makes you science deniers cry.
The most accurate explanation would be a copy and paste job from a real biologist. Of course you won't read it or if you did read it you wouldn't be able to understand it. Here it is anyway:
"We also harbor dead genes that came from other species, namely viruses. Some, called 'endogenous retroviruses' (ERVs), can make copies of their genome and insert them into the DNA of species they infect. (HIV is a retrovirus.) If the viruses infect the cells that make sperm and eggs, they can be passed on to future generations. The human genome contains thousands of such viruses, nearly all of them rendered harmless by mutations. They are the remnants of ancient infections. But some of these remnants sit in exactly the same location on the chromosomes of humans and chimpanzees. These were surely viruses that infected our common ancestor and were passed on to both descendants. Since there is almost no chance of viruses inserting themselves independently at exactly the same spot in two species, this points strongly to common ancestry."
-- Jerry Coyne, University of Chicago biologist
My point is those ERVs we have in common with chimpanzees can't be explained by the childish "The Magic Man did it" fantasy because there is no reason a fairy with a magic wand would magically insert ERVs in the exact same locations of two species. The only possible explanation is those ERVs were inherited from the common ancestor of human apes and chimpanzee apes.
Any child could understand this. Unfortunately the science deniers will never be able to understand. Their disease can't be fixed.
Professional idiots have tried to lie about this evidence. Not easy to lie about this one so what they do is try to change the subject. They say "the ERVs are functional therefore the evidence is wrong." It doesn't matter if that's true or not. That's not the point of this evidence. What matters is the ERVs were inherited from a common ancestor. These ERVs (about 16 of them unless more have been discovered) were not there when the creature evolved (or according to the science deniers when they were magically created) therefore the magic fairy had nothing to do with it.
I could use puppets to help science deniers understand but even that wouldn't work.
One more thing: There is a YouTube video that explains the whole thing in extreme detail. Here's the video and a quote from that video. Recommended for normal people. The science deniers would not be able to understand.
"WHAT IF INSERTION IS NOT RANDOM"
"If you run the numbers with the assumption that ERVs can only insert in 1% of the genome, i.e. highly nonrandom, you still get enormously low probabilities with only 16 ERVs. So even if insertion is highly nonrandom, getting the thousands of matched ERVs between all primates is unbelievably unlikely just like I show in the video (don't believe me, do the math)."
"Endogenous Retroviruses (ERVs) are the relics of ancient viral infections preserved in our DNA. The odd thing is many ERVs are located in exactly the same position on our genome and the chimpanzee genome. There are two explanations for the perfectly matched ERV locations. Either it is an unbelievable coincidence that viruses just by chance inserted in exactly the same location in our genomes, or humans and chimps share a common ancestor. It was our common ancestor that was infected, and we both inherited the ERVs. ERVs provide the closest thing to a mathematical proof for evolution. And remember, ERVs are just one of the millions of FACTS that support the theory of evolution. Think about it."

Sunday, January 15, 2017

The chess openings I use.

I use only these 3 openings:
If I have White I always use the King's Indian Attack.
If I have Black and my opponent's 1st move is anything except e4 I use the King's Indian Defense.
If I have Black and my opponent's 1st move is e4 I use the Sicilian Defense, preferably the Najdorf Variation.