Showing posts with label science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label science. Show all posts

Friday, June 25, 2021

The human apes living today are just one of many human species. We are the only humans who didn't go extinct.

        New York Times

BREAKING NEWS

A fossilized skull found in China could be a new species of ancient human, a team of scientists said. One expert called it “a beautiful thing.”

Friday, June 25, 2021 11:17 AM EST

Scientists on Friday announced that a massive fossilized skull that is at least 140,000 years old may be a new species of ancient human. It belonged to a mature male who had a huge brain, massive brow ridges, deep set eyes and a bulbous nose.

The skull had remained hidden in an abandoned well for 85 years, after a laborer came across it at a construction site in China.

Read the latest

Thursday, June 24, 2021

The Milky Way

The Westerlund 2 star cluster lies in the RCW 49 galactic nebula (shown here), which is one of the brightest star-forming regions in the Milky Way.

Boiling 'baby bubble' where stars are born comes into view

Tuesday, June 22, 2021

A very interesting story. I'm putting 2 links here for myself.

As a teenager in 1971, Koepcke was the sole survivor of the LANSA Flight 508 plane crash, then survived ten days alone in the Amazon rainforest. She survived a fall of 3,000 meters (9,843 feet), still strapped to her seat.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/18/science/koepcke-diller-panguana-amazon-crash.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juliane_Koepcke

Image

Nymphalid butterfly, Agrias sardanapalus.
Credit...Juliane Diller
Band-tailed manakin, Pipra fascicauda.
Credit...Konrad Wothe
Amazonian horned frog, Ceratophrys cornuta.
Amazonian horned frog, Ceratophrys cornuta. Robert Retzko
Black-capped squirrel monkeys, Saimiri boliviensis.
Credit...Robert Retzko

Monday, June 14, 2021

Darwin's Origin of Species: Books That Changed the World by Janet Browne | Feb 18, 2008

I have been reading a book about Charles Darwin, "Darwin's Origin of Species" by Janet Browne. I recommend it.

Darwin's most brilliant idea, natural selection, was strong evidence for the idea that the Magic Man didn't do it. This was the god fairy's most important job, the magical creation of species. Darwin proved the fairy had nothing to do with it. It was a natural process, no magic required.

To fix the problem religious fucktards had to throw out the science or stick the Magic Jeebus Man into the science. They can't do that, but they did it anyway because reality makes them cry.

Charles Darwin killed the ridiculous Magic Man.

Why do billions of people still think the magic fairy is real? That's easy, it's because they're uneducated morons.

This vaccine can be in any refrigerator. It works perfectly. Click the "Read more" link to see the excellent video.

The Washington Post
Alert
 

News Alert

June 14, 6:02 a.m. EDT

 

Novavax’s coronavirus vaccine is 90 percent effective, the company says, and also seems to work against variants it encountered

There were no cases of moderate or serious illness or hospitalization among people who received the two-dose regimen during a study conducted by the Gaithersburg, Md., biotechnology company, and few cases of even mild illness. The vaccine could become available in the summer if regulators clear it for emergency use.

Read more

Thursday, June 3, 2021

Was the Covid pandemic caused by a leak from a lab in Wuhan, China? I think there is a very good chance this is what happened, and the the Chinese government, which is a fucktard dictatorship, is covering up the evidence. "Chinese officials continue to block the world’s ability to get answers about the coronavirus’s origin as the subject remains murky and politically volatile."

New York Times

OPINION

BRET STEPHENS

Media Groupthink and the Lab-Leak Theory

May 31, 2021

By Bret Stephens
Opinion Columnist

If it turns out that the Covid pandemic was caused by a leak from a lab in Wuhan, China, it will rank among the greatest scientific scandals in history: dangerous research, possibly involving ethically dubious techniques that make viruses more dangerous, carried out in a poorly safeguarded facility, thuggishly covered up by a regime more interested in propaganda than human life, catastrophic for the entire world.

But this possible scandal, which is as yet unproved, obscures an actual scandal, which remains to be digested.

I mean the long refusal by too many media gatekeepers (social as well as mainstream) to take the lab-leak theory seriously. The reasons for this — rank partisanship and credulous reporting — and the methods by which it was enforced — censorship and vilification — are reminders that sometimes the most destructive enemies of science can be those who claim to speak in its name.

Rewind the tape to February of last year, when people such as Senator Tom Cotton began pointing to a disturbing fact set: the odd coincidence of a pandemic originating in the same city where a Chinese lab was conducting high-end experiments on bat viruses; the troubling report that some of the original Covid patients had no contact with the food markets where the pandemic supposedly originated; the fact that the Chinese government lied and stonewalled its way through the crisis. Think what you will about the Arkansas Republican, but these were reasonable observations warranting impartial investigation.

The common reaction in elite liberal circles? A Washington Post reporter called it a “fringe theory” that “has been repeatedly disputed by experts.” The Atlantic Council accused Cotton of abetting an “infodemic” by “pushing debunked claim that the novel coronavirus may have been created in a Wuhan lab.” A writer for Vox said it was a “dangerous conspiracy theory” being advanced by conservatives “known to regularly spew nonsense (and bash China).

There are many more such examples. But the overall shape of the media narrative was clear. On one side were experts at places like the World Health Organization: knowledgeable, incorruptible, authoritative, noble. On the other were a bunch of right-wing yahoos pushing a risible fantasy with xenophobic overtones in order to deflect attention from the Trump administration’s mishandling of the crisis.

Yet it was also a narrative with holes larger than Donald Trump’s mouth.

Was it outrageous to think that the virus might have escaped the Wuhan Institute? Not if you listened to evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein’s patient, lucid, scientifically rich explanation of the lab-leak hypothesis — which he delivered almost a year ago on the decidedly non-mainstream Joe Rogan podcast.

Was it smart for science reporters to accept the authority of a February 2020 letter, signed by 27 scientists and published in The Lancet, feverishly insisting on the “natural origin” of Covid? Not if those reporters had probed the ties between the letter’s lead author and the Wuhan lab (a fact, as the science writer Nicholas Wade points out in a landmark essay in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, that has been public knowledge for months).

Was it wise to suppose that the World Health Organization, which has served as a mouthpiece for Chinese regime propaganda, should be an authority on what counted as Covid “misinformation” by Facebook, which in February banned the lab-leak theory from its platform? Not if the aim of companies like Facebook is to bring the world closer together, as opposed to laundering Chinese government disinformation while modeling its illiberal methods.

To its credit, Facebook reversed itself last week. News organizations are quietly correcting (or stealth editing) last year’s dismissive reports, sometimes using the fig leaf of new information about Wuhan lab workers being infected in the fall of 2019 with a Covid-like illness. And the public-health community is taking a fresh look at its Covid origin story.

But even now one gets a distinct sense of the herd of independent minds hard at work. If the lab-leak theory is finally getting the respectful attention it always deserved, it’s mainly because Joe Biden authorized an inquiry and Anthony Fauci admitted to doubts about the natural-origin claim. In other words, the right president and the right public-health expert have blessed a certain line of inquiry.

Yet the lab-leak theory, whether or not it turns out to be right, was always credible. Even if Tom Cotton believed it. Even if the scientific “consensus” disputed it. Even if bigots — who rarely need a pretext — drew bigoted conclusions from it.

Good journalism, like good science, should follow evidence, not narratives. It should pay as much heed to intelligent gadflies as it does to eminent authorities. And it should never treat honest disagreement as moral heresy.

Anyone wondering why so many people have become so hostile to the pronouncements of public-health officials and science journalists should draw the appropriate conclusion from this story. When lecturing the public about the dangers of misinformation, it’s best not to peddle it yourself.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Bret L. Stephens has been an Opinion columnist with The Times since April 2017. He won a Pulitzer Prize for commentary at The Wall Street Journal in 2013 and was previously editor in chief of The Jerusalem Post. Facebook

A version of this article appears in print on June 1, 2021, Section A, Page 23 of the New York edition with the headline: The Lab-Leak Theory and The Media.

Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Monday, May 24, 2021

I wrote this for the god-soaked morons at the Wall Street Journal.

"If you look at the universe and study the universe, what you find is that there is no evidence that we need anything other than the laws of physics and the other laws of science to explain everything we see. There's absolutely no evidence that we need any supernatural hand of God."

-- Lawrence Krauss

I wrote this for some god-soaked cry babies at the Wall Street Journal but what I wrote was not published. Christian assholes hide behind censorship. The stupid, it burns.

"The existence of the universe"

Your god thing didn't magically create the universe. We have something called "science". Look it up.

By the way, what created your imaginary god thing? The usual excuse is "God always existed". That's just being childish.

Your God is equal to Santa Claus. It's for children and for people who never learned how to grow up.

Also, the child abuse thing. It's brainwashing and it's disgusting.

Wednesday, May 19, 2021

President Biden continues to fix what Fucktard Trump destroyed. Trump is a stupid fucking asshole.

New York Times

Biden reappoints a top climate scientist who was removed by Trump.

By Christopher Flavelle

May 19, 2021

The Biden administration has reappointed the scientist responsible for the National Climate Assessment, the federal government’s premier contribution to climate knowledge, after he was removed from his post last year by President Donald J. Trump.

The removal of the scientist, Michael Kuperberg, was part of an effort in the final months of the Trump administration to thwart the climate assessment, which compiles the work of hundreds of scientists and helps shape regulations.

Dr. Kuperberg was replaced last November by David Legates, an academic who had previously worked closely with climate change denial groups. Just days before Mr. Trump left office, Dr. Legates posted a series of debunked scientific reports bearing the logo of the executive office of the president.

The Trump administration also removed the chief scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which helps coordinate the climate assessment. And it removed a third scientist involved in the previous version of the climate assessment after she resisted changes sought by the administration.

The reappointment of Dr. Kuperberg, whose title is executive director of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, follows the Biden administration’s creation this month of a Scientific Integrity Task Force, which White House officials have said will “review lapses of scientific integrity and ways to remedy them.”

In a statement, Dr. Kuperberg said he looked forward to helping his office “deliver nonpartisan, science-based results” to guide climate policy.

Wednesday, May 12, 2021

Human-caused global warming is not a good thing.

The Washington Post
Alert
 

News Alert

May 12, 4:23 p.m. EDT

 

Spike in urban heat waves and loss of Alaskan permafrost signal climate change is intensifying, EPA report finds

The report, which was delayed from being released to the public under the Trump administration, shows the country has entered unprecedented territory when it comes to global warming, according to federal scientists. The agency relaunched a website detailing these climate change indicators to convey to the public how these damages are becoming more severe.

Read more

Thursday, May 6, 2021

America is going back to the moon and then we will live on Mars. Elon Musk is not making this stuff up.

The Atlantic

SCIENCE

Elon Musk Is Maybe, Actually, Strangely, Going to Do This Mars Thing


From his private Cape Canaveral, the billionaire is manifesting his own interplanetary reality—whatever it costs.

Story by Marina Koren

The little havanese likes to sit in a window of the one-story house, looking out onto the quiet street in Boca Chica, Texas. From its perch, it can watch neighbors passing by, glossy black grackles pecking in the grass, and palm trees swaying in the breeze. The dog’s presence is usually a sign that its owner, Elon Musk, is in town. That, and the Tesla parked in the driveway.

There are other, more conspicuous signs that Musk has gotten comfortable in this remote part of South Texas, near the U.S.-Mexico border. The hulking manufacturing tents just down the road. The steel strewn on the ground. The mechanical hum of machinery as workers in hard hats assemble spaceship after spaceship.

Musk has built a shipyard here. This is the staging area for SpaceX’s founding dream, the reason Musk got into the rocket business: to put human beings on Mars, not to drop a flag and go home, but to stay and survive. That Mars might be a terrible place to live is irrelevant. Musk believes that humankind should exist on more than one planet, and that we should start soon.

Musk intends to make a leap in that direction with Starship, a reusable spaceship-and-rocket system that he hopes will redefine travel—first by jetting from continent to continent, then from Earth to the moon, and finally from Earth to Mars. At a glance, this plan sounds like the kind of idealistic dream you’d expect from a wealthy entrepreneur who is often compared, without irony, to a comic-book hero. Or maybe, depending on your view of Musk, a self-aggrandizing fantasy from one of the most trollish, publicly chaotic figures of our time. But the fantasy is swiftly crystallizing into a feasible reality. The South Texas shipyard is churning at all hours. A Starship prototype finally stuck its landing last night (without bursting into flames minutes later). And the world’s top space agency believes in the effort too.

NASA has given SpaceX a $2.9 billion contract to develop a version of Starship to land American astronauts on the surface of the moon for the first time since the Apollo program. Jeff Bezos’s rocket company, Blue Origin, which partnered with a few longtime NASA contractors to bid on the same job, has formally challenged NASA over its decision to choose a single contractor. The agency has put the contract on hold for the time being, but it appears that the next visitors to the moon—including, NASA has promised, the first woman and person of color—could be flying SpaceX.

America has now tied one of its biggest space dreams to SpaceX, which means the country has tied it to Elon Musk, the company’s CEO and chief engineer. To build Starship, the billionaire has overhauled Boca Chica into his private Cape Canaveral, and has started referring to the area as “Starbase.” He has mocked Bezos and other competitors; he has chafed at federal oversight. He has also made Boca Chica the one place on Earth where the dream of getting to Mars feels most real. The Starship work that SpaceX is doing now, if it pans out, will be the company’s most impressive achievement. More impressive than landing rocket boosters upright on a ship in the ocean. More impressive than enveloping the planet in a bubble of hundreds of internet satellites. More impressive than launching astronauts to the International Space Station, and bringing them home safely.

Musk now says that Starship could land people on the moon in 2024, and take them to Mars within the decade. He is famous for his aspirational, and usually unrealistic, timelines. But the Starship project could bring humankind closer than it has been in 50 years to reaching another world again. If the idea of SpaceX sending people to the moon, let alone Mars, seemed like an abstraction a decade ago, then a decade from now, it might seem like a given.

Twenty years ago, if people were familiar with Elon Musk, they knew him as the nerdy powerhouse behind a couple of internet companies—Zip2, a software company that was eventually folded into the AltaVista search engine, and X.com, an online bank that eventually merged with PayPal. In 2002, after the entrepreneur from South Africa had sold off one business and left the other, a friend asked what he wanted to do next. Space exploration, Musk said—he’d always been interested in that. Born in 1971, the year of the third moon landing, Musk assumed that NASA had a plan to reach Mars, and soon. When he went searching for a schedule on NASA’s website, he told Wired in 2012, he found that the agency had no plans, nor a big enough budget for an Apollo-style rush to reach the red planet. “At first I thought, jeez, maybe I’m just looking in the wrong place! Why was there no plan, no schedule?” Musk said in the interview. “There was nothing.”

There had been a moment, after the moon landings, when the rest of the solar system had suddenly felt within reach, Mars especially. Even some of the Apollo astronauts had thought so, and had held out hope for a Mars mission. Instead, they became the last people to travel beyond low-Earth orbit. In the decades that followed, a wonderful assortment of space probes ventured into the solar system, to Mars and Saturn and Pluto, but human beings remained close to home, flying shuttles and building space stations.

Musk decided that he would rally some support for a Mars shot; perhaps a small greenhouse on the red planet’s surface—a beautiful juxtaposition of terrestrial life and an alien world—would capture the public’s attention. But when he looked into rocket launches, he was surprised by their steep price tags. Surely someone had figured out how to make space travel cheaper by now?

Read: The world’s richest men are brawling over the moon

Within a decade, SpaceX successfully launched a rocket into orbit, in 2008. By 2016, it had landed a 14-story rocket booster back on Earth in one piece—on the ground, and on a ship at sea—a triumph in an industry used to discarding expensive rocket bits in the ocean. SpaceX had sacrificed about a dozen boosters in this quest; there were big explosions, small explosions, mid-air explosions, made-it-to-the-barge-but-then-the-landing-legs-crumpled explosions. (The company eventually compiled the attempts all into a blooper reel.) A couple of Falcon 9 rockets carrying expensive payloads also exploded, but those failures feel distant now, and these days, the company’s mood is buoyant. To longtime SpaceX workers, the manic Muskian approach always pays off. “It went from, Holy crap, how are we going to do this? to what I would consider a quiet professional confidence,” a former SpaceX employee who worked on the company’s human-spaceflight efforts, and who requested anonymity in order to maintain future business ties with the company, told me. The Starship team’s confidence, the former employee said, is likely “sky high.”

Today, SpaceX regularly flies astronauts into orbit on a transportation system it designed from start to finish, and is the only private company to have earned that responsibility. But the Dragon capsule doing that work is a cozy, gumdrop-shaped container, not a giant spaceship, and can carry seven people at a time, not the 100 passengers Musk imagines boarding Starship someday. If successful, Starship would be unlike any other space vehicle in history, especially on its return to Earth. America’s now-retired fleet of space shuttles landed on runways like planes, Russian Soyuz capsules parachute down to the desert, and SpaceX’s Dragon capsules splash down in open water, but Musk envisions Starship landing vertically, as upright as it stood before liftoff. It is an enormous technical challenge.

Since December, workers at the Boca Chica shipyard have constructed several Starship prototypes—stocky, 150-foot-tall towers of stainless steel with fins—hauled them to a launchpad on a nearby beach on the Gulf of Mexico, and watched them launch. None of them survived until last night—the fifth attempt—when the prototype nailed the intricate maneuver it was designed to do: The spacecraft rose more than 30,000 feet into the sky, quieting its engines as it went, then flipped onto its belly and fell down, down, down, before firing up again and righting itself for a gentle landing, like a falling cat twisting around at the last minute to find its feet.

The string of fiery flights might have made it seem as if SpaceX was struggling, or unsure. But the opposite is true. SpaceX engineers jokingly call explosions RUDs, for “rapid unscheduled disassembly,” and the names of Starship prototypes start with SN, for “serial number,” a signifier that the product is not precious, but a good production line is. When one prototype is destroyed, another promptly takes its place. In the company’s early years, all those explosions might have given it pause, but now barely any SpaceX doubters are left in the industry.

Read: Why SpaceX wants a tiny Texas neighborhood so badly

Musk moved from California, where SpaceX is headquartered, to Texas last year. He appears in Boca Chica often, along with his children and his dog. SpaceX did not respond to requests for comment on this story, and hasn’t replied to other inquiries from The Atlantic in more than a year. The company has had little imperative to be forthcoming about Starship development, and it doesn’t have the same obligations to the public or the press as NASA does. Musk has also been impatient with the Federal Aviation Administration, which handles licenses for space launches and dispatches safety inspectors to Boca Chica, and has accused the agency of slowing SpaceX down. The new moon contract—a high-profile, taxpayer-funded assignment—might force a shade more transparency. SpaceX does broadcast Boca Chica’s test launches, but the best views of Starship work come from a small community that has formed to monitor the company’s efforts. Most days, anyone can drive past the secluded Starship site and take pictures, though security guards might ask you to move along if you get too close.

One of the most well-known chroniclers, Mary McConnaughey, who goes by BocaChicaGal online, has been following SpaceX’s operations since the company arrived in 2014. She lives within sight of the house where the Havanese likes to perch. McConnaughey and her neighbors in Boca Chica Village never imagined that someone might try to build a spaceship in their little coastal paradise. When I visited the village in the fall of 2019, SpaceX was trying to buy the residents’ homes. Some residents sold and left, but others remained, refusing the price SpaceX had offered them. Although Musk once indicated that SpaceX’s job would be easier if they would leave, the company appears to have stopped pursuing their properties for now. On test days, the residents are used to receiving warning notices and going somewhere else. One resident, Celia Garcia-Johnson, who wanted to avoid traveling far from home during the coronavirus pandemic, spends launch days with her dog in an Airstream parked a few miles from the village, courtesy of SpaceX.

The village is now an expanding space town. There are more Airstreams, for spaceship workers who stay overnight, and a restaurant called Prancing Pony. (In J. R. R. Tolkien’s Middle-earth, an inn of the same name provisioned travelers before they embarked on a long journey.) Boca Chica “will grow by several thousand people over the next year or two,” Musk said in March, filling up with engineers, technicians, and support personnel “of all kinds.” In April, SpaceX threw a block party in the village, with a live band, and invited everyone, employees and remaining homeowners alike. Garcia-Johnson told me she enjoyed socializing with the SpaceX employees, some of whom live in the village themselves. But she can’t shake her uneasy feelings about the future of Boca Chica. Garcia-Johnson has owned her home here for nearly 30 years. “Scripture says ‘love thy neighbor,’ and if SpaceX is my neighbor, I guess I have to love SpaceX,” she told me.

If Boca Chica becomes a 21st-century spaceport, the last stop on Earth before Mars, it is difficult to imagine SpaceX tolerating straggling residents. Musk recently said that he would donate $20 million to schools in Cameron County, where Boca Chica is located, and $10 million to Brownsville, the nearest city, for “downtown revitalization.” Some of the homeowners here have feared that county officials, who are thrilled about SpaceX’s presence, could take over their properties through eminent domain. Using that power to make way for a private spaceport—rather than, say, a highway or a stadium—would be unusual, but not a surprise. SpaceX has launched hundreds of little satellites into Earth’s orbit without much input from the rest of Earth’s inhabitants. Musk has rarely faced resistance in his attempts to shape the world around him, and this world could be just the beginning.

The first city on mars, according to musk, will be made of pressurized glass domes. No breathable air on the red planet, after all. After that, Musk has said, we’ll terraform Mars to make the planet resemble Earth. Musk is, obviously, mostly focused on the getting-there part, and his living-there plan sometimes seems almost cavalier. In a 2019 interview with Popular Mechanics, he called life on Mars “quite manageable.” “But the planning that will have gone into knowing what you’re going to do when you get there—for food, for water, for fuel,” the journalist interviewing him said, apparently giving Musk some room to address potential challenges. “Once you get there,” Musk replied, “that stuff is relatively straightforward.” Other times, he is more direct about the scale of the effort and the risks it entails. “It’s an arduous and dangerous journey where you may not come back alive, but it’s a glorious adventure,” Musk said at a recent speaking event.

Musk can get away with talking like this not just because he is the second-richest person in the world, but because he has made himself into a figure who can make outlandish plans sound plausible—who has already made outlandish plans possible. He can talk forever about the importance of turning humankind into a multiplanetary species, of bringing Earth’s plants and wildlife with us to Mars if or when some doomsday event wipes us out on this planet. The people who run NASA can’t inspire us—or scare us—like that. They certainly want to build a base on the moon, and someday plant an American flag on Mars. But they can invoke only the usual ideas, of American exceptionalism and spirit, that have underpinned the country’s space effort since its beginnings, and hold up the wonder of space travel as proof that “we can meet any challenge” on Earth, as President Joe Biden said recently. NASA can’t replicate Musk’s attitude to hardware, either. “We’re definitely going to build a lot of rockets, and probably smash a lot of them,” Musk said in a recent press conference.

And yet, the brash billionaire and the storied space agency have now linked their futures to each other. The first moon missions of the 21st century are bound to be repeats of the Apollo landings, only with much better footage from the surface. With SpaceX, Musk has brought the country back to the intoxicating moment that followed Neil Armstrong’s small step, when the air seemed to buzz with the possibility of more steps on other alien surfaces. This is the same Elon Musk who launched a Tesla into space, tweets about putting Dogecoin on the moon, and shares NSFW memes; whose posts have led to lawsuits on more than one occasion; and who is hosting Saturday Night Live this weekend, alongside the musical guest Miley Cyrus. At this point, Iron Man taking NASA astronauts to the moon would sound more believable. Until you remember that Musk really has made it this far.

Read: America’s new vision of astronauts

“NASA still does fantastic work, but when it comes to really changing the space sector as a whole, SpaceX is the one that people think of the most,” Laura Forczyk, a space analyst and the author of Rise of the Space Age Millennials, told me. Her book’s Millennial subjects pointed to SpaceX’s achievements as their source of inspiration, and she’s working on a new edition featuring interviews with members of the younger Generation Z, who say the same.

A triumphant return to the moon, or a historic voyage to Mars, is bound to captivate the public as the Apollo landings did. But it will not inspire America, or the world, in some magical, universal way. The majority of Americans believed that the Apollo program wasn’t worth the effort throughout the 1960s, with the exception of the awestruck reaction to Armstrong’s first moonwalk. Today, most Americans don’t believe going back to the moon should be a priority, and they’re not all that jazzed about astronauts setting off for Mars, either. The government can still push for the moon, regardless of public opinion, but unlike a private company like SpaceX, NASA at least has to explain where all that money is going and why. Meanwhile, a growing industry of private space tourism, with vehicles capable of flying more autonomously than ever before, is changing the profile of astronauts, and soon, perhaps, most people who go to space will not be highly trained pilots or scientists, but simply rich people. Already, a Japanese entrepreneur has purchased an entire Starship flight for as many as 12 passengers for a loop around the moon in 2024.

This future depends on Starship leaving the planet at all. The project still has a long way to go—more prototypes, more hours of tests and troubleshooting, a separate effort to engineer the behemoth rocket booster that will loft the spaceship into orbit and then return to Earth in the delicate sequence that SpaceX has nearly perfected with its other boosters. The South Texas shipyard will continue its sprawl along the coast, like a fast-growing invasive species. When Garcia-Johnson returned home after an explosive test in late March, she discovered a sign of the changing habitat—one of her windows had shattered from the force of the blast. SpaceX summoned a window company to repair it the next day, down the two-lane state highway that SpaceX fans call “the highway to Mars,” the only way into Boca Chica. Take this path all the way to Boca Chica, past the solar-panel farms and storage sheds, past the little street that used to be called Joanna Street until Musk renamed it Rocket Road, and you end up on the beach, with sky and sea stretching out before you. It’s a beautiful view on any day, and maybe, one day, it’ll be someone’s last look at Earth.

MARINA KOREN is a staff writer at The Atlantic. Twitter

78,000 years ago: "A child, aged between two and three years old, was carefully laid to rest in a cave which today is known as Panga ya Saidi, on the Kenyan coast."

                  An artist’s impression of the child, nicknamed “Mtoto”, meaning “child” in Swahili.CREDIT:


                  Mtoto’s remains as they appeared to researchers once the site was excavated.CREDIT:


                                                The Panga ya Saidi cave site in Kenya.CREDIT:

How giant snails helped confirm the oldest human burial in Africa

By Stuart Layt

May 6, 2021

Researchers have confirmed the oldest human burial site discovered in Africa, piecing the find together through painstaking work involving meticulous archaeological methods, intricate computer modeling, and the shells of giant snails.

A child, aged between two and three years old, was carefully laid to rest in a cave which today is known as Panga ya Saidi, on the Kenyan coast.

About 78,000 years later, the remains were discovered by archaeologists working in the area, but they did not know what they had found right away.

Professor Nicole Boivin, the principal investigator with the original project which discovered the bones in 2013, said they knew they had found something significant, but the site itself was extremely degraded and needed to be put in plaster almost completely to remove it and take it to the lab to study.

Professor Boivin, head of the archaeology department at the Max Planck Institute, said colleagues managed to piece together the remains and get a clear picture of the child and the age of the site.

“The team at the National Research Centre on Human Evolution (CENIEH) did extraordinary work,” Professor Boivin said.

“Maria [Martinon-Torres, CENIEH director] took a lump of crushed, powdery bone and sediment, and did such meticulous and amazing science that she was able to reconstruct how the skeleton had been positioned, the fact that it must have been wrapped before burial, the fact that the head was placed on some kind of cushion.”

After years of working on the project, Professor Martinon-Torres nicknamed the child Mtoto, which means child in Swahili.

Part of the analysis of the site involved looking at items found around the remains, including stone tools and fragments of shells.

University of Sydney archaeologist Patrick Faulkner specializes in the shells of snails and mollusks, and he determined the ones found with the child were most likely from African land snails, which still exist and are eaten by people in the region.

“We looked at things like breakage and whether the shells were burned to find out what had happened to them and why they were in that area,” he said.

“In the end it was hard to tell, the amount of material recovered from the burial site was quite small, but it appears the shells were incorporated into the burial.

“We can’t say too much more about whether they were included ceremonially, although some of the shells had cut marks on them which were made deliberately, they were modified and placed in that site by humans.”

Evidence of human burial extends back over 120,000 years, with the oldest sites discovered in Europe and the Levant.

Neanderthals and Homo sapiens buried their dead, however there has been much debate about who did so first, and whether practices extended between the two human species.

Before this site, the oldest burial site in Africa was 74,000 years old, in South Africa, while a grave site in Egypt has been dated to 68,000 years ago.

“With the newest find from Panga ya Saidi, we have a pattern emerging in which the earliest burials we have in Africa are all of younger members of human societies,” Professor Boivin said.

“It may mean that in several regions of eastern and southern Africa, early Homo sapiens groups were giving children special burial treatment, and that the bodies of adults were interred or treated in a different way.”

But she stressed that the relatively small number of sites so far discovered meant scientists had to be cautious in making sweeping statements.

“The research being done in Africa is extensive but patchy. There’s been concentrations in southern Africa, northern Africa and parts of the west, but east Africa, in terms of picking up sites of this antiquity, just hasn’t been there until recently,” Dr Faulkner said.

“This site won’t sit in isolation, there has to be more evidence out there that relates to this period or even earlier, we just need to look for them.”

The findings have been published in the journal Nature.

Stuart Layt
Twitter

Stuart Layt covers health, science and technology for the Brisbane Times. He was formerly the Queensland political reporter for AAP.

Tuesday, May 4, 2021

You would have to click the link to see this: "A full rotation of the asteroid Vesta, as seen from the Dawn spacecraft in 2011." The thing blew up over Botswana, Africa. 24 meteorites were found by very happy scientists.

A fragment of the asteroid 2018 LA, found in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve in Botswana in 2018.
A fragment of the asteroid 2018 LA, found in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve in Botswana in 2018.

New York Times

A 22-Million-Year Journey From the Asteroid Belt to Botswana

Astronomers reconstructed a space rock’s path before it exploded over southern Africa in 2018 and sprinkled the Kalahari with meteorites.

By Robin George Andrews

April 29, 2021

On the morning of June 2, 2018, an asteroid was seen careening toward us at 38,000 miles per hour. It was going to impact Earth, and there was nothing anyone could do to stop it. Astronomers were beside themselves with excitement.

Five feet long and weighing about the same as an adult African elephant, this space rock posed no threat. But the early detection of this asteroid, only the second to be spotted in space before hitting land, was a good test of our ability to spot larger, more dangerous asteroids. Moreover, it afforded scientists the chance to study the asteroid before its obliteration, quickly narrow down the impact site and obtain some of the most pristine, least weathered meteorite samples around.

Later that day, a fireball almost as bright as the sun illuminated Botswana’s darkened sky before exploding 17 miles above ground with the force of 200 tons of TNT. Fragments fell like extraterrestrial buckshot into a national park larger than the Netherlands.

Immediately, Botswanan scientists and guides joined with international meteorite experts to hunt for the asteroid’s wreckage. As of November 2020, the team has found 24 individual meteorites. And thanks to the telltale geology of these rocky leftovers, observations of their path to Earth and the memories of a dead NASA spacecraft, scientists were able to unspool the history of this asteroid with breathtaking detail.

As reported earlier this month in the journal Meteoritics & Planetary Science, Botswana’s off-world visitor was once part of Vesta, a gigantic ramshackle asteroid forged at the dawn of the solar system. About 22 million years ago, another asteroid crashed into one of its lonely hills, leaving a modest crater and sending countless shards of Vesta on a space odyssey. One of them was the object that fell over southern Africa in 2018, an explosive end to a lonely journey.

“It is such an amazing thing to be in possession of such a rare specimen with so much history attached to it,” said Mohutsiwa Gabadirwe, a geologist and curator at the Botswana Geoscience Institute who is a co-author.

Named 2018 LA, the asteroid was first seen by the Catalina Sky Survey, a trio of telescopes north of Tucson, Ariz. Additional telescopes, like the SkyMapper Southern Sky Survey, saw it too, allowing scientists to tentatively map out an impact site in southern Africa.

Peter Jenniskens, a meteorite expert at the SETI Institute and study author, said that the initial search area was a 1,400-square-mile patch in Botswana. Hoping to shrink it down, he visited local businesses with Oliver Moses of the Okavango Research Institute. They located security camera footage at a hotel and gas stations that had recorded the fireball, allowing them to more precisely pinpoint the fall site: a (still-sizable) spot within the Central Kalahari Game Reserve.

This was a surreal place to go meteorite hunting. Bat-eared foxes and warthogs strolled past, lions stealthily stalked and slaughtered giraffes while leopards lounged in trees. Wardens from Botswana’s Department of Wildlife and National Parks protected the search party in case a fanged predator got too close for comfort. The meteorites also looked a lot like animal poop, meaning the team were frequently bamboozled by coprological impostors.

“It was a totally unusual experience for all of us,” said Mr. Gabadirwe.

Only on June 23, the last day of the initial search mission, was the first meteorite found — a small piece of the stars weighing less than an ounce. It was named Motopi Pan, after a local watering hole. “It became a national treasure of Botswana, this little rock,” Dr. Jenniskens said.

The meteorites’ compositions were matched to those found on Vesta, with the help of data from NASA’s Dawn spacecraft. Now lifelessly orbiting the dwarf planet Ceres after running out of fuel in late 2018, Dawn documented the geology of Vesta from 2011 to 2012. Scientists corroborated this origin story by reverse engineering the asteroid’s Earthbound trajectory.

Cosmic rays imprint traces on asteroids by altering atomic nuclei. The traces on these meteorites suggested the asteroid that crashed into Earth bathed in this radiation for 22 million years as it traveled to Earth. That meant an impact crater 22 million years old would mark the spot where this asteroid was liberated from Vesta.

A six-mile-long crater named Rubria on Vesta was the best candidate. The asteroid’s surprising lack of contamination by the solar wind — the stream of plasma and particles coming from the sun — suggested the asteroid’s material was shielded from space for billions of years. Unlike one other similarly aged crater, Rubria sat on a hill undisturbed by landslides, a tranquil place 2018 LA could remain buried before an impact set it free.

“The study has it all, in terms of cosmic drama,” said Katherine Joy, a meteorite expert at the University of Manchester in England not involved with the work. But linking 2018 LA to a specific place on Vesta relies on many underlying assumptions, so no one can be sure that Rubria is the correct spot.

For now, scientists will continue to monitor the skies and scout Earth’s deserts, hoping to find more enlightening fragments of our cosmic cradle’s past. Meteorite hunts “are always incredible adventures,” said Dr. Jenniskens — an exhausting but thrilling way to spend a lifetime.

A version of this article appears in print on April 30, 2021, Section A, Page 12 of the New York edition with the headline: Scientists Unspool Story of Asteroid’s Journey to Botswana.

Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

Friday, April 23, 2021

Some science stuff from the New York Times

NYTimes.com/Science

                  April 23, 2021


“We together flew at Mars, and we together now have this Wright brothers moment.” — MiMi Aung, the project manager for NASA’s Ingenuity copter on Mars, to her team celebrating the first powered flight on another world. (A second test flight on Thursday was also successful.)

“It is unusual for me to read a paper and say, ‘Wow, this is really a major advance.’ But this is a major advance.” — Valerie Horsley, a biologist at Yale, on a Stanford study showing that an existing drug can prevent scars from forming in mice.

Singularities seeking pluralitiesAstronomers are debating what to call a bunch of black holes. A crush? A sieve? A riddle? See what other readers are proposing, and add your own candidate.

By Alan Burdick

Henry David Thoreau was 44 when, in January 1860, two years before his death from tuberculosis, he encountered Charles Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species.”

The book did not change Thoreau’s life so much as complete it. For the last several years (“Walden” appeared in 1854) he had taken to meticulously documenting the flora of his native Concord, Mass. Seeds especially fascinated him: how they came to be where they were, and how variously suited they were to getting around. The flat, barbed germs of the bur marigold, he remarked in one of his hundreds of notebooks, “will often adhere to your clothes in surprising numbers” like the arrows “of some countless but invisible Lilliputian army.”

His observations were a quiet but pointed rebuke to prominent biologists at the time, who held that some plants were “spontaneously generated” — from no seed at all — and that species were immutable and geographically static. In the particulars, Thoreau, like Darwin, saw something else: seeds primed for wide dispersal, a nature dynamic and continuously revitalized. “We find ourselves in a world that is already planted, but is still being planted as at first,” he wrote.

Modern scientists — perhaps plant scientists above all — find themselves in similar terrain: Much is already known, but dig around a little and there’s more to discover. That’s what led researchers at the University of Michigan recently to dig up a bottle of seeds buried by another scientist 142 years ago, in what has become one of the longest-running experiments in history — the “28 Up” of carpology. The question at stake was simply stated but, it turned out, required decades to answer: How long can a seed remain dormant and still remain viable?

In effect, a seed is a form of memory. Each one carries a combination of genes from its parents — not an identical copy, but true enough to sprout into an organism capable of reproducing and continuing the cycle. A seed is a vessel across time, ideally generations and ages. (In an added twist, a seed inherits the details of its dormancy — the temperature at which it should wake — from its mother plant, but the counter resets with the next generation.)

So are humans, individually and collectively. A “self” is what we call an entity conscious of its own past and persistence: you are you, made up of your memories (you were you yesterday) and your expectations (you will be you tomorrow). A society is an assortment of selves that transcends the life span of any one individual and, ideally, is smart enough to build libraries and other forms of institutional memory.

The enemy, of course, is forgetting. So at each scale we toss our selves into the future, hoping something of us will stick like an arrow or a burr: an heirloom, an autobiography, a bottle of seeds buried in the Michigan soil, a rover on Mars called Perseverance. Who is up ahead there, waiting to receive our selves? Us, we hope — with our library cards, our shovels, our Mars-color glasses. But we’ll have to wait and see.