Cowardly Muslim assholes stone a woman to death after burying her up to her neck. Islamization Watch
American liberals get some things right. For example they are in favor of protecting the environment and endangered species, they are pro-science, they don't want our government to stick its nose into anyone's private life, and they respect the Establishment Clause of our Bill of Rights (also known as our wall of separation between church and state). Many American liberals are atheists.
I agree with them about all these things but I would never call myself a liberal because I consider that word to be an insult.
I'm an economic conservative so I have a good understanding about how capitalism works. Hint: Capitalism works best when the government gets out of the way.
American liberals, even though they live in a capitalist country, seem to hate capitalism. They sure don't know anything about it.
For example when a person works hard for several decades, lives frugally, saves lots of money, make wise investments in the stock market, and then after all that hard work becomes rich, liberals think that person should be punished with higher taxes. Liberals think it's a good idea to punish success. They call this "being fair" as if there's something fair about a government that steals money from hard working citizens.
Liberals love the words "politically correct". Like American Bible thumpers, liberals are not able to think for themselves, so if they're not sure which side to take about something they find out whether or not it's politically correct according to other liberals.
Liberals are easily excited. If anyone has the nerve to disagree with them about anything, they cry like babies then they go berserk. For example if liberals read the title of this post (Why do American liberals suck up to Muslim scum) their faces would turn red and they would be filled with rage because I used the word scum to describe Muslim scum. Even atheists liberals will do this.
I have seen cowardly liberals, who would never in a million years do anything to defend their country, criticize and insult brave soldiers because in a combat situation they make an error and kill innocent civilians. These soldiers will have nightmares about these mistakes for the rest of their lives. Meanwhile cowardly liberal assholes, while sitting in their comfortable safe American homes, insult these soldiers just because they made an innocent mistake. Liberals are world-class fucking assholes.
Why do both theist and atheist liberals suck up to Muslim scum? Let's forget about the theists. Why do atheist liberals suck up to Muslims? That's a good question because I think it's very strange.
Muslims have a lot of problems and their childish idiotic magic god fairy fantasy is only a small part of it.
There are Muslims who call themselves moderate but there's nothing moderate about being a fucking idiot. These "moderate" Muslims often give 10% of their income to Islamic organizations and guess where at least some of this money winds up. It supports terrorism which should be no surprise because Islam is the world's largest terrorist organization.
There are Muslims who call themselves moderate but there's nothing moderate about being a fucking idiot. These "moderate" Muslims often give 10% of their income to Islamic organizations and guess where at least some of this money winds up. It supports terrorism which should be no surprise because Islam is the world's largest terrorist organization.
If a Muslim wanted to grow up and become an atheist, preferably an atheist who agrees Muslims are fucking idiots, I would have no problem with that person. I would congratulate him or her, and I would respect that person's courage, because Muslims who grow up and throw out the bullshit risk being murdered.
The problem is Muslim scum, like Christian scum, virtually never grow up. They stick with the cult they were brainwashed to believe, and they abuse their own children with the same insane bullshit.
Does it bother these "moderate" Muslims to belong to an organization that is famous for flying airplanes into buildings, daily suicide bombings (thousands of deranged Muslim assholes are waiting in line to blow themselves up to kill women and children), cutting off heads with a small sharp knife while the victim screams until the head is almost completely removed (I saw a video of these barbaric Muslim subhumans), death penalties for blasphemy, death threats against anyone who ridicules their dead Mohammad, the burkas, the total disrespect for women's rights (they punish rape victims and for adultery they bury the woman up to her neck and then all the cowardly men in the town stone her to death), the cowardly attacks against little girls because they were walking to school (they throw acid into their eyes), and riots and murder because of a cartoon or because someone burned their worthless idiotic Qur'an.
Does any of this stuff bother Muslims? Apparently not because they never consider the advantages of throwing out the Islamic bullshit.
Why do atheist liberals suck up to the Islam Terrorist Organization? Shouldn't a real atheist be in favor of the complete eradication of every religion from this planet? I noticed American liberals have no problem with ridiculing Christian Bible thumpers. So why all this love for Muslim scum?
When Muslim assholes had the nerve to want to build a mosque near their most famous atrocity, the murder of 3,000 civilians on 9/11/2001, atheist liberals had no problem with this insult to America. Why? What the fuck is wrong with these wimpy atheists?
Christians frequently complain about atheists who ridicule Christians but never say anything bad about Muslims. They are wrong to think all atheists are wimpy suck-ups but since the liberal wimps make the most noise I can't blame the Christians for thinking that. Of course one reason many atheists are more interested in attacking the Christian death cult is because Christianity is the majority religion in America and they are causing the most problems, especially with their never ending war against science education. But still it's fair to ask why do atheist American liberals refuse to criticize Muslim retards. And why do atheist wimps cry like babies when another atheist points out the obvious fact that all Muslims are fucking idiots?
When a real atheist ridicules Muslim assholes the liberal loons accuse that person of being a racist, as if Islam is a race and not a death cult. The liberal wimps accuse the real atheist of being Islamophobic, as if there's something wrong with being against beheadings and suicide bombings.
Atheist liberal Americans, I don't know what your fucking problem is. I don't understand your logic. It seems insane to me that an atheist, who should be attacking all religious insanity, gives special treatment and respect to one of the most idiotic cults ever invented.
Perhaps you pretend to love Muslims because you're afraid of them. Or perhaps you're just plain stupid. It's difficult to read the minds of liberal idiots so who knows why they are worthless wimpy suck-ups.
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Jihad Watch
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------
Jihad Watch
Why Jihad Watch?
Because
non-Muslims in the West, as well as in India, China, Russia, and the
world over, are facing a concerted effort by Islamic jihadists, the
motives and goals of whom are largely ignored by the Western media, to
destroy their societies and bring them forcibly into the Islamic world
-- and to commit violence to that end even while their overall goal
remains out of reach. That effort goes under the general rubric of jihad.
Jihad (Arabic for "struggle") is a central duty of every Muslim. Modern Muslim theologians have spoken of many things as jihads: the struggle within the soul, defending the faith from critics, supporting its growth and defense financially, even migrating to non-Muslim lands for the purpose of spreading Islam. But violent jihad is a constant of Islamic history. Many passages of the Qur'an and sayings of the Prophet Muhammad are used by jihad warriors today to justify their actions and gain new recruits. No major Muslim group has ever repudiated the doctrines of armed jihad. The theology of jihad, which denies unbelievers equality of human rights and dignity, is available today for anyone with the will and means to bring it to life.
Jihad Watch is dedicated to bringing public attention to the role that jihad theology and ideology plays in the modern world, and to correcting popular misconceptions about the role of jihad and religion in modern-day conflicts. We hope to alert people of good will to the true nature of the present global conflict.
JIHAD IS A CENTRAL DUTY of every Muslim. Modern Muslim theologians have spoken of many things as jihads: the struggle within the soul, defending the faith from critics, supporting its growth and defense financially, even migrating to non-Muslim lands for the purpose of spreading Islam. But in Islamic history and doctrine violent jihad is founded on numerous verses of the Qur'an -- most notably, one known in Islamic theology as the "Verse of the Sword": "Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is forgiving, merciful" (Sura 9:5). Establishing "regular worship" and paying the "poor-due" (zakat) means essentially that they will become Muslim, as these are two of the central responsibilities of every Muslim. Sahih Bukhari, which Muslims regard as the most trustworthy of all the many collections of traditions of Muhammad, records this statement of the Prophet: "Allah assigns for a person who participates in (holy battles) in Allah's Cause and nothing causes him to do so except belief in Allah and in His Messengers, that he will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty (if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise (if he is killed in the battle as a martyr)."
Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), a pioneering historian and philosopher, was also a legal theorist. In his renowned Muqaddimah, the first work of historical theory, he notes that "in the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force." In Islam, the person in charge of religious affairs is concerned with "power politics," because Islam is "under obligation to gain power over other nations."
Violent jihad is a constant of Islamic history. The passages quoted above and many others like them form a major element of the motivation of jihad warriors worldwide today. No major Muslim group has ever repudiated the doctrines of armed jihad. The theology of jihad, with all its assumptions about unbelievers‚ lack of human rights and dignity, is available today as a justification for anyone with the will and the means to bring it to life.
Jihad Watch is dedicated to bringing public attention to the role that jihad theology and ideology play in the modern world and to correcting popular misconceptions about the role of jihad and religion in modern-day conflicts. By shedding as much light as possible on these matters, we hope to alert people of good will to the true nature of the present global conflict.
Jihad Watch also includes Dhimmi Watch, formerly a separate page on this site, tracking dhimmitude. Dhimmitude is the status that Islamic law, the Sharia, mandates for non-Muslims, primarily Jews and Christians. Dhimmis, "protected people," are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur'an's command that they "feel themselves subdued" (Sura 9:29). This denial of equality of rights and dignity remains part of the Sharia, and, as such, are part of the legal superstructure that global jihadists are laboring to restore everywhere in the Islamic world, and wish ultimately to impose on the entire human race.
If dhimmis complained about their inferior status, institutionalized humiliation, or poverty, their masters voided their contract and regarded them as enemies of Islam, fair game as objects of violence. Consequently, dhimmis were generally cowed into silence and worse. It was almost unheard-of to find dhimmis speaking out against their oppressors; to do so would have been suicide. For centuries dhimmi communities in the Islamic world learned to live in peace with their Muslim overlords by acquiescing to their subservience. Some even actively identified with the dominant class, and became strenuous advocates for it.
Spearheaded by dhimmi academics and self-serving advocacy groups, that same attitude of chastened subservience has entered into Western academic study of Islam, and from there into journalism, school textbooks, and the popular discourse. One must not point out the depredations of jihad and dhimmitude; to do so would offend the multiculturalist ethos that prevails everywhere today. To do so would endanger chances for peace and rapprochement between civilizations all too ready to clash.
But in this era of global terrorism it must be said: this silence, this distortion, has become deadly. Before 9/11 it was easy to ignore and whitewash dhimmitude, but the atrocities changed the situation forever. In jihads throughout history, untold millions have died. Tens of millions have been uprooted from their homes. Tens of millions have been stripped of their cultural identity. To continue to gloss over the destruction wrought by jihad ideology and its attendant evil of dhimmitude is today to play into the hands of jihadists, who have repeatedly vowed to dhimmify the West and destroy any recalcitrant elements. While jihadist groups, even with their global diffusion, are not strong enough to realize this goal by themselves, they have a potent and destructive ally, a genuine fifth column, in the dhimmi academics and dhimmi journalists they have recruited in the West. They have succeeded in confusing millions in the West into mistaking honesty and truthfulness for bigotry, and self-defense for oppression.
Before it's too late for Western Europe and the United States, which gave birth to the traditions of freedom and equality of rights for all that shine today as lights in the entire world, this must be stopped. Therefore Jihad Watch seeks to bring public attention to:
Jihad Watch fights to ensure that deeds done in the darkness for so long will not continue to be done. The light of world attention is anathema to the proponents of jihad and dhimmitude: we have seen in recent years that women sentenced to stoning for adultery, often victims of rape unjustly accused thanks to Sharia laws disallowing rape victims' testimony, were freed following international outcry. Jihad Watch seeks to provoke similar, continuous and increasing outcry wherever and whenever the Sharia's institutionalized injustices threaten dhimmis and women.
May the truth prevail.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jihad (Arabic for "struggle") is a central duty of every Muslim. Modern Muslim theologians have spoken of many things as jihads: the struggle within the soul, defending the faith from critics, supporting its growth and defense financially, even migrating to non-Muslim lands for the purpose of spreading Islam. But violent jihad is a constant of Islamic history. Many passages of the Qur'an and sayings of the Prophet Muhammad are used by jihad warriors today to justify their actions and gain new recruits. No major Muslim group has ever repudiated the doctrines of armed jihad. The theology of jihad, which denies unbelievers equality of human rights and dignity, is available today for anyone with the will and means to bring it to life.
Jihad Watch is dedicated to bringing public attention to the role that jihad theology and ideology plays in the modern world, and to correcting popular misconceptions about the role of jihad and religion in modern-day conflicts. We hope to alert people of good will to the true nature of the present global conflict.
JIHAD IS A CENTRAL DUTY of every Muslim. Modern Muslim theologians have spoken of many things as jihads: the struggle within the soul, defending the faith from critics, supporting its growth and defense financially, even migrating to non-Muslim lands for the purpose of spreading Islam. But in Islamic history and doctrine violent jihad is founded on numerous verses of the Qur'an -- most notably, one known in Islamic theology as the "Verse of the Sword": "Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is forgiving, merciful" (Sura 9:5). Establishing "regular worship" and paying the "poor-due" (zakat) means essentially that they will become Muslim, as these are two of the central responsibilities of every Muslim. Sahih Bukhari, which Muslims regard as the most trustworthy of all the many collections of traditions of Muhammad, records this statement of the Prophet: "Allah assigns for a person who participates in (holy battles) in Allah's Cause and nothing causes him to do so except belief in Allah and in His Messengers, that he will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty (if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise (if he is killed in the battle as a martyr)."
Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), a pioneering historian and philosopher, was also a legal theorist. In his renowned Muqaddimah, the first work of historical theory, he notes that "in the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force." In Islam, the person in charge of religious affairs is concerned with "power politics," because Islam is "under obligation to gain power over other nations."
Violent jihad is a constant of Islamic history. The passages quoted above and many others like them form a major element of the motivation of jihad warriors worldwide today. No major Muslim group has ever repudiated the doctrines of armed jihad. The theology of jihad, with all its assumptions about unbelievers‚ lack of human rights and dignity, is available today as a justification for anyone with the will and the means to bring it to life.
Jihad Watch is dedicated to bringing public attention to the role that jihad theology and ideology play in the modern world and to correcting popular misconceptions about the role of jihad and religion in modern-day conflicts. By shedding as much light as possible on these matters, we hope to alert people of good will to the true nature of the present global conflict.
Jihad Watch also includes Dhimmi Watch, formerly a separate page on this site, tracking dhimmitude. Dhimmitude is the status that Islamic law, the Sharia, mandates for non-Muslims, primarily Jews and Christians. Dhimmis, "protected people," are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur'an's command that they "feel themselves subdued" (Sura 9:29). This denial of equality of rights and dignity remains part of the Sharia, and, as such, are part of the legal superstructure that global jihadists are laboring to restore everywhere in the Islamic world, and wish ultimately to impose on the entire human race.
If dhimmis complained about their inferior status, institutionalized humiliation, or poverty, their masters voided their contract and regarded them as enemies of Islam, fair game as objects of violence. Consequently, dhimmis were generally cowed into silence and worse. It was almost unheard-of to find dhimmis speaking out against their oppressors; to do so would have been suicide. For centuries dhimmi communities in the Islamic world learned to live in peace with their Muslim overlords by acquiescing to their subservience. Some even actively identified with the dominant class, and became strenuous advocates for it.
Spearheaded by dhimmi academics and self-serving advocacy groups, that same attitude of chastened subservience has entered into Western academic study of Islam, and from there into journalism, school textbooks, and the popular discourse. One must not point out the depredations of jihad and dhimmitude; to do so would offend the multiculturalist ethos that prevails everywhere today. To do so would endanger chances for peace and rapprochement between civilizations all too ready to clash.
But in this era of global terrorism it must be said: this silence, this distortion, has become deadly. Before 9/11 it was easy to ignore and whitewash dhimmitude, but the atrocities changed the situation forever. In jihads throughout history, untold millions have died. Tens of millions have been uprooted from their homes. Tens of millions have been stripped of their cultural identity. To continue to gloss over the destruction wrought by jihad ideology and its attendant evil of dhimmitude is today to play into the hands of jihadists, who have repeatedly vowed to dhimmify the West and destroy any recalcitrant elements. While jihadist groups, even with their global diffusion, are not strong enough to realize this goal by themselves, they have a potent and destructive ally, a genuine fifth column, in the dhimmi academics and dhimmi journalists they have recruited in the West. They have succeeded in confusing millions in the West into mistaking honesty and truthfulness for bigotry, and self-defense for oppression.
Before it's too late for Western Europe and the United States, which gave birth to the traditions of freedom and equality of rights for all that shine today as lights in the entire world, this must be stopped. Therefore Jihad Watch seeks to bring public attention to:
- The plight of the dhimmis, an immense but almost completely ignored ongoing scandal that continues in Muslim countries today;
- The plight of women under Sharia provisions, similar to conditions imposed on dhimmis, in the denial of equal rights and dignity;
- Slavery in Islamic lands, which continues today, justified by Sharia-'s dhimmi codes;
- The integral role of jihad and dhimmitude ideology in global terrorism today;
- The license that academic and journalistic whitewashes of dhimmitude gives to radical jihadist enemies of human rights for all.
Jihad Watch fights to ensure that deeds done in the darkness for so long will not continue to be done. The light of world attention is anathema to the proponents of jihad and dhimmitude: we have seen in recent years that women sentenced to stoning for adultery, often victims of rape unjustly accused thanks to Sharia laws disallowing rape victims' testimony, were freed following international outcry. Jihad Watch seeks to provoke similar, continuous and increasing outcry wherever and whenever the Sharia's institutionalized injustices threaten dhimmis and women.
May the truth prevail.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.