If you look at the universe and study the universe, what you find is that there is no evidence that we need anything other than the laws of physics and the other laws of science to explain everything we see. There's absolutely no evidence that we need any supernatural hand of god. -- Lawrence Krauss, World-Renowned Physicist
There is probably no other notion in any field of science that has been as extensively tested and as thoroughly corroborated as the evolutionary origin of living organisms. -- Encyclopedia Britannica
FAITH. No one word personifies the absolute worst and most wicked properties of religion better than that. Faith is mind-rot. It’s the poison that destroys critical thinking, undermines evidence, and leads people into lives dedicated to absurdity. It’s a parasite regarded as a virtue. -- PZ Myers
Religion is the antithesis of science, an anesthetic for the mind that disables critical thought and encourages the acceptance of inanity as fact, and wishful thinking as evidence. -- PZ Myers

Friday, January 28, 2011

Breathtaking inanity and why the dead Jeebus lost in a federal court.

All creationists are uneducated morons. As Christian fundamentalists correctly say, their dead Jeebus was a creationist. Therefore Jeebus was an uneducated moron.

If you're a Christian but you accept the facts of evolutionary biology, you're probably still a creationist because Christians virtually always stick their creator into evolution (as if magic is one of its mechanisms).

If you're one of the rare Christians who accept evolution and who also agree a magic god fairy had absolutely nothing to do with it (god did not invent, guide, or use evolution) then you're not a creationist. You're not much of a Christian either. You are admitting your dead Jeebus was an uneducated moron. Since you accept evolution without magic I have to wonder why you would want to worship a dead creationist. I also have to wonder why you believe in a magic god fairy who never had to perform any magic tricks. Maybe you should consider the advantages of growing up.

My point is real Christians are evolution deniers (they either completely deny evolution or even worse they pollute evolution with god bullshit).

This post is about the Christian war against science education and the federal judge in Dover Pennsylvania who wrote in 2005 about the breathtaking inanity of the Christian assholes who unsuccessfully tried to force biology teachers to read a pro-magic anti-science statement to their students. The biology teachers refused to cooperate and the Christian assholes wasted one million dollars of taxpayer money for legal bills when the judge ruled against them and their dead Jeebus.

Why did this federal judge defend science education instead of letting Christian assholes destroy science education? He really didn't have any choice. At the trial the Christian assholes repeatedly demonstrated their dishonesty and stupidity while the biologists brilliantly defended the established truth of evolution. The evidence was overwhelmingly in favor of science and against the dead Jeebus.

The Dover trial was more than five years ago. Why am I writing about it now? Because the dishonesty of the assholes who wanted to dumb down science education to accommodate their dead Jeebus is a good example for why I have so much contempt for Christians. The trial showed the true nature of Christians, their willingness to spread lies for Jeebus, their desire to destroy science education and our nation's future, their total lack of any moral values, and their breathtaking stupidity.


Christians are enemies of America, equal to terrorists, and they deserve to be ridiculed relentlessly.

The rest of this post is from the 139-page Dover trial decision written by John E. Jones III United States District Judge.

In summary, the disclaimer singles out the theory of evolution for special treatment, misrepresents its status in the scientific community, causes students to doubt its validity without scientific justification, presents students with a religious alternative masquerading as a scientific theory, directs them to consult a creationist text as though it were a science resource, and instructs students to forego scientific inquiry in the public school classroom and instead to seek out religious instruction elsewhere.


The citizens of the Dover area were poorly served by the members of the Board who voted for the ID Policy. It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie to cover their tracks and disguise the real purpose behind the ID Policy.


Those who disagree with our holding will likely mark it as the product of an activist judge. If so, they will have erred as this is manifestly not an activist Court. Rather, this case came to us as the result of the activism of an ill-informed faction on a school board, aided by a national public interest law firm eager to find a constitutional test case on ID, who in combination drove the Board to adopt an imprudent and ultimately unconstitutional policy. The breathtaking inanity of the Board’s decision is evident when considered against the factual backdrop which has now been fully revealed through this trial. The students, parents, and teachers of the Dover Area School District deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom, with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources.

No comments:

Post a Comment