A Catholic idiot wrote "Natural science cannot dogmatically rule out the possibility that there are purposeful designs in creation." Somebody else wrote why this is wrong, not to mention stupid. This post is a copy & paste job.

"Natural science cannot dogmatically rule out the possibility that there are purposeful designs in creation."

Of course it is all superstitious nonsense.

Yes. There was no first man or first woman. Our species evolved from a previous population gene
pool gradually over time, both through anagenesis and cladogenesis. However if you read what the
pope said that as a catholic you must believe that we evolved from a first set of human parents,
then you can see how this is in contradiction to the scientific evidence which clearly shows this
is extremely highly improbable. If an imaginary soul was instilled into humans at some point in
time as the doctrine and dogma of the church insists, then if every child is the same species as
that of his parents, the child had a soul but the parent did not. What nonsense is this?

In reality what the pope was saying to catholics is that you can accept the fact of biological
evolution of humans as long as you do not accept the fact of evolution. This is of course a pure
example of Double think. Surely, the catholic church's dogma and doctrine is truely just made up
superstitious nonsense. I am really enjoying them doing a tap dance around evolution which is
totally incompatable with their doctrine and dogma. Original Sin is just made up nonsense.

http://www.catholic365.com/article/1705/does-the-catholic-church-accept-evolution.html

http://www.catholic365.com