If you look at the universe and study the universe, what you find is that there is no evidence that we need anything other than the laws of physics and the other laws of science to explain everything we see. There's absolutely no evidence that we need any supernatural hand of god. -- Lawrence Krauss, World-Renowned Physicist
There is probably no other notion in any field of science that has been as extensively tested and as thoroughly corroborated as the evolutionary origin of living organisms. -- Encyclopedia Britannica
FAITH. No one word personifies the absolute worst and most wicked properties of religion better than that. Faith is mind-rot. It’s the poison that destroys critical thinking, undermines evidence, and leads people into lives dedicated to absurdity. It’s a parasite regarded as a virtue. -- PZ Myers
Religion is the antithesis of science, an anesthetic for the mind that disables critical thought and encourages the acceptance of inanity as fact, and wishful thinking as evidence. -- PZ Myers

Friday, February 22, 2013

Question for creationists: Do you ever worry about being wrong about everything?

Creationists are so fucking hopelessly stupid. You should see their replies to the questions I asked on Yahoo Answers at Question for creationists: Do you ever worry about being wrong about everything? How can these retards call themselves human? I've met dogs with more intelligence.

This is what I wrote at Yahoo Answers. You can see Question for creationists: Do you ever worry about being wrong about everything? to read their insane brain-dead answers.

You creationists should worry about being wrong because virtually every biologist in the world knows you're wrong. They don't think you're wrong. The world's biologists are 100% for sure certain you are wrong to be an evolution denier. It's for a good reason biologists say creationists are equal to flat-earthers.

When biologists say evolution is the strongest fact of science do you think they're lying? The biologists who work for the best encyclopedia in the world, the Encyclopedia Britannica, wrote "There is probably no other notion in any field of science that has been as extensively tested and as thoroughly corroborated as the evolutionary origin of living organisms." Do you think the Encyclopedia Britannica is dishonest?


Here's some quotes from two other biologists:

"Even without fossils, we have evidence of human evolution from comparative anatomy, embryology, our vestigial traits, and even biogeography. We've learned of our fishlike embryos, our dead genes, our transitory fetal coat of hair, and our poor design, all testifying to our origins. The fossil record is really the icing on the cake."
-- Jerry Coyne, University of Chicago biologist, author of Why Evolution is True

"The denial of evolution requires denial of the bedrock of two centuries of biology and geology. That is quite a feat."
-- Sean B. Carroll, Professor of Molecular Biology, Genetics, and Medical Genetics at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, author of The Making of the Fittest: DNA and the Ultimate Forensic Record of Evolution

"For all of those who do see the overwhelming evidence of natural selection and life's descent from ancestors, and the immense span of time over which the story of life unfolded, it is, to put it mildly, baffling how so many still do not. It is absolutely astonishing and often infuriating that some take it so far as to deny the immense foundation of evidence and to slander all the human achievement that foundation represents."
-- Sean B. Carroll

Do you creationists think being wrong about where we came from is a waste of a life?

Do you creationists think maybe you should study evolution to find out what you're missing? I think you should.   

No comments:

Post a Comment