Saturday, February 16, 2013

A fucking idiot wrote "I made the point that many seek to promote a false conflict between a religious understanding and a scientific understanding of the world."

People who are pro-science but still suck up to religious insanity have my complete contempt.

Here's an example. A wimp pretends there's no conflict between a god's magic wand and science.

Bill to allow dialogue on creationism is unnecessary

In a similar article recently, I made the point that many seek to promote a false conflict between a religious understanding and a scientific understanding of the world. The real arena where these two perspectives play out is in the contemplation of Cosmology, and it is there that there that one perception may inform the other.

My reply:

"I made the point that many seek to promote a false conflict between a religious understanding and a scientific understanding of the world."

False conflict between supernatural magic and science? What is false about it?

Religion has always been insane. Science has made religion unnecessary.

"The real arena where these two perspectives play out is in the contemplation of Cosmology, and it is there that there that one perception may inform the other."

That's nuts. You are saying magic may inform science. How are you any different from a deranged Bible thumper?

No comments:

Post a Comment