For fun I asked some Christian retards a question about something in biology that only makes sense in the light of evolution. I am waiting for the moronic answers.

Christian creationists who don't like evolution, how do explain Lanugo?

From Why Evolution is True by Jerry Coyne: "One of my favorite cases of embryological evidence for evolution is the furry human fetus. We are famously known as "naked apes" because, unlike other primates, we don't have a thick coat of hair. But in fact for one brief period we do--as embryos. Around sixth months after conception, we become completely covered with a fine, downy coat of hair called lanugo. Lanugo is usually shed about a month before birth, when it's replaced by the more sparsely distributed hair with which we're born. (Premature infants, however, are sometimes born with lanugo, which soon falls off.) Now, there's no need for a human embryo to have a transitory coat of hair. After all, it's a cozy 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit in the womb. Lanugo can be explained only as a remnant of our primate ancestry: fetal monkeys also develop a coat of hair at about the same stage of development. Their hair, however, doesn't fall out, but hangs on to become the adult coat. And, like humans, fetal whales also have lanugo, a remnant of when their ancestors lived on land." 

Source: http://darwinkilledgod.blogspot.com/2010/12/lanugo-makes-jeebus-cry.html

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20171008182724AADnF5J&sort=N