Creationism is not science. In science if evidence comes to light that shows a hypothesis to be wrong, you reject or change the hypothesis. In creationism if evidence shows the hypothesis to be wrong, you reject the evidence.
I see people are still trotting out Piltdown Man which was presented in 1912 and exposed as a forgery in 1953. It was not accepted as real by everyone from the start. It was exposed by science and scientists, not creationists. If the best argument creationists have is a fraud that was exposed by science 64 years ago then creationism has little going for it.
Since Piltdown Man, of course, many hundreds of hominin fossils have been discovered showing the evolutionary path of humans from our separation from the chimpanzee line some six million years ago.
I see people are still trotting out Piltdown Man which was presented in 1912 and exposed as a forgery in 1953. It was not accepted as real by everyone from the start. It was exposed by science and scientists, not creationists. If the best argument creationists have is a fraud that was exposed by science 64 years ago then creationism has little going for it.
Since Piltdown Man, of course, many hundreds of hominin fossils have been discovered showing the evolutionary path of humans from our separation from the chimpanzee line some six million years ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.