If you look at the universe and study the universe, what you find is that there is no evidence that we need anything other than the laws of physics and the other laws of science to explain everything we see. There's absolutely no evidence that we need any supernatural hand of god. -- Lawrence Krauss, World-Renowned Physicist
There is probably no other notion in any field of science that has been as extensively tested and as thoroughly corroborated as the evolutionary origin of living organisms. -- Encyclopedia Britannica
FAITH. No one word personifies the absolute worst and most wicked properties of religion better than that. Faith is mind-rot. It’s the poison that destroys critical thinking, undermines evidence, and leads people into lives dedicated to absurdity. It’s a parasite regarded as a virtue. -- PZ Myers
Religion is the antithesis of science, an anesthetic for the mind that disables critical thought and encourages the acceptance of inanity as fact, and wishful thinking as evidence. -- PZ Myers

Monday, May 15, 2017

The stupid, it burns.

"William Lane Craig"

"William Lane Craig is an American analytic philosopher and Christian apologist."

"Michael Behe"

He's another liar for Jeebus. He disgraces his university.

If you get all your science information from science deniers you're never going to learn anything. Also your Craig is not a scientist. He obviously knows nothing about biology.

I suggest study and at least try to understand what real scientists say about evolution which is the strongest fact of science and the foundation of biology. Please read Why Evolution Is True by Jerry Coyne and read it again until you understand it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateEvolution/comments/68n8j8/where_are_all_the_creationists/

A question I asked:

submitted  by BobCu
The problem with creationists is they go out of their way to know nothing about the science they don't like. Instead they depend on professional liars for their science information.
Has any creationist read "Why Evolution Is True" by Jerry Coyne, University of Chicago biologist? Probably not. If creationists did read it and tried to understand it instead of looking for imaginary problems, they would not be creationists.
The idea is to learn something. The time creationists spend complaining about evolution would be better spent trying to understand how evolution works and the overwhelming evidence that shows it's the strongest fact of science.
They are never going to learn anything about science from science deniers like Behe and the countless other know-nothing professional liars.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateEvolution/comments/6b8qjy/a_question_for_creationists_who_refuse_to_read/

UPDATE: THESE FUCKING IDIOTS DIDN'T PUBLISH WHAT I WROTE.

No comments:

Post a Comment