If you look at the universe and study the universe, what you find is that there is no evidence that we need anything other than the laws of physics and the other laws of science to explain everything we see. There's absolutely no evidence that we need any supernatural hand of god. -- Lawrence Krauss, World-Renowned Physicist
There is probably no other notion in any field of science that has been as extensively tested and as thoroughly corroborated as the evolutionary origin of living organisms. -- Encyclopedia Britannica
FAITH. No one word personifies the absolute worst and most wicked properties of religion better than that. Faith is mind-rot. It’s the poison that destroys critical thinking, undermines evidence, and leads people into lives dedicated to absurdity. It’s a parasite regarded as a virtue. -- PZ Myers
Religion is the antithesis of science, an anesthetic for the mind that disables critical thought and encourages the acceptance of inanity as fact, and wishful thinking as evidence. -- PZ Myers

Friday, July 4, 2014

Is evolution evidence for or against god?

Evolution makes the magic fairy unnecessary. New species can and have developed without the fairy's magic wand. If the fairy is not necessary for something as complex as that, then it's fair to say the fairy's magical powers are not necessary for anything else. 

Darwin killed God in 1859. Not everyone got the memo but the fairy is dead.


A dipshit wrote "Evidence something is unnecessary is not evidence it does not exist"

My reply:

Do you want to believe in a magic fairy who never had anything to do? The universe doesn't need a fairy for anything. So what's it there for? Nothing. It's fair to say the fairy is not real. And even without the science the fairy is the most childish fantasy ever invented.

"Is evolution evidence for or against god?" Out of 26 answers I wrote the only possible correct answer. This shows that this website is about 99% idiots. Even the fake atheists here are dipshits.

No comments:

Post a Comment