Richard Dawkins will always have my respect because of his excellent book The Greatest Show on Earth, The Evidence for Evolution. Unfortunately he fucked up.
Richard Dawkins is suppose to be the world's most famous atheist but he's isn't an atheist. He's an agnostic fucktard.
Would a real atheist say something this stupid and this wimpy?
From Richard Dawkins: '6.9 out of seven' sure that God does not exist:
There was surprise when Prof Dawkins acknowledged that he was less than 100 percent certain of his conviction that there is no creator. The philosopher Sir Anthony Kenny, who chaired the discussion, interjected: “Why don’t you call yourself an agnostic?” Prof Dawkins answered that he did. An incredulous Sir Anthony replied: “You are described as the world’s most famous atheist.” Prof Dawkins said that he was “6.9 out of seven” sure of his beliefs. “I think the probability of a supernatural creator existing is very very low,” he added.
I have some questions for Mr. Dawkins and I will guess what his answers might be (I'm not going to try to imitate his British way of saying things).
---------------------------------------------
Mr. Dawkins, do you believe leprechauns are real?
Of course not.
Are you sure?
Of course I'm sure. Leprechauns are a myth. There's couldn't possibly be any leprechauns.
Do you believe Easter Bunnies are real?
No.
Are you sure?
Of course I'm sure.
Do you believe there is a magic fairy (also known as god) hiding somewhere in the universe waving a magic wand to create stuff?
No.
Are you sure?
I'm almost 100% certain there are no magic fairies.
Are you actually saying there might be magic fairies?
I say the odds of there being any fairies with unlimited magical powers is only 0.1 out of 7.
---------------------------------------------
I don't think Mr. Dawkins would say there's a 0.1 out of 7 chance of leprechauns and Easter Bunnies being real but for some strange reason the most famous atheist in the world has decided he would rather be a fake atheist. His "I think the probability of a supernatural creator existing is very very low." is exactly what I would expect from a full-of-shit agnostic retard.
When this idiotic bullshit was published other atheists defended Mr. Dawkins and his wimpy "I think the probability of a supernatural creator existing is very very low." There's no excuse for this stupidity. A person is either an atheist or he isn't an atheist. Richard Dawkins is not an atheist and every idiot who defended Mr. Dawkins is not an atheist.
God is just another word for magic. The question is "Can magic be real?" The correct answer is "I'm 100% absolutely certain magic is bullshit". Anyone who doesn't agree is a fucking idiot. With all due respect Mr. Dawkins, you're an idiot.
The bible thumpers and the terrorists love people like Mr. Dawkins. Dawkins has decided to become part of the religious insanity problem.
"Darwin was the first to use data from nature to convince people that evolution is true, and his idea of natural selection was truly novel. It testifies to his genius that the concept of natural theology, accepted by most educated Westerners before 1859, was vanquished within only a few years by a single five-hundred-page book. On the Origin of Species turned the mysteries of life's diversity from mythology into genuine science." -- Jerry Coyne
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.