James Peri Colorado November 20, 2017
Much of this echoes my experience teaching evolutionary biology at a state university for 30 years, mostly in a second semester introductory biology course for mixed majors. Periodically, a student in one of the large lecture classes (200+ students) would ask why I didn't include creation in the course. Invariably, the student would be referring to the biblical account. My first response was that my educational background was in science not religion and so I did not have the professional background to do justice to the teaching of creation, which would be best taught in a department of religious studies. I would also add that I would be hard pressed to choose among the thousands of creation stories from cultures around the world. Teaching in the Southwest, there were invariably Native American students in my classes from several tribes, each with their own account of creation, as well as students from many other traditions. I would conclude that as a professor in the Biology Department, my mandate was to teach provide a up to date introduction to evolutionary biology, emphasizing the material evidence on which the field of study is based. This explanation, respectfully offered, always seemed to satisfy concerned students.
I should add that I never had such questions raised when teaching abroad. The perception of a conflict between science and religion seems to be a peculiarly American concern.
"Darwin was the first to use data from nature to convince people that evolution is true, and his idea of natural selection was truly novel. It testifies to his genius that the concept of natural theology, accepted by most educated Westerners before 1859, was vanquished within only a few years by a single five-hundred-page book. On the Origin of Species turned the mysteries of life's diversity from mythology into genuine science." -- Jerry Coyne
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.