Monday, June 10, 2013

Creationists, are you able to defend magical creationism without attacking evolution by natural selection?

My point is evidence against something is not evidence for something else. When you say evolution is false that doesn't mean magical creationism is true.

There is of course no evidence against evolution but if we wanted to pretend evolution has some big problem, that would not be evidence for anything else. You have to be able to defend your magical creationism without attacking evolution. Can you do that? Do you want to try? Go ahead and defend your magical creation out of nothing without once mentioning anything about evolution.

******************************************************

I asked this question at the Yahoo Answers religion section. So far in a website infested with creationist retards there has been no answers. I'm not surprised. If there's any answers later that are not too insane I will copy and paste them to this post for your entertainment.

No comments:

Post a Comment