"Why do creationists infer design without first demonstrating that there is in fact a designer?"
The know-nothing science deniers just assume the Magic Man is real.
This is a translation of all their ideas: "If I don't understand how something evolved then the Magic Man did it." "Complexity therefore magic."
It helps to know nothing about evolution and this is why the evolution deniers go out of their way to know nothing. Obviously it's a stupidity problem. Also they have zero curiosity, probably because religious brainwashing sucked all their curiosity out of them.
I don't waste my time with these morons. I just tell them to google "wikipedia evidence for evolution" and then I tell them to do their own homework. I'm not going to hold their hand. Of course they never look things up. Google makes them cry.
The extreme stupid, it burns.
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
These is lots of good stuff at http://darwinkilledgod.blogspot.com/2017/
"Darwin was the first to use data from nature to convince people that evolution is true, and his idea of natural selection was truly novel. It testifies to his genius that the concept of natural theology, accepted by most educated Westerners before 1859, was vanquished within only a few years by a single five-hundred-page book. On the Origin of Species turned the mysteries of life's diversity from mythology into genuine science." -- Jerry Coyne
Thursday, June 21, 2018
I answered this question: "Why do creationists infer design without first demonstrating that there is in fact a designer?"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.