What I wrote for the liberal fucktards at the New York Times.

I wrote this for the liberal fucktards:

Thank goodness for Mike Bloomberg. He is the only Democratic candidate who can defeat Trump.

I don't understand why some people complain about his 50 billion dollars. Being brilliant and successful is a good thing.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Another example of extreme stupidity is the Republicans. Most of them don't like Bloomberg, and always it's for stupid reasons.

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Somebody from Ohio wrote this and I agree with it:

I care about candidates’ policies and experience and not about their wealth. Bloomberg was an excellent mayor (I’m a former NYCer and very familiar with/critical of his problematic policies and still think he beats Dinkins, Guiliani and DeBlasio hands down), an outstanding philanthropist, and entirely self-made. In response to the conspiracy theorists out there who think he’s running to protect the plutocracy, I haven’t seen any proof that Bloomberg is in anyone’s pocket or catering to any corporate interests in his decision to run, have you? And as far as his personal wealth goes, from my middle-class vantage point, his billions vs. Warren’s millions don’t seem all that different. I truly believe Bloomberg is running because he thinks he can do a good job on our behalf. And he’s definitely got the work ethic and pragmatism to get the job done right.