I asked some Christian fucktards how can they defend their childish creationism fantasy. I tried to be as nice as possible so I used the 1st version of this question instead of the 2nd version which I prefer. I never met a Christian who wasn't a fucking moron.

If evolution is wrong that doesn't mean creationism is correct. Can creationism be defended without complaining about evolution?

For example, without complaining about evolution, how can creationists prove all species were created by God? Do you creationists have anything that isn't a Bible quote?

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••

If evolution is wrong that doesn't mean magical creationism is correct. Can the childish magical creationism fantasy be defended without complaining about evolution?

For example, without complaining about evolution, how can you know-nothing creationist fucktards prove all species were magically created by your magic god fairy? Do you science deniers have anything that isn't a moronic bible quote?

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••

The fucktards who answered the question used their fucktard bible even though I told them not to do that.

The stupidity in Idiot America is overwhelming.

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••

This is what a normal person wrote. Well done.

That's an essential flaw in creationist thinking--this forced duality--that the only two possible alternatives are evolution or creation, such that if evolution is "wrong," then creation must automatically be right--which completely ignores the fact that there is no positive evidence favoring creation. So, even if evolution were found to be wrong tomorrow, there is still no reason other than personal religious belief to name creation as the default alternative.