The New York Times and the Washington Post: Dishonest stupid fucking assholes.

Behind the media's breathtakingly dishonest coverage of Trump's Mount Rushmore speech

By Michael Barone

July 08, 2020

“I don’t think I’ve ever seen such dishonest and biased coverage of any event.” That was Brit Hume, who has been covering events for more than 50 years for Fox News, ABC News, and investigative reporter Jack Anderson.

The event, as you may have guessed, was President Trump’s Independence (without the scare quotes) Day speech at Mount Rushmore.

The speech was, according to the New York Times headline, a “dark and divisive speech” designed to deliver a “divisive culture war message.” The Washington Post called it a “dystopian speech” and a “push to amplify racism.”

Absent from their stories were quotations supporting racism or anything else in their characterization. Nor did Illinois Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth supply any quotations to support her claim that Trump “spent all his time talking about dead traitors.” Trump, in fact, mentioned no Confederates or Confederate statues in his speech, but he did quote the "Battle Hymn of the Republic."

The great bulk of Trump’s speech was a celebration of American history, American principles, and American leaders. He spoke extensively of the four presidents whose visages were sculpted on the mountain above him, and he paid tribute more succinctly to others.

“We are the country of Andrew Jackson, Ulysses S. Grant, and Frederick Douglass. We are the land of Wild Bill Hickock and Buffalo Bill Cody. We are the nation that gave rise to the Wright brothers, the Tuskegee Airmen, Harriet Tubman, Clara Barton, Jesse Owens, George Patton — Gen. George Patton — the great Louis Armstrong, Alan Shepard, Elvis Presley, and Muhammad Ali.”

Dark and divisive? Dystopian? Amplifying racism?

What really seems to have raised the media’s hackles were Trump’s dissents from their own reverent attitudes toward the Black Lives Matter movement, as well as their apparent indifference to those tearing down statues of Abraham Lincoln, Frederick Douglass, Grant, abolitionists, and women’s rights advocates.

“Angry mobs are trying to tear down statues of our founders, deface our most sacred memorials, and unleash a wave of violent crime in our cities,” Trump said, accurately.

That’s not the message most in the media want voters receiving and processing in the months running up to November. Television viewers have been assured that Black Lives Matter protests are “mostly peaceful,” even while fires are blazing fiercely within camera-view. Newspaper readers have been assured that those seizing control of the streets and ousting police are promoting, in the Seattle mayor’s words, a “summer of love,” even as their camp becomes the scene of multiple homicides.

Opinion writers are avoiding mention of the fact that homicides and murders in New York, Chicago, and numerous other cities have suddenly risen far above the numbers for 2019 and previous years. Most of the dead are black, but apparently, those black lives don’t really matter.

Media sensibilities may also have been injured when Trump spoke of a “far-left fascism,” one of whose “political weapons is ‘Cancel Culture’ — driving people from their jobs, shaming dissenters, and demanding total submission from anyone who disagrees.”

This may cut uncomfortably close to home, coming just a few weeks after the defenestration of the New York Times editorial page editor for running an opinion article urging the same tactic (deployment of federal troops) that ended the rioting and bloodshed in Los Angeles in 1992 and Detroit in 1967.

Underlining Trump’s point, Harper’s Magazine printed an open letter affirming (after some anti-Trump throat clearing) free expression, signed by 150 writers of varying views — only to have some signers withdraw their signature. “I am so sorry,” tweeted one, while another said free expression “directly endangers the lives of trans people” and a non-signer tattled to her boss that a colleague had signed.

For these media denizens, verbal disagreement is violence, whereas violent rioting is a “mostly peaceful” expression of opinion. They say, or they feel compelled by newsroom pressure to say, that Trump is divisive because he’s accusing them, quite accurately, of being divisive.

In the Charlottesville controversy, Trump was ridiculed for predicting that statue protesters would target George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. Well, the New York Times has run opinion articles advocating just that — Washington and Jefferson.

And lest you think Trump is exaggerating about “cancel culture,” consider that Thomas Chatterton Williams, one of the organizers of the Harper’s letter, tweeted about “the climate of fear that led many people you know and admire to tell us in confidence that they agreed but were afraid to sign.”

Or as National Review editor Rich Lowry writes, “I suspect that the very journalists who scoff at Trump’s description of the culture war all know that if they or their colleagues say something disparaging or even skeptical about Black Lives Matter, their jobs would instantly be at risk.”

Hence the dishonest and biased press coverage of Trump’s Mount Rushmore speech. Expect a lot more of this in the months to come.