"Darwin was the first to use data from nature to convince people that evolution is true, and his idea of natural selection was truly novel. It testifies to his genius that the concept of natural theology, accepted by most educated Westerners before 1859, was vanquished within only a few years by a single five-hundred-page book. On the Origin of Species turned the mysteries of life's diversity from mythology into genuine science." -- Jerry Coyne
Friday, October 7, 2011
Mitt Romney, who was a draft dodger in the 1960's, wants to continue wasting young American lives in our ten year old religious war in Afghanistan.
Please see Mitt Romney invoked his idiotic religion to avoid being drafted into the United States Army.
Also please see Romney has been critical of President Barack Obama's foreign policy, particularly the president's aggressive timeline to withdraw troops from Afghanistan.
I'm a Republican who usually votes for Democrats because virtually all Republican politicians are god-soaked idiots.
If you live in a normal country (anywhere except Idiot America) you might not know who Mitt Romney is. He is the Republican politician who is now most likely to be President Obama's opponent in the November 2012 election. An idiot from Texas, Rick Perry, used to be ahead of Romney in the polls, but Perry has shown himself to be too breathtakingly stupid to be elected even by brain-dead Republican voters. I sure wasn't going to vote for the anti-science Christian asshole Rick Perry. I thought I might be able to vote for Mitt Romney but now I doubt it.
I have some problems with Mitt Romney. For example even though he accepts the facts of evolutionary biology, he is not able to do this without sticking his supernatural magic fairy in there somewhere. Visitors to this blog might have noticed I don't have a very high opinion of religious assholes and Romney is way too religious.
Romney recently said "God did not create this country to be a nation of followers".
Romney, your magic fairy didn't create this country, period. Your fairy didn't create anything but you believe in it anyway because you're a brainwashed idiot. Even worse, you're a Mormon, a religion so batshit crazy even Bible thumpers make fun of it.
But this post is not about Romney's religion disease. This post is about his desire to sacrifice more American lives in Afghanistan even though he was too cowardly to join (or get drafted into) the US Army when there was another never-ending war going on, Vietnam.
Romney is a cowardly asshole who wants to sacrifice the lives of other people to make himself popular with America's Republican idiots.
Ten years in Afghanistan is long enough. America can't afford it anymore and it's immoral to let American soldiers get killed or lose limbs for the Muslim scum of a worthless dirt-bag country.
Obama isn't much better. He wants to drag out a war we can't win and can't afford, not caring about the wasted lives and not caring about the fact that under his administration our country's credit rating was lowered for the first time in history thanks to his out of control spending.
Incredibly Romney wants to drag out this religious war even longer. Romney, why don't you go there and sacrifice yourself if you think our invasion ten years ago hasn't gone on long enough.
I wrote other posts about Afghanistan including these two posts:
Two news articles provide good reasons for America to declare victory and leave Afghanistan immediately.
The suicide bomber religion
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
A challenge for Christian assholes
I respond to an atheist wimp who thinks everyone should suck up to religious idiots and everyone should study their childish fantasies.
This was my reply (which is awaiting either moderation or censorship):
Human Ape | October 5, 2011 at 9:44 am |
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
“Ultimately, greater curiosity with respect to the views one opposes and deeper self-reflection on the nature of one’s own views would make a more civil, thoughtful, and careful public debate about religion and atheism possible.”
I agree with Dawkins. Curiosity about childish idiotic nonsense (every religious fantasy ever invented) is a waste of time. Who cares which god fairy did what? It’s like astrology which is equally insane. Does a person have to be an expert about astrology to know it’s bullshit?
Be more civil? Should we be more civil towards terrorists because they’re religious? Should we be civil towards religious people who brainwash children and threaten biology teachers? I don’t think so.
There’s nothing scientific about the Resurrection fantasy therefore every Christian belongs to an anti-science organization. Every Muslim belongs to the terrorist organization called Islam. Every religious person, no matter what childish fantasies they believe in, they all brainwash innocent children. If these people had any decency they would throw out their idiotic cults. They all deserve contempt.
“Tone matters, because too many have been insufficiently fierce in their criticism of pious excuses for sloppy thinking. Tone matters because we haven’t been rude enough in the face of special claims of privilege for religious inanity. We need to flip that tone argument around 180°—the problem isn’t that our tone is so harsh, it’s that yours is so inappropriately soft towards people who lie to children, who want to gut our educational system, and who want to taint science with a bias for magic.”
– PZ Myers
Monday, October 3, 2011
These are the two most important posts of this blog.
Sunday, October 2, 2011
The Catholic religion requires all Catholic idiots to be science deniers.
The Catholic Position
What is the Catholic position concerning belief or unbelief in evolution? The question may never be finally settled, but there are definite parameters to what is acceptable Catholic belief.
Concerning cosmological evolution, the Church has infallibly defined that the universe was specially created out of nothing. Vatican I solemnly defined that everyone must "confess the world and all things which are contained in it, both spiritual and material, as regards their whole substance, have been produced by God from nothing" (Canons on God the Creator of All Things, canon 5).
The Church does not have an official position on whether the stars, nebulae, and planets we see today were created at that time or whether they developed over time (for example, in the aftermath of the Big Bang that modern cosmologists discuss). However, the Church would maintain that, if the stars and planets did develop over time, this still ultimately must be attributed to God and his plan, for Scripture records: "By the word of the Lord the heavens were made, and all their host [stars, nebulae, planets] by the breath of his mouth" (Ps. 33:6).
Concerning biological evolution, the Church does not have an official position on whether various life forms developed over the course of time. However, it says that, if they did develop, then they did so under the impetus and guidance of God, and their ultimate creation must be ascribed to him.
Concerning human evolution, the Church has a more definite teaching. It allows for the possibility that man’s body developed from previous biological forms, under God’s guidance, but it insists on the special creation of his soul. Pope Pius XII declared that "the teaching authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions . . . take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter—[but] the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God" (Pius XII, Humani Generis 36). So whether the human body was specially created or developed, we are required to hold as a matter of Catholic faith that the human soul is specially created; it did not evolve, and it is not inherited from our parents, as our bodies are.
While the Church permits belief in either special creation or developmental creation on certain questions, it in no circumstances permits belief in atheistic evolution.
Evolution is the fundamental concept underlying all of biology and is supported by multiple forms of scientific evidence.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Florida state standards spark nonscientific backlash
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION (102 posts)
My 12 best evidence for evolution posts
No other notion in any field of science has been as extensively tested and as thoroughly corroborated as the evolutionary origin of living organisms.
One teacher reported that students 'burst into tears' when told they would be studying evolution.
Saturday, October 1, 2011
Perhaps this is why most Americans know nothing about evolution. Almost 3 out of 4 American biology teachers are uneducated morons.
"The National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) strongly supports the position that evolution is a major unifying concept in science and should be included in the K–12 science education frameworks and curricula. Furthermore, if evolution is not taught, students will not achieve the level of scientific literacy they need. This position is consistent with that of the National Academies, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), and many other scientific and educational organizations.
"NSTA also recognizes that evolution has not been emphasized in science curricula in a manner commensurate to its importance because of official policies, intimidation of science teachers, the general public's misunderstanding of evolutionary theory, and a century of controversy. In addition, teachers are being pressured to introduce creationism, “creation science,” and other nonscientific views, which are intended to weaken or eliminate the teaching of evolution."
Intimidation of science teachers. What's that about? If you guessed Christian assholes are threatening America's biology teachers you are correct. I noticed our government's policy is to kill terrorists. Are not these Christian thugs who threaten America's teachers equal to terrorists? Of course the President of the United States isn't going to order our Armed Forces to hunt down and kill the Christian scum who are trying to destroy America's science education, but most certainly that's what these subhumans deserve.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
In his The Greatest Show on Earth, the Evidence for Evolution Richard Dawkins writes about the retarded cowardly Christian assholes of Idiot America.
The plight of many science teachers today is not less dire. When they attempt to expound the central and guiding principle of biology; when they honestly place the living world in its historical context -- which means evolution; when they explore and explain the very nature of life itself, they are harried and stymied, hassled and bullied, even threatened with loss of their jobs. At the very least their time is wasted at every turn. They are likely to receive menacing letters from parents, and have to endure the sarcastic smirks and close-folded arms of brainwashed children. They are supplied with state-approved textbooks that have had the word 'evolution' systematically expunged, or bowdlerized into 'change over time'.
In the same book Richard Dawkins writes about the cowardly crybaby wimpy Christian students who infest Idiot America's science classrooms.
In October 2008 a group of about sixty American high-school teachers met at the Center for Science Education of Emory University, in Atlanta. Some of the horror stories they had to tell deserve wide attention. One teacher reported that students 'burst into tears' when told they would be studying evolution. Another teacher described how students repeatedly screamed 'No!' when he began talking about evolution in class. Another reported that pupils demanded to know why they had to learn about evolution, given that it was 'only a theory'. Yet another teacher described how 'churches train students to come to school with specific questions to ask to sabotage my lessons'.
The professional and amateur science deniers who spread the usual lies about evolution are dishonorable.
Christian idiots are terrified of normal people.
The disgusting Bible might impress a gullible uneducated moron but normal people laugh at the idiocy of people who believe in the idiotic stories.
The magic god fairy's promises? The stupidity burns.
Being a normal person, also known as an atheist, is free. All a person has to do is stop being a gullible superstitious idiot.
The stinking Jeebus corpse rose from the dead, became a zombie, then flew up to the clouds? Christians are insane.
A ten year old girl tells her mother a biology textbook published by Bob Jones University is bullshit.
A ten year girl who loves science figured out her Bob Jones University science textbooks are full of bullshit and complained to her mother about it.
This is child abuse and the Christian scum at Bob Jones University who profit from their child abuse should be put in prison.
Top home-school texts dismiss evolution for creationism
LOUISVILLE, Kentucky — Home-school mom Susan Mule wishes she hadn't taken a friend's advice and tried a textbook from a popular Christian publisher for her 10-year-old's biology lessons.
Mule's precocious daughter Elizabeth excels at science and has been studying tarantulas since she was 5. But she watched Elizabeth's excitement turn to confusion when they reached the evolution section of the book from Apologia Educational Ministries, which disputed Charles Darwin's theory.
"I thought she was going to have a coronary," Mule said of her daughter, who is now 16 and taking college courses in Houston. "She's like, 'This is not true!"'
"I feel fairly strongly about this. These books are promulgating lies to kids," said Jerry Coyne, an ecology and evolution professor at the University of Chicago.
"If this is the way kids are home-schooled then they're being shortchanged, both rationally and in terms of biology," Coyne said. He argued that the books may steer students away from careers in biology or the study of the history of the earth.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But, as Lovan noted in his piece, “83 percent of home-schooling parents want to give their children ‘religious or moral instruction.’” I weep for those children. For many of them are simply being brainwashed by their parents. Yes, that’s what it is—brainwashing. For a parent to ignore 150 years of solid science, feeding their children lies based on theology, is to deprive those children of the wonder of the universe—a wonder based on truth rather than medieval superstition. It kills off the part of a child that most needs nurturing: her sense of wonder, and all the possibilities of life that are opened up by that wonder. How many budding biologists have been stifled by their parents’ willful ignorance of science, and on their insistence that the Bible is the real source of biological information? Generation after generation of ignorance and religious dogmatism, all perpetuated by religously based home-schooling.
-- Jerry Coyne
Friday, September 30, 2011
The stupidity burns at Bob Jones University.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
One of the greatest days in baseball history

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UPDATE 10/28/2011:
The Tampa Bay Rays were defeated by the Texas Rangers on the first round of the playoffs despite the first game which Tampa Bay won 9 to 0.
Last night I watched one of the most exciting come-from-behind victories in a World Series baseball game, game six between the Texas Rangers and the St Louis Cardinals. St Louis, like Tampa Bay, was unlikely to make it to the playoffs but they made it anyway, all the way to the World Series.
In game six last night St Louis had to win because they were behind 3 games to 2 games, and Texas could have won the World Series if they won last night. In this game in both the 9th and 10th innings they were just one strike away from elimination before they tied the game. Then in the bottom of the 11th inning St Louis hit a home run to tie the series 3 games to 3 games. I will watch the decidning game seven tonight. Here's a newspaper article about last night's game for the ages.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/10/28/sports/s135435D50.DTL&type=printable
Baseball buzzing about game for the ages
By RONALD BLUM, AP Sports Writer
Friday, October 28, 2011
(10-28) 13:54 PDT ST. LOUIS (AP) --
The greatest World Series game ever, or one of the greatest?
Fans were debating the head-scratching decisions, amateurish mix-ups and mighty clutch performances of Game 6 on Friday, eagerly rehashing a series of performances unmatched in the championship's 108-year history.
The St. Louis Cardinals were one strike from elimination not once but twice, rallying to beat the Texas Rangers 10-9 on David Freese's home run in the 11th inning Thursday night and force the World Series to a Game 7 for the first time since 2002.
"I'm sure someone already has invoked Dickens," said John Thorn, baseball's official historian. "It was the best of games. It was the worst of games. It's certainly in the top 10 among postseason games. It may be in the top five."
Where it ranks is a question of personal preference. But certainly it's part of a group that includes extra-inning finales in 1912 and 1924, Don Larsen's perfect game in 1956, Bill Mazeroski's Series-ending home run in Game 7 in 1960, Carlton Fisk's 12th-inning home run that won Game 6 in 1975, the Don Denkinger game in 1985, the Bill Buckner error that ended Game 6 in 1986, hobbling Kirk Gibson's home run in the 1988 opener, the Jack Morris 10-inning shutout in Game 7 in 1991 and Luis Gonzalez's winning single off Mariano Rivera in Game 7 in 2001.
The World Series that many thought wouldn't be worth watching turned into a classic.
"It's very, very high up there," broadcaster Bob Costas said. "There are other all-time great games that have been played well from top to bottom. Part of what made this compelling is the gaffes, following by heroics — by the same guys. There were debatable decisions by both sides, so many twists and turns. The word 'unbelievable' is constantly used in sports. This game actually beat the adjective 'unbelievable.'"
Perhaps it's easier to rank this among only games at the same stage of the Series.
"I think among Game 6s, I might take this one," Thorn said. "For excitement, I would say the closest to this would be Game 7 in 1960, where you had lead reversals, horrible blunders, sloppy play, wretched pitching in spots and great heroics capped by the walkoff homer."
Before Thursday night, a team had been one out from elimination and come back to win just twice in Series history. Then, improbably, it happened in both the ninth and 10th innings.
"Good pitching? No. Good baseball? No," Hall of Famer Reggie Jackson said. "But there were so many goods — leadership, character, never-say-die attitude. It certainly was a thriller."
Almost forgotten were the bumbles and stumbles earlier in the night, when the teams comically combined for five errors that led to four unearned runs. The Cardinals dropped a fly ball and a popup.
"In terms of a team failing, repeatedly and profoundly, on the elemental challenges — and then prevailing? I've never seen a team overcome itself like that," said baseball historian Keith Olbermann of Current TV. "In that sense it's the greatest 'comeback' in a potentially decisive game."
The 623rd World Series game truly was like no other in baseball's championship.
"What happened today, I just think it's — you had to be here to believe it," Cardinals manager Tony La Russa said.
For those who weren't there or watching, David Freese hit a tying, two-run triple with the Cardinals down to their last strike in the ninth inning, Lance Berkman hit a tying RBI single with the Cards down to their last strike in the 10th, and Freese homered to straightaway center leading off the 11th inning.
One day, there ought to be a movie.
Before Freese's triple, the Cardinals had just an 8.7 percent chance of winning, according to the sabermetric Web site Fansgraphs.com. After the hit, St. Louis's percentage increased to 62.4.
"Given the context of the situation, that pitch produced one of the largest changes in championship expectancy in the history of the sport," Fangraphs' Dave Cameron wrote.
Josh Hamilton's two-run, 10th-inning homer boosted the Rangers' chances of winning to 92.3 percent. The came Lance Berkman's two-out, two-strike tying single in the bottom half and Freese's home run.
"Freese's heroics in both the 9th and 11th innings are historically unmatched," Cameron wrote. "He posted the highest WPA (.969) of any position player in a postseason game in history," he said, referring to the statistic for Win Probability Added.
Ahead 3-2 in the Series and on the verge of the first title in the 51-year history of a franchise that started as the expansion Washington Senators, the Rangers wasted 1-0, 3-2 and 4-3 leads, the latter when Alexi Ogando walked Yadier Molina with the bases loaded in the sixth.
Consecutive homers by Adrian Beltre and Nelson Cruz against Lance Lynn, and Ian Kinsler's RBI single off Octavio Dotel built a 7-4 lead in the seventh, but Allen Craig hit his second homer of the Series in the eighth to cut the gap against Derek Holland.
Then in the ninth, Albert Pujols doubled off Pedro Feliz with one out against Neftali Feliz, Lance Berkman walked on four pitches and Craig took a called third strike. Down 1-2 in the count, Freese tripled, sending a 98 mph fastball over the glove of a leaping Cruz in front of the right-field wall as the record crowd of 47,325 at Busch Stadium cheered wildly.
"I just said, 'Heater,'" Freese recalled of his guess.
He was stranded when Molina flied out.
But quickly, the Rangers went back on top 9-7 when Elvis Andrus singled off Jason Motte with one out in the 10th and Josh Hamilton hit his first home run in 66 postseason at-bats.
"It's about time! That was my first thought. But you've got to finish the game off, and we didn't do that," Hamilton said. "I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. We're just going to do everything we can to prepare. Guys are already talking about it. We're ready for Game 7. Shake it off and come back tomorrow."
Who really believed that it wasn't over at that point?
"I understand it's not over till you get that last out," Texas manager Ron Washington said. "I was just sitting there praying we got that last out."
Singles by Daniel Descalso and Jon Jay off Darren Oliver started the second St. Louis comeback in the bottom half. But when Scott Feldman retired Theriot on a run-scoring grounder to third for the second out, the Rangers were one out away again.
Pujols was intentionally walked for the fifth time in the Series before Berkman fell behind 1-2, took a ball and then singled to center on a 93 mph cutter from Scott Feldman.
"I didn't quite get it in enough," Feldman said.
Mark Lowe fell behind Freese 3-0, then worked the count full. Lowe threw a changeup and Freese connected for his fifth postseason homer, a long drive that had half a dozen fans jumping from their seats onto the grass to grab it before the ball even landed.
"He got it," Lowe said. "Just bad location. It wasn't the wrong pitch at all in my mind."
The only other similar instances were these:
In 1911's Game 5 at the Polo Grounds, the New York Giants trailed the Philadelphia Athletics 3-1 in the ninth before Doc Crandall hit an RBI double and scored on Josh Devore's single. Fred Merkle — of Merkle's Boner fame in 1908 — won it with a sacrifice fly in the 10th, but the A's won the title the next day with a 13-2 win at Shibe Park.
Then in Game 6 in 1986 at Shea Stadium, the Mets trailed Boston 5-3 in the 10th inning and had two outs and none on before rallying on Ray Knight's RBI single, Bob Stanley's run-scoring wild pitch and Mookie Wilson's bouncer to first that went through Buckner's legs for a game-ending error. The Mets then rallied from a 3-0 deficit in Game 7 to win 8-5.
The only other tying hit with a team one out from elimination was in Game 6 in 1992, when Otis Nixon's ninth-inning single off Toronto's Tom Henke tied it 2-2. The Blue Jays went on to win 4-3 in 11 innings.
In more than a half-century as a player and broadcaster, Fox's Tim McCarver has seen some stirring performances. He puts Thursday's along the twin Yankees comebacks of 2001 — when Tino Martinez and Scott Brosius hit two-run, ninth-inning homers that tied Games 4 and 5, and New York went on to win both in extra innings. He also mentions the Morris and Gonzalez games.
"Last night's game is right there," he said. "You don't even have to be a baseball fan to get involved with the passions and feelings of last night's game."