Mr. Bloomberg thought he was doing the right thing but now he understands he was wrong. People make mistakes. I have made thousands of mistakes.
I predict Bloomberg will be our next president, and he will be the best president this country ever had.
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Opinion
Bloomberg Apologizes for Stop and Frisk at Just the Right Time
Money can’t buy the good will of a crucial Democratic constituency, black voters, ahead of likely presidential bid.
By Mara Gay
Ms. Gay is a member of the editorial board.
November 17, 2019
At a black church in New York on Sunday, Michael Bloomberg stood before the congregation and repented.
He said the police stops of millions of black and Latino men when he was mayor, a policy known as stop and frisk, were a mistake.
“Over time, I’ve come to understand something that I long struggled to admit to myself,” he said in the soaring sanctuary of the Christian Cultural Center, in East New York. The former mayor choked up, seemingly holding back tears. “I got something important wrong. I got something important really wrong. I didn’t understand back then, the full impact that stops were having on the black and Latino communities.”
The apology was a decade late for those who were humiliated, harassed and intimidated by the government that is supposed to serve them. It came just ahead of Mr. Bloomberg’s anticipated announcement that he will seek the Democratic nomination for president.
“We could and should have acted sooner, and acted faster, to cut the stops. I wish we had and I’m sorry that we didn’t,” he continued.
“I can’t change history,” he said. “I want you to know that I realize back then I was wrong, and I am sorry.”
Inside the church, the former mayor’s apology was met with warm applause. “Once you leave office, you get a chance to reflect on what you did. Amen?” the church’s pastor, the Rev. A.R. Bernard, asked his churchgoers. “Amen,” they replied.
But many may find the apology hard to accept under the circumstances. Mr. Bloomberg is on the precipice of joining the herd of Democrats running for president. The nomination may already be a long shot for Mr. Bloomberg this late in the game. Without the support of black voters, it could be an impossibility.
The mea culpa may show how seriously he’s considering a presidential run. He defiantly defended the policy even last year as he took more tentative steps toward a bid.
But those close to the former mayor insist that his conversion on stop and frisk is sincere. They say he has come to a conclusion that can be hard to reach for a stubborn 77-year-old billionaire: He was wrong.
As mayor, he showed little devotion to public opinion, pushing unpopular ideas like banning smoking in bars and restaurants and trying to limit the sale of large sodas. He faced scathing tabloid headlines after he jetted off to his house in Bermuda as a snowstorm bore down on the city, only to hurry back when it turned into a blizzard. Rather than retreat in the face of the outrage he sometimes caused, he seemed to relish it.
But now, stop and frisk is different.
In September 2009, 62 percent of black voters approved of Mr. Bloomberg’s job performance, while 30 percent disapproved. Over the next three years, the numbers of stops swelled to a peak of more than 685,000 in 2011, then subsided. By September 2013, as the mayor continued to defiantly defend the policy even in the face of growing evidence that it discriminated against minority New Yorkers, just 25 percent of the black voters approved of his job performance, while 63 percent disapproved, according to Quinnipiac University polls.
Sunday, he said that while he remained proud that gun violence had declined under his watch, stop and frisk had harmed innocent people and alienated minority communities.
“That erosion of trust bothered me — deeply,” he said. “It still bothers me. And I want to earn it back.”
Some close to the former mayor have pushed him to reverse course on the issue for years, agonizing not only over damage to the mayor’s legacy, but to New York.
But until now, Mr. Bloomberg stubbornly defended the policy anyway, saying it was saving black and Latino lives. As he approached the end of his three terms in office in 2013, he said ending the policy would mean that “people will needlessly die and we’ll all be responsible.” That’s similar to what he said only last year.
The data Mr. Bloomberg is so fond of ultimately showed otherwise. In 88 percent of the stops, there was no arrest. In 2013, a federal judge ruled that the administration’s use of the tactic was unconstitutional. Stops declined sharply in his final years in office, then plummeted under Mayor Bill de Blasio. But crime continued to fall.
Still, Mr. Bloomberg did not apologize.
By the time Mr. Bloomberg left office, New Yorkers had been stopped by the police more than five million times. An entire generation of black and Latino children had grown up accustomed to getting “tossed” by the police on their way home from school.
“You could see the simmering frustration and anger about what these young people felt,” said Geoffrey Canada, president of the Harlem Children’s Zone and a longtime supporter of Mr. Bloomberg.
“I thought this issue really undermined him particularly in the black community,” Mr. Canada said. “Why not just say, ‘I’m sorry, I shouldn’t have done it. We agreed on so much.’”
When the two men met for breakfast this summer, Mr. Canada said he brought up the issue, as usual, and Mr. Bloomberg surprised him. “He said, ‘You know, I’m going to really have to potentially rethink this,’” Mr. Canada recalled. The lure of the White House can make Americans do extraordinary things.
When Mr. Bloomberg became mayor in January of 2002, New York was a city of open wounds. Toxic ash from the World Trade Center attacks still lingered in the winter sky. The economy was in crisis, and New Yorkers were losing their jobs. The city’s deep tribalism was aflame, zealously lit up by his predecessor as mayor, Rudolph Giuliani.
Mr. Bloomberg wanted to heal those wounds. But on policing, as with other New York mayors, he lost his way. This Sunday, he finally asked black New Yorkers for their forgiveness. And their vote.
"Darwin was the first to use data from nature to convince people that evolution is true, and his idea of natural selection was truly novel. It testifies to his genius that the concept of natural theology, accepted by most educated Westerners before 1859, was vanquished within only a few years by a single five-hundred-page book. On the Origin of Species turned the mysteries of life's diversity from mythology into genuine science." -- Jerry Coyne
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.