Scientists work hard to figure out what's true and what's wrong. The wrong stuff gets thrown out.
Religions work hard to tell little gullible children what's true even though it's nonsense. Without this child abuse religions would go extinct.
Monday, July 31, 2017
Sunday, July 30, 2017
The cowardly idiots who believe in a magical 2nd life. The stupid, it burns. This moronic fantasy makes terrorism possible.
There is no magical 2nd life. Dead animals, including dead human apes, stay dead. This is called reality. All the wishful thinking in the world will not make reality go away.
If the childish heaven/hell fantasy was real, imagine the magic required to accomplish that. The Magic Jeebus Man would have to wave his magic wand constantly to make it work. The whole thing is too ridiculous to take seriously.
This is something I wrote about the morons who think their Magic Man listens to them talk to themselves. The stupid, it burns.
If I wanted to throw out all of reality and pretend a Magical Master of the Entire Universe was real (aka Zeus, Allah, God), I can't imagine why it would pay attention to the human apes on this insignificant planet in a universe of countless trillions of solar systems. Mr. God, if it was real, might not even notice we exist.
Of course the god fantasy is a ridiculous idea. It was useful to explain things thousands of years ago but we know things these days. We know a god fairy's magical powers were never necessary for anything. Even without all the science we have today the Mr. God thing was always a childish fantasy, equal to the Easter Bunny fantasy.
Praying is talking to yourself. In my opinion it's a mental illness.
Saturday, July 29, 2017
Muslims are scum.
"Palestinians invoke the name of Allah while celebrating the savage slaughter of a Jewish family at their dinner table. Apologists like to say that people who kill in the name of Islam 'aren't Muslim.' So, what about the people who praise and encourage killing in the name of Islam?"
This is a cut & paste job and also what I wrote. It's about the Magic Jeebus Man and the morons who believe this bullshit.
Did the gospels paint a prophet or a cult leader?
When i read the account of Christ and I read it as a myth that was meant to be examined as testimony I imagine that instead of reading a book Luke, John, or Matthew are at the bar just telling me a story about some guy they knew. This is what a testimony is after all: a story someone tells you. If a book is written in the format of a testimony thus you must not necessarily believe the narrator at all times. Sometimes you can assume that he is lying or exaggerating things just like a stranger telling you a story at a bar would. (Sorry for the long intro but it will help the rest of this make sense... hopefully) So following this logic and using its lens to examine the bible I make 3 assumptions as I read the accounts of Christs life. 1 - Jesus is not divine and has no special powers. (ex. I've never seen a dude walk on water why would I believe a testimony that says someone saw someone do it somewhere.) 2 - No one else has special powers everyone is a human limited by the knowledge and culture of Iron Age Middle East. 3 - Jesus is corruptible just like every other person. Now with all this in play as I go through the bible I hear a story about a Iron age Rabbi that ran an organization with lots of hall marks of a cult like abandoning families to follow a holy teacher, giving up wealth, and dedicating one entire life soul, body, and mind to the holy teacher. Further this holy teacher showed them a bunch of cheap parlor tricks. The holy teacher was so narcissistic and egocentric that anytime anything other then him comes up he tells you how unimportant it is compared to him and tells you to give up everything just to worship him and serve him. Further he is reckless and his delusions of grandeur like thinking he is himself a god as well as his corrupt nature like soaking himself in a years wages worth of perfume in one sitting in front of a bunch of people who gave everything up to obey and follow him. The picture is clear. I do not see a wise and loving guy. I see Jim Jones or Marshall Applewhite. Why do I get such a different idea then others when reading this book? What lens do you look through when interpreting the bible? My analysis lead me to make this documentary about the life of Christ where I go into detail and develop my thesis from birth to crucifixion. If you care for such a thing here is a link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6phUjAXqCT4 (Some parts of the documentary might be offensive so if you do not like being offended I suggest not opening the link.)
WHAT I WROTE:
Wow. Well done. What a difference between a normal person (aka atheist) like you and theists who believe any ridiculous nonsense that makes them feel good.
Will the Christians try to understand what you wrote or will they look for an excuse to continue wasting their life believing impossible magic tricks like walking on water or the magical resurrection of a decomposing corpse.
I betting they will continue to live in their magical fantasy land. Nobody cares. It's their problem. I just wish they wouldn't brainwash children and infect them with their disease.
When i read the account of Christ and I read it as a myth that was meant to be examined as testimony I imagine that instead of reading a book Luke, John, or Matthew are at the bar just telling me a story about some guy they knew. This is what a testimony is after all: a story someone tells you. If a book is written in the format of a testimony thus you must not necessarily believe the narrator at all times. Sometimes you can assume that he is lying or exaggerating things just like a stranger telling you a story at a bar would. (Sorry for the long intro but it will help the rest of this make sense... hopefully) So following this logic and using its lens to examine the bible I make 3 assumptions as I read the accounts of Christs life. 1 - Jesus is not divine and has no special powers. (ex. I've never seen a dude walk on water why would I believe a testimony that says someone saw someone do it somewhere.) 2 - No one else has special powers everyone is a human limited by the knowledge and culture of Iron Age Middle East. 3 - Jesus is corruptible just like every other person. Now with all this in play as I go through the bible I hear a story about a Iron age Rabbi that ran an organization with lots of hall marks of a cult like abandoning families to follow a holy teacher, giving up wealth, and dedicating one entire life soul, body, and mind to the holy teacher. Further this holy teacher showed them a bunch of cheap parlor tricks. The holy teacher was so narcissistic and egocentric that anytime anything other then him comes up he tells you how unimportant it is compared to him and tells you to give up everything just to worship him and serve him. Further he is reckless and his delusions of grandeur like thinking he is himself a god as well as his corrupt nature like soaking himself in a years wages worth of perfume in one sitting in front of a bunch of people who gave everything up to obey and follow him. The picture is clear. I do not see a wise and loving guy. I see Jim Jones or Marshall Applewhite. Why do I get such a different idea then others when reading this book? What lens do you look through when interpreting the bible? My analysis lead me to make this documentary about the life of Christ where I go into detail and develop my thesis from birth to crucifixion. If you care for such a thing here is a link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6phUjAXqCT4 (Some parts of the documentary might be offensive so if you do not like being offended I suggest not opening the link.)
WHAT I WROTE:
Wow. Well done. What a difference between a normal person (aka atheist) like you and theists who believe any ridiculous nonsense that makes them feel good.
Will the Christians try to understand what you wrote or will they look for an excuse to continue wasting their life believing impossible magic tricks like walking on water or the magical resurrection of a decomposing corpse.
I betting they will continue to live in their magical fantasy land. Nobody cares. It's their problem. I just wish they wouldn't brainwash children and infect them with their disease.
Christians brainwash children because they're fucking assholes. What I wrote at a Christian retard blog.
"Help them understand that they are connected with God’s Creation, and that God’s Creation is part of their family."
I don't belong here so throw me out if you want. I would like to point the obvious fact that you people brainwash children long before they're old enough to think for themselves. The reason you do this is because you know if you let them grow up first they will never believe your fantasies.
This is child abuse and it's wrong.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/ecopreacher/2017/04/welcoming-children-gods-creation/
I don't belong here so throw me out if you want. I would like to point the obvious fact that you people brainwash children long before they're old enough to think for themselves. The reason you do this is because you know if you let them grow up first they will never believe your fantasies.
This is child abuse and it's wrong.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/ecopreacher/2017/04/welcoming-children-gods-creation/
What I wrote at the Wall Street Journal: Religious brainwashing is child abuse.
the 6-year-old had drawn saying he was “thankful for Jesus”
This is typical. The brainwashing begins at a very young age when the victims are gullible and willing to believe any nonsense shoved into them. This is child abuse and there's no excuse for it.
This is typical. The brainwashing begins at a very young age when the victims are gullible and willing to believe any nonsense shoved into them. This is child abuse and there's no excuse for it.
What I wrote somewhere else about the disgusting ridiculous anti-science bullshit in the bible.
"The question is then asked, how is the current form of the Bible the word of God when things that go against science are mentioned within it?"
An idea I have. Either God is uneducated and not too bright or the Bible is not the word of God.
It's obvious to me the Bible is fiction and Mr. God had nothing to do with it. It's also obvious to me the god of the gaps has run out of hiding places therefore it's not real. This problem gets worse for God with every new scientific discovery. This human progress will never end. Meanwhile the god fantasy is permanently stuck in the Dark Ages.
I recommend "GOD, The Most Unpleasant Character In All Fiction" by Dan Barker who used to be a preacher man. He eventually grew up and threw out his childish religious fantasies. Now he accepts reality.
Atheism is an acceptance of reality. Theism is a denial of reality. Take your pick.
An idea I have. Either God is uneducated and not too bright or the Bible is not the word of God.
It's obvious to me the Bible is fiction and Mr. God had nothing to do with it. It's also obvious to me the god of the gaps has run out of hiding places therefore it's not real. This problem gets worse for God with every new scientific discovery. This human progress will never end. Meanwhile the god fantasy is permanently stuck in the Dark Ages.
I recommend "GOD, The Most Unpleasant Character In All Fiction" by Dan Barker who used to be a preacher man. He eventually grew up and threw out his childish religious fantasies. Now he accepts reality.
Atheism is an acceptance of reality. Theism is a denial of reality. Take your pick.
Friday, July 28, 2017
This is a copy and paste job. Lots of good information here about reality and the breathtaking stupidity of creationists.
AngelOfLight Heathen
Actually, light, in the form of photons of ultra-high energy gamma and X-Rays formed very soon after the Big Bang, so the Bible (accidentally) sort of got this one right. Visible light did not appear until much later, but long before the formation of the first stars. So light, as an electromagnetic wave, is self-perpetuating and doesn't actually require a source.
Did the Genesis writers have some special insight that we have only now discovered? Not really. If you watch a sunrise or sunset, you will notice that the sky begins to light up long before the Sun becomes visible. Similarly, the sky will remain in twilight for some time after the Sun sets. So, the ancient writers of Genesis didn't really connect 'light' with the Sun. Since they weren't aware that the planet was spherical, they didn't realize that the Sun would light up the sky long before it appeared over the horizon.
Some of the prevailing theories of abiogenesis posit that the first life-forms derived their energy from hydrothermal vents, so it is possible that life (in the form of very simple algae) could have existed without sunlight. But, of course, it was the evolution of photosynthesis that really kicked evolution into high gear, since there was now orders of magnitude more energy available to drive evolution from simple algae, to the first cells and then plants and finally animals. So yeah - Genesis really dropped the ball on that one.
The scientific problems with Genesis go far deeper, though. For one, what exactly is this "firmament" thing? Creationists will tell us that is it simply our atmosphere. This becomes a little problematic in verse 16, though, where we are told that God placed the Sun and Moon in the firmament. Clearly, the Sun is not inside our atmosphere, and neither is the Moon. Aha! says the Creationist. The "firmament" must be a reference to the Solar System as whole. Well, in that case, what are the "waters above the firmament"? It's here that the Christian mental gymnastics become Olympic contenders. Perhaps the "waters above" are a reference to the Oort cloud, a belt of icy comets that surrounds the edge of the Solar System. But - water and ice are not the same thing. If the Bible had meant "rocky debris containing large amounts of water ice", then why didn't is just say so?
Other will tell us that the "waters above" referred to a thick vapor canopy that surrounded the earth and collapsed upon the planet during the Great Flood. A little bit of physics will soon dispel that notion. Genesis says that the water covered the highest mountains, and yet it only rained for 40 days. The amount of energy released by a deluge of that magnitude would have dwarfed even the 100,000 megatons released by the K-t event, and vaporized the earth.
So, what is the firmament? Quite simply, it's exactly what Genesis says it is. It is a solid dome that god constructed and placed into the infinite, eternal ocean (called tehom in Hebrew) in order to create a living space for humans. The "waters above the firmament: were exactly that - the ancient, primeval tehom that surrounded the earth, held back by the solid firmament. which also housed the Sun, Moon and stars.
The ancient Hebrew conception of the Cosmos was very similar to that of the Babylonian/Sumerian creation myths, which should not come as a surprise, since we now know that the Israelites and the Canaanites shared a common Semitic ancestor, and are closely related, genetically. The fact that they originally shared a common religion should also come as no surprise.
Actually, light, in the form of photons of ultra-high energy gamma and X-Rays formed very soon after the Big Bang, so the Bible (accidentally) sort of got this one right. Visible light did not appear until much later, but long before the formation of the first stars. So light, as an electromagnetic wave, is self-perpetuating and doesn't actually require a source.
Did the Genesis writers have some special insight that we have only now discovered? Not really. If you watch a sunrise or sunset, you will notice that the sky begins to light up long before the Sun becomes visible. Similarly, the sky will remain in twilight for some time after the Sun sets. So, the ancient writers of Genesis didn't really connect 'light' with the Sun. Since they weren't aware that the planet was spherical, they didn't realize that the Sun would light up the sky long before it appeared over the horizon.
Some of the prevailing theories of abiogenesis posit that the first life-forms derived their energy from hydrothermal vents, so it is possible that life (in the form of very simple algae) could have existed without sunlight. But, of course, it was the evolution of photosynthesis that really kicked evolution into high gear, since there was now orders of magnitude more energy available to drive evolution from simple algae, to the first cells and then plants and finally animals. So yeah - Genesis really dropped the ball on that one.
The scientific problems with Genesis go far deeper, though. For one, what exactly is this "firmament" thing? Creationists will tell us that is it simply our atmosphere. This becomes a little problematic in verse 16, though, where we are told that God placed the Sun and Moon in the firmament. Clearly, the Sun is not inside our atmosphere, and neither is the Moon. Aha! says the Creationist. The "firmament" must be a reference to the Solar System as whole. Well, in that case, what are the "waters above the firmament"? It's here that the Christian mental gymnastics become Olympic contenders. Perhaps the "waters above" are a reference to the Oort cloud, a belt of icy comets that surrounds the edge of the Solar System. But - water and ice are not the same thing. If the Bible had meant "rocky debris containing large amounts of water ice", then why didn't is just say so?
Other will tell us that the "waters above" referred to a thick vapor canopy that surrounded the earth and collapsed upon the planet during the Great Flood. A little bit of physics will soon dispel that notion. Genesis says that the water covered the highest mountains, and yet it only rained for 40 days. The amount of energy released by a deluge of that magnitude would have dwarfed even the 100,000 megatons released by the K-t event, and vaporized the earth.
So, what is the firmament? Quite simply, it's exactly what Genesis says it is. It is a solid dome that god constructed and placed into the infinite, eternal ocean (called tehom in Hebrew) in order to create a living space for humans. The "waters above the firmament: were exactly that - the ancient, primeval tehom that surrounded the earth, held back by the solid firmament. which also housed the Sun, Moon and stars.
The ancient Hebrew conception of the Cosmos was very similar to that of the Babylonian/Sumerian creation myths, which should not come as a surprise, since we now know that the Israelites and the Canaanites shared a common Semitic ancestor, and are closely related, genetically. The fact that they originally shared a common religion should also come as no surprise.
My opinion of abortion doesn't matter because it's none of my fucking business. It's a private decision. Christian scum can't mind their own fucking business because they're stupid assholes.
Carl Sagan had a few things to say about it.
The Question of Abortion: A Search for Answers by Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan
The Question of Abortion: A Search for Answers by Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan
The bible is bullshit.
It would be so nice if Christians spent more time studying science and less time studying worthless holy books, aka fiction.
"The religious imagination is paltry and petty compared to the awesome reality."
-- PZ Myers, University of Minnesota biologist
"The religious imagination is paltry and petty compared to the awesome reality."
-- PZ Myers, University of Minnesota biologist
(Romans 3:23)--"for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God."
"Everyone has sinned."
This is just one of many examples of Christian stupidity. Normal people are always civilized. Normal people don't use idiotic religious words like "sin".
I never met a Christian who wasn't an idiot. I never met a Christian who wasn't a coward. Reality makes Christian morons cry.
Then of course there are the Muslim scum. I don't know what they are but they're not humans.
Thursday, July 27, 2017
Wednesday, July 26, 2017
At Reddit "Debate A Christian" I have to be extremely nice to morons or else they would throw me out. This is something I wrote for a Christian Creationist. He's a fucktard. Science makes him cry.
Hello ChristianConspirator. I'm sorry to bother you. I think creationists are very interesting because in America where I live there's millions of them. And in Muslim theocracies the creationists are virtually 100% of the population.
Also what is interesting is they're completely wrong about everything. Biologists know creationism is totally false. Besides being impossible the magical creation myth was thrown out in 1859 when Charles Darwin wrote On the Origin of Species. Almost two centuries later the evidence is more powerful than Mr. Darwin could have imagined possible.
But still you deny all this science. That's quite a feat.
I'm curious. Have you ever read a book about evolution that was written by a real biologist? In other words written by a scientist who isn't a science denier?
And if you did read this kind of book did you read it to understand it or did you read it to look for imaginary problems?
I'm betting you will ignore this suggestion but here it is: Read Why Evolution Is True by Jerry Coyne, a University of Chicago biologist. Virtually every paragraph is about another evidence for evolution. The book is easy to read and very interesting. It's not tedious like most science books. If you do read it which I doubt, please read it to understand it.
Again, sorry to bother you. Have a nice day.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAChristian/comments/6pc99r/why_discussing_verses_in_the_bible_with_a/
Also what is interesting is they're completely wrong about everything. Biologists know creationism is totally false. Besides being impossible the magical creation myth was thrown out in 1859 when Charles Darwin wrote On the Origin of Species. Almost two centuries later the evidence is more powerful than Mr. Darwin could have imagined possible.
But still you deny all this science. That's quite a feat.
I'm curious. Have you ever read a book about evolution that was written by a real biologist? In other words written by a scientist who isn't a science denier?
And if you did read this kind of book did you read it to understand it or did you read it to look for imaginary problems?
I'm betting you will ignore this suggestion but here it is: Read Why Evolution Is True by Jerry Coyne, a University of Chicago biologist. Virtually every paragraph is about another evidence for evolution. The book is easy to read and very interesting. It's not tedious like most science books. If you do read it which I doubt, please read it to understand it.
Again, sorry to bother you. Have a nice day.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAChristian/comments/6pc99r/why_discussing_verses_in_the_bible_with_a/
"You have to take life by the throat and shake it! You have to kick it in the stomach! You have to punch it in the eye!"
Excellent advice from Lucy. "You have to take life by the throat and shake it! You have to kick it in the stomach! You have to punch it in the eye!" Charles Schulz was brilliant.
The brains of human apes and dolphins are equally large and equally complex. Dolphins Beach Themselves To Feed - The Hunt - BBC Earth "These amazing Bottlenose Dolphins have adopted a unique way of hunting Fish. Taking advantage of the low tide, these super smart Mammals are able to beach themselves on mud banks, and attack in perfect synchrony."
Muslim scum are cowardly stupid fucking assholes.
List of Killings in the Name of Islam: Last 30 Days
During this time period, there were 134 Islamic attacks in 21 countries, in which 941 people were killed and 752 injured.
This is typical: Cowardly Muslim Assholes murder their own relative, a 12 year old girl.
Pakistan: A 12-year-old girl is honor killed by her family - as her village is put on notice and stands by.
If you're Muslim scum then get off my planet you stupid fucking asshole.
12-Year-Old Pakistani Girl Killed In Latest 'Honor Killing'. Hundreds of "honor killings" are reported in Pakistan every year.
During this time period, there were 134 Islamic attacks in 21 countries, in which 941 people were killed and 752 injured.
This is typical: Cowardly Muslim Assholes murder their own relative, a 12 year old girl.
Pakistan: A 12-year-old girl is honor killed by her family - as her village is put on notice and stands by.
If you're Muslim scum then get off my planet you stupid fucking asshole.
12-Year-Old Pakistani Girl Killed In Latest 'Honor Killing'. Hundreds of "honor killings" are reported in Pakistan every year.
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Some good news: Thousands of Muslims are throwing out the anti-science bullshit. They call themselves ex-Muslims and they're atheists, aka normal people.
Muslim scum, when they're not blowing themselves up, treat women like farm animals. Fortunately thousands of Muslims are throwing the Religion of Never Ending Violence in the garbage where it belongs.
Secularist conference features ‘largest gathering of ex-Muslims in history’
Secularist conference features ‘largest gathering of ex-Muslims in history’
The loving god is a stupid fucking asshole.
There are millions of Christians who actually believe the Noah's Ark genocide myth. Thousands of babies murdered by their loving god. These same Christians try to justify these atrocities. This is where Christians get their fake moral values. It's disgusting.
"why is he OK with condemning people to eternal suffering simply because they don't believe or choose not to follow a certain path in life?"
The loving god is a jealous god. If normal people, aka atheists, don't suck up to it then it tortures them forever after they drop dead. As if that was possible.
Of course the whole thing, every disgusting Christian fantasy, is just too ridiculous to take seriously. Believing in this stuff is a mental illness in my opinion.
Even worse Christians brainwash children to accept these fantasies as fact. This is child abuse and there's no excuse for it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAChristian/comments/6pjf9r/cmv_the_god_of_christianity_is_an_extremely_evil/?sort=new
"why is he OK with condemning people to eternal suffering simply because they don't believe or choose not to follow a certain path in life?"
The loving god is a jealous god. If normal people, aka atheists, don't suck up to it then it tortures them forever after they drop dead. As if that was possible.
Of course the whole thing, every disgusting Christian fantasy, is just too ridiculous to take seriously. Believing in this stuff is a mental illness in my opinion.
Even worse Christians brainwash children to accept these fantasies as fact. This is child abuse and there's no excuse for it.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAChristian/comments/6pjf9r/cmv_the_god_of_christianity_is_an_extremely_evil/?sort=new
New shark species glows in the dark, weighs about 2 pounds and has a huge nose.
Like finding a needle in a haystack, a team of scientists has discovered a new species of shark measuring less than a foot long and weighing under 2 pounds full-grown. This miniature, "glow-in-the-dark" shark is a member of the Lanternshark family (Squaliformes: Etmopteridae), which was serendipitously found 1,000 feet below the Pacific Ocean off the coast of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170725125618.htm
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170725125618.htm
This is a cut and paste job. It's about a Christian asshole who attacks science with his breathtaking stupidity. He works for the Christian Creationist Discovery Institute, aka Crackpot Central. Their goal is to dumb down science education in Idiot America to accommodate the bullshit in their ridiculous bible. This is a quote I saved a long time ago. The author is Mike Toreno (his internet name) and I don't know anything about him except that what he wrote was brilliant.
ID creationism is misrepresented by its adherents, not its critics.
The various statements of what ID creationism is are simply obfuscations of the following argument:
I don't understand the reason for X phenomenon. Therefore X phenomenon originated by magic.
For example, take the contention that the bacterial flagellum could not have originated through a step by step process. That's an obfuscation of the true argument, which is "I don't understand how the bacterial flagellum could have originated through a step by step process."
The response, of course, is: Well, maybe you not understanding something doesn't mean it can't be understood. There are other reasons why you might not understand something. Maybe you're just stupid.
Dembski gave some talk in Oklahoma, and he got totally pwned. He talked about the bacterial flagellum, and some guy in the audience, during the question and answer session, said, I can explain how the bacterial flagellum could have originated through a step by step process, and did it. Of course, then Dembski wanted more steps. No matter how many steps you present, the ID creationist wants more. This is a slight variation of the ID creationist argument, and reads as follows:
I won't admit that X phenomenon could have originated through natural means. Therefore, X phenomenon must have originated by magic.
And the answer, of course, is: Well, maybe you're just a liar.
The idea that proponents of ID creationism have been discriminated against is based on a misconception - namely, that every idea is of equal merit. ID creationists aren't able to gain acceptance for their ideas not because of philosophical resistance, discrimination, or conspiracy, but because their ideas are stupid. I mean, when a real scientist explains phenomena that an ID creationist says is unexplainable, is the ID creationist still entitled to a respectful hearing for his claim?
ID creationism adherents believe in ID creationism because they haven't considered, or don't want to consider, the possibility that they're just retarded. Well, it's time for them to consider it.
-- Mike Toreno
The various statements of what ID creationism is are simply obfuscations of the following argument:
I don't understand the reason for X phenomenon. Therefore X phenomenon originated by magic.
For example, take the contention that the bacterial flagellum could not have originated through a step by step process. That's an obfuscation of the true argument, which is "I don't understand how the bacterial flagellum could have originated through a step by step process."
The response, of course, is: Well, maybe you not understanding something doesn't mean it can't be understood. There are other reasons why you might not understand something. Maybe you're just stupid.
Dembski gave some talk in Oklahoma, and he got totally pwned. He talked about the bacterial flagellum, and some guy in the audience, during the question and answer session, said, I can explain how the bacterial flagellum could have originated through a step by step process, and did it. Of course, then Dembski wanted more steps. No matter how many steps you present, the ID creationist wants more. This is a slight variation of the ID creationist argument, and reads as follows:
I won't admit that X phenomenon could have originated through natural means. Therefore, X phenomenon must have originated by magic.
And the answer, of course, is: Well, maybe you're just a liar.
The idea that proponents of ID creationism have been discriminated against is based on a misconception - namely, that every idea is of equal merit. ID creationists aren't able to gain acceptance for their ideas not because of philosophical resistance, discrimination, or conspiracy, but because their ideas are stupid. I mean, when a real scientist explains phenomena that an ID creationist says is unexplainable, is the ID creationist still entitled to a respectful hearing for his claim?
ID creationism adherents believe in ID creationism because they haven't considered, or don't want to consider, the possibility that they're just retarded. Well, it's time for them to consider it.
-- Mike Toreno
I love chess endgames especially when I still have two bishops.
"Bishop vs Knight - Which one do you prefer?"
It depends on the position. If a knight finds a home deep in enemy territory that is a powerful knight.
In the endgame when the material is equal and when there are pawns on both sides of the board then 2 bishops should defeat a bishop & knight. I have won many games like this.
The bishops have the advantage in this endgame because they can get to the other side of the board in one move. However the knights are always dangerous. I use pawns to restrict the mobility of the knights.
When my opponent trades a bishop for my knight that's usually a good thing for me.
https://lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/bishop-vs-knight---which-one-do-you-prefer?page=3#24
It depends on the position. If a knight finds a home deep in enemy territory that is a powerful knight.
In the endgame when the material is equal and when there are pawns on both sides of the board then 2 bishops should defeat a bishop & knight. I have won many games like this.
The bishops have the advantage in this endgame because they can get to the other side of the board in one move. However the knights are always dangerous. I use pawns to restrict the mobility of the knights.
When my opponent trades a bishop for my knight that's usually a good thing for me.
https://lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/bishop-vs-knight---which-one-do-you-prefer?page=3#24
It's impossible to be more fucking stupid than a Christian retard. I write stuff. I wrote this. Here it is.
"they say the witnesses of Jesus are reliable sources"
Dead witnesses who may or may not have been invented are not evidence for anything. The ridiculous bible is not evidence for anything.
Fantastic claims (for example the magical resurrection of the magic jeebus man, imagine the smell) require fantastic evidence. The Christians have nothing but their wishful thinking and their breathtaking stupidity.
What I wrote at Reddit - Debate A Christian. I wrote about the breathtaking stupidity of evolution deniers. At this place I must pretend to be nice or get thrown out.
WHAT SOMEBODY ELSE WROTE:
WHAT I WROTE:
"Creation research" as if it's possible to research supernatural magic.
In America where I live there are countless millions of creationists. They want to throw out the foundation of biology, aka the strongest fact of science, aka evolution by natural selection. They disgrace my country.
They want to replace two centuries of scientific progress with the Genesis myth in the Bible. I don't understand why these people don't educate themselves. There's tons of stuff out there to study. How hard is it to look things up with Google search?
They refuse to study any evidence as explained by competent biologists. They get all their information about science (which is completely wrong and extremely dishonest) from professional liars who don't know what they're talking about.
Embryology, DNA sequencing, and several other branches of science all confirm the same thing. We share ancestors with all other life and we are most closely related to chimpanzee apes. They evolved from the same ancient apes we evolved from.
The four billion year history of life as explained by evolution is very interesting and it has the advantage of being true thanks to thousands of evidences more powerful than Charles Darwin could have imagined possible. The know-nothing creationists don't know what they're missing.
Fortunately there are Christians who accept the established truth of evolution. They unfortunately pollute evolution with supernatural magic but at least they don't deny the whole thing.
The creationists get one thing right. They say evolution threaten their beliefs. They're right about that. The religious implications of evolution can't be denied. Evolution by natural selection took away God's most important job.
Monday, July 24, 2017
Praying is talking to yourself. It's a mental illness. This is what someone else wrote about praying. This is a copy and paste job.
The true purpose of prayer is to make the people who pray feel better – it is a way of making believers feel they have exerted some degree of control over a situation that is beyond their control. Indeed, this is one of the major purposes of religion. Human beings have always been, and still are, at the mercy of a complex and often frightening world. It is only natural that people in such circumstances would be eager, even desperate, for a way to calm their fears and give themselves confidence, and this is what prayer provides. It gives believers a “direct line” to the highest power in the universe, the one whom they are told is on their side and will make sure everything turns out all right for them. This ability to cope has always been one of the major perceived benefits of religious belief, and atheists who seek to make inroads against theism would do well to remember it.
As long as believers picture atheism as a bleak existence bereft of meaning or hope, they will always reject it regardless of the arguments offered in its favor. If atheism is ever to spread and flourish, we must overcome these misperceptions and show that, on the contrary, it leads to empathy, purpose and positive action. The most insidious effect of prayer is that it encourages believers to remain passive in times of crisis, waiting for divine deliverance that will never come rather than taking effective action. Atheism, by contrast, teaches human beings to get up off their knees and begin living life. Rather than ask for all our wishes to be fulfilled, it is up to us to bring into existence the world that we want to live in. As the great agnostic orator Robert Green Ingersoll wrote, “The hands that help are holier than the lips that pray.”
Sunday, July 23, 2017
Before I closed this blog there were several dozen visitors a day. I recently made it available to the public again. Virtually nobody knows about it.
This blog was closed to the public for a very long time. I have recently made it available again. Virtually nobody knows about it these days. If you find this place please feel free to write a comment and please help advertise it. Many thanks.
Atheist liberals suck up to Muslim scum. This is what I wrote about them. I suggest click the link.
"While KPFA emphatically supports serious free speech, we do not support abusive speech."
When did telling the truth about Islam become abusive? Also why are atheist liberals in love with Islam? A real atheist would be willing to criticize all religions, especially anti-science cults like Islam.
Liberals love suppressing freedom of speech. That's why they invented the ridiculous word Islamophobia. The idea is if don't like terrorists you have a phobia. I suggest liberals are not too bright.
Saturday, July 22, 2017
Someone had a good idea and I wrote about it.
The question I'd ask is whether the truly righteous would even want to live again. Part of to be righteous is to be humble, to not covet new and shiny things.
Well done. It would be interesting to hear what a Christian has to say about it.
I think wishing for a magical 2nd life is being greedy. I'm grateful for the one life I have.
I like reality. If reality was thrown out so I can live again, I would not like that at all. A world of supernatural magic would be a terrible thing. Fortunately reality is what it is and it doesn't care if other people want to throw reality out. Reality isn't going anywhere. Therefore dead people stay dead and that's a good thing.
Atheism is an acceptance of reality. Theism is the acceptance of fantasy. Take your pick.
Somebody asked this question: "Could you hold your own in an evolution debate?" This was my reply.
"Could you hold your own in an evolution debate?"
I don't understand that. There is nothing to debate. Evolution is the strongest fact of science. Period.
If some brain-dead evolution denier wants to debate the established truth of evolution I just tell that person to grow up, educate himself, and face facts. It's pointless to explain science to a science denier for the same reason it's pointless to teach a dog how to play chess.
At least the dog won't repeatedly ask dumb questions without ever wanting to know the answer. Science deniers have an incurable mental illness. They are a waste of time. Stupid can't be fixed.
A bible thumping retard said he could go snow skiing after he drops dead. The extreme stupid burns. What I wrote for the childish moron. I'm suppose to be nice at this place so I can't tell the retard to grow up and face facts.
ski downhill
After you're dead you could go snow skiing. I think it's fair to say everything you wrote is wishful thinking and does not have one shred of real evidence.
I suggest it's better to focus on the one life you have instead of wishing for 2nd life which is totally impossible. The fantasy would require throwing out all of reality. With all due respect I suggest the magical heaven fantasy is very childish.
We are all lucking to be alive. I think wishing for a 2nd life is being greedy.
My two cents.
Idiot America's evolution deniers, the stupid, it burns.
WHAT THE CHRISTIAN RETARD WROTE:
Get serious and acknowledge that while Darwin was very smart and did his best to explain mankind, he could only offer hypotheses.
With so much written on how we got to where are today without God, let us breathlessly await the explanation of how undisciplined random processes produced the wonder, mystery and complexity of Homo sapiens.
------------------------------------------------------------
WHAT I WROTE:
Natural selection is not random. Please take your complaints to the molecular biologists at MIT. I have no time for science deniers.
------------------------------------------------------------
Get serious and acknowledge that while Darwin was very smart and did his best to explain mankind, he could only offer hypotheses.
With so much written on how we got to where are today without God, let us breathlessly await the explanation of how undisciplined random processes produced the wonder, mystery and complexity of Homo sapiens.
------------------------------------------------------------
WHAT I WROTE:
Natural selection is not random. Please take your complaints to the molecular biologists at MIT. I have no time for science deniers.
------------------------------------------------------------
Wall Street Journal: Less Unique Than We Think The idea that humans are special bumps up against Darwin’s great insight: the continuity of all life. David Barash reviews “The Creative Spark” by AgustÃn Fuentes and “Darwin’s Unfinished Symphony” by Kevin N. Laland.
------------------------------------------------------------
Another anti-science Christian asshole wrote this bullshit:
Darwin's work "The Origin of Species" doesn't explain the origin of species. There is no explanation of how species arise. Natural selection can only explain variations within a species. Reproduction only happens within a species. Dogs and cats cannot crossbreed with each other.
------------------------------------------------------------
No shirt Sherlock. Dogs and cats are on different branches of the tree of life. Everything else you wrote is bullshit. Typical know-nothing asshole for Jeebus.
------------------------------------------------------------
Another anti-science Christian asshole wrote this bullshit:
Darwin's work "The Origin of Species" doesn't explain the origin of species. There is no explanation of how species arise. Natural selection can only explain variations within a species. Reproduction only happens within a species. Dogs and cats cannot crossbreed with each other.
------------------------------------------------------------
No shirt Sherlock. Dogs and cats are on different branches of the tree of life. Everything else you wrote is bullshit. Typical know-nothing asshole for Jeebus.
------------------------------------------------------------
The Wall Street Journal subscribers are mostly Republican conservatives as am I. However there is nothing conservative about denying basic facts of science. Christian assholes have made the Republican Party a laughing stock and they have my contempt.
Friday, July 21, 2017
What someone else wrote at Reddit Debate A Christian and what I wrote.
Religion seems archaic and unnecessary, enlighten me as to why you follow it?
First off, I am not trying to say you beliefs are unworthy or not important, but religion seems pretty archaic. This applies to every religion, not just Christianity. With humanity advancing every decade, why do you still cling on to ancient human practices? It seems there is a steady increase in how we can explain natural phenomenons using evidence based theories and facts. In my opinion, humanity could be centuries more advanced if religion did not hinder progress. People used to think god caused illness, later is was proved to be caused by bacteria and viruses (germ theory). People used to think god caused earth quakes and tsunamis, this was later proved false with the theory of tectonic plates. People thought god made night and day/cosmic events, this was later explained using cosmology and People still believe god created people, but this is proved (although you may refute it) false with the theory of evolution. Why do you choose to following something with 0 real evidence vs something with actual proof? If 95 percent of engineers said your house is unstable, would you still live there? If 95 percent of doctors said you have cancer, would you believe them? If 95 percent of scientists say evolution is a fact, why would people still chose to still to not believe it?
Of course religion has done many good deeds for humanity, but overall, I think we would be much better off if we abandoned blind faith that was passed down from ancient people for modern logic and reason.
Again, not to put anyone down, I just do not see the value in believing in something that is borderline delusional (if someone came to you and said an all powerful entity was telling them things in their head- like every prophet- most people would think they are mentally ill) Enlighten me to your reasons for believing in something with no proof other than "just because".
--------------------------------------------
WHAT I WROTE:
"enlighten me as to why you follow it?"
I'm betting the magical 2nd life has something to do with it.
I'm satisfied with one life. I don't wish for anything more. For some reason religious people have to have a 2nd life. I don't understand why. And of course it's impossible.
"If 95 percent of scientists say evolution is a fact"
It would be more accurate to say 100% of competent biologists would call evolution a very strong fact supported by thousands of powerful evidence. They all agree we have a close evolutionary relationship with chimpanzee apes. Virtually every real biologist, including the rare competent religious biologists, agree God had nothing to do with it. Evolution by natural selection is a natural process. Supernatural magic is not required.
Christians should realize if the development of new species never required God then there is no reason to pretend God was required for anything else. My point is evolution has killed the idea there is a magical being in this universe.
What you wrote is excellent. Well done.
First off, I am not trying to say you beliefs are unworthy or not important, but religion seems pretty archaic. This applies to every religion, not just Christianity. With humanity advancing every decade, why do you still cling on to ancient human practices? It seems there is a steady increase in how we can explain natural phenomenons using evidence based theories and facts. In my opinion, humanity could be centuries more advanced if religion did not hinder progress. People used to think god caused illness, later is was proved to be caused by bacteria and viruses (germ theory). People used to think god caused earth quakes and tsunamis, this was later proved false with the theory of tectonic plates. People thought god made night and day/cosmic events, this was later explained using cosmology and People still believe god created people, but this is proved (although you may refute it) false with the theory of evolution. Why do you choose to following something with 0 real evidence vs something with actual proof? If 95 percent of engineers said your house is unstable, would you still live there? If 95 percent of doctors said you have cancer, would you believe them? If 95 percent of scientists say evolution is a fact, why would people still chose to still to not believe it?
Of course religion has done many good deeds for humanity, but overall, I think we would be much better off if we abandoned blind faith that was passed down from ancient people for modern logic and reason.
Again, not to put anyone down, I just do not see the value in believing in something that is borderline delusional (if someone came to you and said an all powerful entity was telling them things in their head- like every prophet- most people would think they are mentally ill) Enlighten me to your reasons for believing in something with no proof other than "just because".
--------------------------------------------
WHAT I WROTE:
"enlighten me as to why you follow it?"
I'm betting the magical 2nd life has something to do with it.
I'm satisfied with one life. I don't wish for anything more. For some reason religious people have to have a 2nd life. I don't understand why. And of course it's impossible.
"If 95 percent of scientists say evolution is a fact"
It would be more accurate to say 100% of competent biologists would call evolution a very strong fact supported by thousands of powerful evidence. They all agree we have a close evolutionary relationship with chimpanzee apes. Virtually every real biologist, including the rare competent religious biologists, agree God had nothing to do with it. Evolution by natural selection is a natural process. Supernatural magic is not required.
Christians should realize if the development of new species never required God then there is no reason to pretend God was required for anything else. My point is evolution has killed the idea there is a magical being in this universe.
What you wrote is excellent. Well done.
What somebody from the UK wrote about the disgusting expensive chess.com and the totally free and excellent lichess.org.
People there will pay £80 a year for what? What do you actually get for your money?
1. Unlimited tactics - get them here or chesstempo for free.
2. Lessons - That don't help you improve
3. Videos - This is a good feature but they only allow it for diamond members.
4. Access to databases that you get for free on other sites.
My main problem with chess.com is their tier system of membership. Even if you support the site financially they still restrict your use depending on your membership level. A gold member for example is limited to 25 tactics a day. A platinum member gets unlimited but only 10 lessons a day and no access to videos. The biggest scam though is limiting game analysis. Something that costs chess.com nothing as they use Stockfish.
Any mention of lichess on their site gets deleted immediately. Apparently Eric says mention of the site is ok but comparisons are not allowed. The mods have clearly not got that memo.
I was a diamond member for months. I wish I had found this site sooner. I can't donate too much a month to this site just now but when I can I will definitely be paying more.
1. Unlimited tactics - get them here or chesstempo for free.
2. Lessons - That don't help you improve
3. Videos - This is a good feature but they only allow it for diamond members.
4. Access to databases that you get for free on other sites.
My main problem with chess.com is their tier system of membership. Even if you support the site financially they still restrict your use depending on your membership level. A gold member for example is limited to 25 tactics a day. A platinum member gets unlimited but only 10 lessons a day and no access to videos. The biggest scam though is limiting game analysis. Something that costs chess.com nothing as they use Stockfish.
Any mention of lichess on their site gets deleted immediately. Apparently Eric says mention of the site is ok but comparisons are not allowed. The mods have clearly not got that memo.
I was a diamond member for months. I wish I had found this site sooner. I can't donate too much a month to this site just now but when I can I will definitely be paying more.
A Muslim asshole (they're all assholes) gave me a hard time about something I wrote. Here is my reply.
I know everything I need to know about Islam, the world's largest terrorist organization. Even the "moderate" Muslims treat women like farm animals. They're all evolution deniers. It's one of the most idiotic religious cults ever invented.
You read this mister: "Infidel" by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. She has to have bodyguards with her for the rest of her life because your disgusting religion of peace wants to kill her.
My comment is "waiting to be approved by Middleeasteye" which has a long history of censorship.
Thursday, July 20, 2017
The breathtaking stupidity of the Catholic Death Cult.
"The Vatican has fast-tracked Hamel’s path to sainthood, and Francis has already declared him 'blessed,' the first step in the canonization process."
The next step is inventing a miracle and then pretending the miracle was real.
The next step is inventing a miracle and then pretending the miracle was real.
What somebody wrote at today's Calvin & Hobbes
It is always so very sad to see how LARGE and VOCAL the anti-science attitudes are in the population. Global warming is very, very well supported from a myriad of scientific studies and research reports. The same is true for ideas of evolution. The largest preponderance of studies and reports supports the tenets of evolutionary theory.
The population that is so virulently anti-science has an unfortunate lack of understanding of the science process…. namely that nothing is ever proven 100% in science. It is a concept of thinking that is based upon probabilities. When 95+% of research studies provide statistically relevant data in support of a particular question, it is considered extremely well supported.
This was my reply:
Well done what you wrote. America is infested with science deniers. Evolution and global warming makes them cry.
Wednesday, July 19, 2017
There are Muslim scum but thank goodness there are ex-Muslims, millions of them.
ExMuslim TV
"Am I an Islamophobe? Or isn't Islam freedomophobe?"
Rasheed, Moroccan #ExMuslim
"This is my first time saying it in public: I am an ExMuslim. Not covering up my face could get me killed."
"Am I an Islamophobe? Or isn't Islam freedomophobe?"
Rasheed, Moroccan #ExMuslim
"This is my first time saying it in public: I am an ExMuslim. Not covering up my face could get me killed."
Atheist wimps have my contempt.
"I've had atheists make this case to me that they are not making a claim"
Those atheists are wimps. The wimps are part of the religious stupidity problem and they have my contempt. This website, by the way, is infested with atheist wimps. It's disgusting. They need to grow up.
I make this claim: Magic is not real therefore magic god fairies are impossible. Period.
Atheism is an acceptance of reality. Theism is a denial of reality.
Take your pick.
One more thing.
This is an example of the wimps who write comments here: "I'm an atheist because I haven't yet found any good reason/argument/evidence to believe that any gods exist."
FFS how difficult is it to say "I'm 100% certain there are no gods because it's the most ridiculous and most childish fantasy ever invented."
Come on people. Grow up FFS.
Here's another wimp: "We're claiming there's no credible evidence for the existence of any gods."
Wimps should speak for themselves.
There is no evidence for the Magic Man. I get that. But it's wimpy to say that when this is more accurate: There are no god fairies for the same reason there are no Easter Bunnies. It's a bullshit fantasy for feeble-minded cowards.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAnAtheist/comments/6o5ng4/the_claims_of_atheism/?sort=new
Those atheists are wimps. The wimps are part of the religious stupidity problem and they have my contempt. This website, by the way, is infested with atheist wimps. It's disgusting. They need to grow up.
I make this claim: Magic is not real therefore magic god fairies are impossible. Period.
Atheism is an acceptance of reality. Theism is a denial of reality.
Take your pick.
One more thing.
This is an example of the wimps who write comments here: "I'm an atheist because I haven't yet found any good reason/argument/evidence to believe that any gods exist."
FFS how difficult is it to say "I'm 100% certain there are no gods because it's the most ridiculous and most childish fantasy ever invented."
Come on people. Grow up FFS.
Here's another wimp: "We're claiming there's no credible evidence for the existence of any gods."
Wimps should speak for themselves.
There is no evidence for the Magic Man. I get that. But it's wimpy to say that when this is more accurate: There are no god fairies for the same reason there are no Easter Bunnies. It's a bullshit fantasy for feeble-minded cowards.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAnAtheist/comments/6o5ng4/the_claims_of_atheism/?sort=new
Tuesday, July 18, 2017
Monday, July 17, 2017
An ex-Muslim talks about his religion-tormented childhood; his terror of hell; his attempted suicide; his path of agony, to reach at last the relief of atheism.
“The only way to reform Islam is to get rid of Islam.”
http://theatheistconservative.com/2017/07/17/a-path-of-agony/ TWO EXCELLENT VIDEOS.
http://www.thethinkingatheist.com
WHAT I WROTE AT ATHEIST CONSERVATIVE:
http://theatheistconservative.com/2017/07/17/a-path-of-agony/ TWO EXCELLENT VIDEOS.
http://www.thethinkingatheist.com
WHAT I WROTE AT ATHEIST CONSERVATIVE:
“The only way to reform Islam is to get rid of Islam.”
This has been obvious to me a long time. At another website I wrote "If moderate Muslims had any sense of decency they would throw their disgusting cult out."
Numerous liberal atheists cried like babies. The harassment was intense, never ending, and very stupid. I call these people atheist wimps. I don't know what's wrong with them but their disease is incurable.
At Reddit I asked Christians a question about evolution. I expect my answer will be ignored. We will see what happens.
Some Christians deny the established truth of evolution. Other Christians accept our evolutionary relationship with the other ape species but they always invoke God to invent or use or guide evolution even though natural processes do not require a god for anything.
My question is are there any Christians who accept the overwhelming evidence for evolution without sticking God into it?
Virtually all biologists agree God had nothing to do with the evolution of new species. They agree evolution did not require an inventor and evolution does not require a user, and of course God is not a mechanism of evolution. Natural selection guides evolution, not some god.
Are there any Christians who agree with the biologists?
Many thanks.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAChristian/comments/6ntn3s/weekly_ask_a_christian_july_17_2017/?sort=old
My question is are there any Christians who accept the overwhelming evidence for evolution without sticking God into it?
Virtually all biologists agree God had nothing to do with the evolution of new species. They agree evolution did not require an inventor and evolution does not require a user, and of course God is not a mechanism of evolution. Natural selection guides evolution, not some god.
Are there any Christians who agree with the biologists?
Many thanks.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAChristian/comments/6ntn3s/weekly_ask_a_christian_july_17_2017/?sort=old
A Christian replied:
To say virtually all biologists say God had nothing to do with it is a bit outlandish and I would need a source. I know several biologists personally who do believe that, and I've even read several papers by atheist biologists on the subject of evolution, where they conclude that evolution to have begun is seemingly impossible, but it must have happened because we're here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fucktard knows some extremely stupid biologists.
I wrote this reply. I am required to be nice at this place. I can't tell a Christian moron he's a moron.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for your answer. Usually I'm ignored.
You answered my question. You do not agree with my idea (and virtually all biologists. Notice the word "virtually") that evolution is a completely natural process. Therefore God is required for something, for example how it began. You are invoking your god of the gaps. Fine with me.
Competent scientists don't do that by the way. Their job is to find out what really happened. They know it's wrong to give up and invoke supernatural magic.
Some day a Christian might admit evolution does not require Mr. God's magical powers but I doubt it. The religious implications of evolution are too great and so God must be sticked in there somewhere.
Thanks again for your answer.
To say virtually all biologists say God had nothing to do with it is a bit outlandish and I would need a source. I know several biologists personally who do believe that, and I've even read several papers by atheist biologists on the subject of evolution, where they conclude that evolution to have begun is seemingly impossible, but it must have happened because we're here.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fucktard knows some extremely stupid biologists.
I wrote this reply. I am required to be nice at this place. I can't tell a Christian moron he's a moron.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for your answer. Usually I'm ignored.
You answered my question. You do not agree with my idea (and virtually all biologists. Notice the word "virtually") that evolution is a completely natural process. Therefore God is required for something, for example how it began. You are invoking your god of the gaps. Fine with me.
Competent scientists don't do that by the way. Their job is to find out what really happened. They know it's wrong to give up and invoke supernatural magic.
Some day a Christian might admit evolution does not require Mr. God's magical powers but I doubt it. The religious implications of evolution are too great and so God must be sticked in there somewhere.
Thanks again for your answer.
Sunday, July 16, 2017
Christianity is bullshit. The Magic Man is bullshit.
Christianity is totally ridiculous because it completely depends on the magical resurrection of a decomposing corpse. Besides being disgusting this fantasy is just plain impossible. Christianity is completely wrong about everything and it must be thrown out.
There are two reasons why the god fantasy needs to be thrown out.
- The god of the gaps has run out of hiding places thanks to scientific progress that will never end. A god fairy who never had anything to do is a fairy that doesn't exist.
- The idea there a magical being watching over us (or doing who knows what) is obviously a childish fantasy, equal to the Easter Bunny fantasy. Magic is not real therefore magic god fairies and magic rabbits are impossible.
What an atheist asked Christians. Even though I don't have the Christian disease I answered some of the questions.
"Since I could take anything, true or false, based on faith or presupposing it, it can't be a reasonable pathway to truth or god."
A big part of religious brainwashing (aka child abuse) is this idea repeated thousands of times: "You must have faith."
In other words you must believe any idiotic fantasy that makes you feel good even if it has not one shred of evidence.
A biologist at the University of Minnesota had something to say about faith:
"No one word personifies the absolute worst and most wicked properties of religion better than that. Faith is mind-rot. It’s the poison that destroys critical thinking, undermines evidence, and leads people into lives dedicated to absurdity. It’s a parasite regarded as a virtue." -- PZ Myers
"Religion is the antithesis of science, an anesthetic for the mind that disables critical thought and encourages the acceptance of inanity as fact, and wishful thinking as evidence." -- PZ Myers
"Without god there is no morality."
That's ridiculous because I never met a Christian who had any moral values.
Normal people, aka atheists, have a brain so they can figure things out. It's everyone's best interest to be civilized. I don't need a magic god fairy to figure that out. This is not rocket science.
"God is revealing himself to you. You just aren't looking/are denying him."
The only possible explanation for this idea is brain damage.
It's impossible to be more fucking stupid than America's cowardly Christian retards. What I wrote for one those stupid fucking assholes for Jeebus.
i think it is general Christian doctrine that all people are sinners, thus all people are not good, and therefore all people need salvation.
"i think it is general Christian doctrine that all people are sinners, thus all people are not good, and therefore all people need salvation."
"Sinners" is a religious word. Normal people don't use it. The idea that all people are not good is ridiculous. The vast majority of us human apes are civilized and help other people every chance they get.
The salvation thing is ridiculous. Dead people stay dead. They don't have a magical soul that magically flies to a magical paradise where cowards can have a magical 2nd life. Besides being childish this fantasy is completely impossible. Magic is not real. Wishful thinking does not make reality go away.
The choice is accept reality or have a cowardly fear of reality. Take your pick.
I would rather not waste the rest of my life being a coward who can't exist without the moronic 2nd life fantasy.
More burning stupid from Idiot America. This is typical. A religious fucktard thinks normal people, aka atheists, are required to disprove the magic god fairy's magical powers. What I wrote for fucking moron:
"However the number of atheists who will claim no god and refuse to defend that position is huge."
Atheism is an acceptance of reality. Reality does not need to be defended.
The Magic Man is your fantasy. It's not our job to disprove your invisible friend. It's your job to provide evidence for it. Of course you have nothing but your wishful thinking and it's obvious you know virtually nothing about science which has repeatedly shown your fairy's magic wand was never necessary for anything.
You theists have no idea how childish and idiotic your magic god fairy is. Hint: Your fairy is equal the Easter Bunny. That's how childish and moronic and ridiculous your fantasy is.
Theism is a denial of reality. It's for feeble-minded cowards.
In a world of never ending religious violence, religious brainwashing, and religious stupidity, it's immoral to believe in god bullshit.
Saturday, July 15, 2017
There is a lot of burning stupid in Idiot America. A Christian Fucktard wrote about the magical resurrection of the Magic Jeebus Man: "I have no reason to doubt him." This is what I wrote.
I have no reason to doubt him.
Except for the obvious fact that dead witnesses are not evidence for anything. Also the Bible is not evidence for anything.
A magical resurrection of a decomposing corpse is impossible therefore it never happened. The vast majority of people on this planet agree. It never happened.
Believing in anti-reality nonsense that has zero real evidence is ridiculous. You're wasting your life being completely wrong about everything. Perhaps you don't care because your disgusting fantasy makes you feel good.
I discovered a very interesting website: "God is imaginary"
https://godisimaginary.com/index.htm
Proof #18 - Imagine heaven
How will we change the world, so that it becomes rational rather than religious?
--------------------------------------------------
This blog was closed to the public for a very long time. Now anyone can see it and comments are allowed. This blog was very popular. Unfortunately today nobody knows about this place being available.
If you find this place I suggest look at the old stuff which is more interesting than the new stuff. Please leave a comment anywhere so I know someone was here.
--------------------------------------------------
This is an excellent blog: https://lutherwasnotbornagaincom.wordpress.com/blog/
Proof #18 - Imagine heaven
How will we change the world, so that it becomes rational rather than religious?
--------------------------------------------------
This blog was closed to the public for a very long time. Now anyone can see it and comments are allowed. This blog was very popular. Unfortunately today nobody knows about this place being available.
If you find this place I suggest look at the old stuff which is more interesting than the new stuff. Please leave a comment anywhere so I know someone was here.
--------------------------------------------------
This is an excellent blog: https://lutherwasnotbornagaincom.wordpress.com/blog/
In Idiot America millions of morons read the moronic bible and nothing else. The stupid, it burns.
We know Genesis is a childish fantasy for science deniers. There is no reason to pretend the rest of the disgusting idiotic bible has any value.
"If anything is absolutely, rock-bottom true, it’s that life evolved, beginning about 4 billion years ago, and that the creation myth of Genesis is completely wrong." -- Jerry Coyne, University of Chicago biologist
The word of the Magic Man? That's ridiculous. If the god fairy wrote this gibberish then the fairy is an idiot, an idiot who loves genocide.
In a vast universe of countless trillions of solar systems the magical master of the whole thing is going to write or inspire the most idiotic book ever written for this tiny insignificant planet in the middle of nowhere. Some people will believe any moronic nonsense that makes them feel good.
Friday, July 14, 2017
Christian scum have the moral values of a terrorist.
An interesting fact. While Charles Darwin spoke out strongly against slavery American Christians invoked their Bible to justify slavery.
An interesting thing I noticed: Christians have no moral values at all. When they're not defending slavery they're sticking their nose into other people's private lives, they're brainwashing children (and other people's children when they can get away with it), they have zero respect for the Establishment Clause of the United States Bill of Rights, they're constantly telling biology teachers how to do their jobs because they don't like evolution, they have no problem with destroying the environment and other species if it's lucrative to do that, and they like to threaten people ("my loving god will torture you forever").
A book I'm reading: "The Dark Side Of Christian History" by Helen Ellerbe.
What I wrote for a bible thumping moron who believes the decomposing corpse of the Magic Jeebus Man magically became a zombie (or whatever these idiots think it is).
I'm impressed by your knowledge of what you read in the Bible. However there is a reason the vast majority of people on this planet don't believe it. That reason is very simple. Decomposing corpses do not "rise from the dead". It's impossible.
This is called reality. Reality can't be thrown out. Therefore Christianity must be thrown out because it's totally wrong.
--------------------------------------------------
The stupid. It burns.
--------------------------------------------------
THIS IS WHAT THE RETARD WROTE BEFORE I WROTE MY COMMENT:
--------------------------------------------------
THIS IS WHAT THE RETARD WROTE BEFORE I WROTE MY COMMENT:
Accounts prove no author corroboration or hoax
The distinction of account affirms no corroboration or copying of information by the multiple authors. This strongly opposes the idea of planned deception or hoax on the part of the followers of christ.
Yet they all attest to recognize Christ's resurrection as the chief cornerstone of all that Christianity claims to be.
What then appear to be the suggested problems with aligning the sequencing of these accounts?
Two of the account offer allotted margin by virtue of their uniqueness of location and apparent time spend covered.
One is Luke's Emmaus appearance and following events. The road appearance is accounted as distinct and separate from the tomb sequences. The appearance happens with two on the road, v.24:13-15; Jesus eats with them, v.30; they returned to Jerusalem and find the eleven. v.33.
Second is Paul's account. This presents Jesus' appearances over an apparent longer period of time than do the Gospel accounts. The use of the word 'then' in the first phrase of 1 Cor. 15:5, as if to imply 'next' is the particle 'eita' which means either 'then' or ' furthermore'. The next word translated 'then', v.6, 'epeita' means 'thereafter', 'After that the He appeared to more than 500 brethren . . . then He appeared to James, then to all the Apostles . . .and last of all to Paul. v.5-8
There are clues given relating to a range of time Paul's accounts may cover. One detail is his reference to James and all the apostles. Here he does not refer to them as Jesus' disciples.
This suggests a time frame in which at least the eleven, including James, had become known as the Apostles of Jesus not simply as His disciples. This would suggest a post-Pentecost identity. v.6,7.
By contrast, the prior verse imply pre-Pentecost appearances v.5, since it refers to the group as disciples Cephas and the twelve, and not as Apostles in v.6-7.
These and other distinctions suggest that Paul's accounts are spread over a longer period of time than just the pre-Pentecost appearances in the Gospels.
We now come to the accounts of Matthew and John. Both begin by listing two women, or a woman, and next the eleven disciples.
The matthew account reveals Mary Magdalene and another Mary at the tomb. Then Jesus appeared to them and has them carry a message to the disciples to leave for Galilee and they would see Him there. (mt. 28:10) This correlates with the later John 21 sitting of Jesus in Galilee. It also strongly suggests a direct prediction in the Matthew's account of a sitting on a mountain in Galilee, mt. 28:16-20.
By comparison, John's account specifies Mary Magdalene only at the tomb. This account could well have mentioned only Mary M. out of the two women who visits the tomb in Matthew. Then Jesus' appears to the eleven as found in both Matt, and John.
This leaves the appearance of Jesus in the John 20 sequence; M. Magdalene early at tomb still dark v.1; ran, to Peter and disciples, v.2; Peter and (John) run to tomb, v.4; The disciples go back ('to own homes'. not in Greek text) Jerusalem implied; v.10; Jesus appears to disciples in locked room, v.19; thomas absent, v.24; 8 days later Jesus appears again in the room, v.26; then the Galilean appearances, 20:1-23.
It is apparent the account in John offers much more detail about the events in and around Jerusalem and in Galilee then any of the other accounts.
The accounts, however, show no glaring discrepancies in its general conveyances nor contradictions in the sequence of geographic relocations that take place between Jerusalem and Galilee.
Therefore, it appears that the flow of information in the Gospel accounts resonate well within the context of events surrounding the resurrection. As could be expected, some give more detail than others.
The Pauline account appears to apply to a broader period of time as the context and terms used for 'Jesus' followers suggest.
Furthermore, even Jesus' most ferocious enemies, whose headquarters were in Jerusalem, could not produce a corpse that was beaten, crucified and mutilated enough to even be faked to pass for the body of Jesus.
Be assured, they would have payed far more than the thirty pieces of silver offered for the capture of His living body to have been handed the remains of His dead body. To their greatest dismay, this never happened.
Thursday, July 13, 2017
Typical Muslim scum: A woman's brother murdered her because she dressed like a real woman instead of wearing a black tent.
If you're a Muslim get off my planet you stupid fucking retard.
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/jul/18/dishonourable-killing-qandeel-baloch-pakistan-social-media-brother
"Pakistani police say the brother of killed model Qandeel Baloch has confessed to strangling her to death for 'family honour' because she posted 'shameful' pictures on Facebook."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/17/qandeel-baloch-brother-admits-killing-her-say-pakistani-police
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/jul/18/dishonourable-killing-qandeel-baloch-pakistan-social-media-brother
"Pakistani police say the brother of killed model Qandeel Baloch has confessed to strangling her to death for 'family honour' because she posted 'shameful' pictures on Facebook."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jul/17/qandeel-baloch-brother-admits-killing-her-say-pakistani-police
The decomposing corpse of the Magic Jeebus Man did not magically resurrect itself. What I wrote about Christian retards at Reddit.
Dead witnesses are not evidence for anything.
The magical resurrection of a decomposing corpse never happened because it's impossible. This is call "reality". Christians for some reason don't like reality so they threw reality out.
Unfortunately for Christians reality doesn't care what they think. Reality is what it is and nothing can change it including wishful thinking.
Christianity is completely wrong about everything and it must be thrown out.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAChristian/comments/6n1zox/the_resurrection_appearance_reports_are/?sort=new
There is a lot of fucking stupid in Idiot America.
The magical resurrection of a decomposing corpse never happened because it's impossible. This is call "reality". Christians for some reason don't like reality so they threw reality out.
Unfortunately for Christians reality doesn't care what they think. Reality is what it is and nothing can change it including wishful thinking.
Christianity is completely wrong about everything and it must be thrown out.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateAChristian/comments/6n1zox/the_resurrection_appearance_reports_are/?sort=new
There is a lot of fucking stupid in Idiot America.
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
At Reddit I asked Christian retards a question. I expect to be either ignored or I will get a moronic answer.
"Weekly Ask a Christian"
It's nice to make that possible even though I will probably be ignored.
My question for Christians: Have you ever considered the possibility that you're wasting your life being completely wrong about everything?
It's obvious to me the Christian beliefs are just fantasies. Do Christians ever consider the obvious fact that a magical resurrection and a magical 2nd life are completely impossible?
Reality is a wonderful thing because it's interesting and because it's real. I don't understand why Christians want to throw reality out.
Once in my life I convinced a creationist to throw out the moronic magical creationism fantasy using evidence from ERVs.
I was able to convince a creationist to throw out creationism thanks to this evidence. He gave me some bullshit from the Christian Creationist Discovery Institute (aka Crackpot Central). According to those idiots the ERVs are functional. I explained it doesn't matter if they're functional or not. The point of the evidence is the ERVs are found at the exact same locations in the genome of chimpanzee apes and human apes.
He understood and said this was a problem for creationism and he asked for a book recommendation. I suggested Why Evolution Is True by Jerry Coyne and he said he would read it but he was not throwing out his magic god fairy. I said it doesn't matter. At least you're trying to understand evolution and that's wonderful. I congratulated him.
Every other attempt to explain science to these brain-dead science deniers failed. They don't understand because they don't want to understand.
He understood and said this was a problem for creationism and he asked for a book recommendation. I suggested Why Evolution Is True by Jerry Coyne and he said he would read it but he was not throwing out his magic god fairy. I said it doesn't matter. At least you're trying to understand evolution and that's wonderful. I congratulated him.
Every other attempt to explain science to these brain-dead science deniers failed. They don't understand because they don't want to understand.
Tuesday, July 11, 2017
At Reddit I answered a question about religious stupidity.
"Ex-theists: What would you say brought you to your previous beliefs/religion?"
It's probably the same reason for most people who threw out religious stupidity. Brainwashing, aka child abuse. In my case it was ugly nuns from grade 1 to grade 8. "Christ died for your sins". I was forced to listen to that ridiculous nonsense thousands of times.
I threw out religion and I threw out the Magic Man because it's obviously a fantasy for feeble-minded cowards. Reality makes the god-soaked cry.
Not everyone has what it takes to grow up and throw out the bull-stuff. A brain is required.
It's probably the same reason for most people who threw out religious stupidity. Brainwashing, aka child abuse. In my case it was ugly nuns from grade 1 to grade 8. "Christ died for your sins". I was forced to listen to that ridiculous nonsense thousands of times.
I threw out religion and I threw out the Magic Man because it's obviously a fantasy for feeble-minded cowards. Reality makes the god-soaked cry.
Not everyone has what it takes to grow up and throw out the bull-stuff. A brain is required.
Monday, July 10, 2017
Some people, aka idiots, call themselves atheists but they're not atheists. They don't even know what an atheist is.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/06/01/10-facts-about-atheists/
A real atheist: 100% certain the Magic Man is not real.
Everyone else is an idiot.
A real atheist: 100% certain the Magic Man is not real.
Everyone else is an idiot.